Abstract
Working from the premise that dioramas are portals into ecosystems past and present, we examine the affordances of technology to help visitors step through these portals into a richer understanding of ecosystems. We first describe what we mean by a richer understanding of ecosystems. Using three examples we illustrate the basic affordances of dioramas for model-based learning and the use of technology to enhance visitor interactions with the ecosystems they represent. We conclude with a discussion of principled ways of using technology to facilitate model-based learning by deepening visitors’ engagement with the diorama and extending the experience beyond the visit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beer, V. (1987). Great expectations: Do museums know what visitors are doing? Curator: The Museum Journal, 30(3), 206–215.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Board on science education, center for education. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Bitgood, S. (1993). Social influences on the visitor museum experience. Visitor Behavior, 8(3), 4–5.
Blud, L. M. (1990). Social interaction and learning among family groups visiting a museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(1), 43–51.
Bradburne, J. M. (2000). Interaction in the museum: Observing, supporting, learning. Libri books on demand.
Bruce, J. (2010). Innovative museum guide systems. Proceedings of Usable Design Systems. Glasgow, Scotland.
Buckley, B. C. (2012). Model-based learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2300–2303). Drodrecht: Springer.
Buckley, B. C., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the role of representations and expressed models in building mental models. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 105–122). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cone, C. A., & Kendall, K. (1978). Space, time, and family interaction: Visitor behavior at the Science Museum of Minnesota. Curator: The Museum Journal, 21(3), 245–258.
Crone, W. C. (2006). Bringing nano to the public: A collaboration opportunity for researchers and museums. In S. E. Koch (Ed.), Nanoscale informal science education network. St. Paul: Science Museum of Minnesota.
Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. Learning conversations in museums, 333–356.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: What makes visitors want to learn? Museum News, 74(3), 34–7, 59–62.
Duff, W., Carter, J., Dallas, C., Howarth, L., Ross, S., Sheffield, R., & Tilson, C. (2009). The changing museum environment in North America and the impact of technology on museum work. Proceedings: Cultural Heritage Online. Florence.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. board on science education, center for education. division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Falk, J. (1983). Time and behavior as predictors of learning. Science Education, 67, 267–276.
Falk, J. H. (1993). Assessing the impact of exhibit arrangement on visitor behavior and learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 36(2), 133–146.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Flagg, B. N. (1994). Visitors in front of the small screen. What research says about learning in science museums. ASTC News, 2, 21–24.
Gee, J. P., & Levine, M. H. (2009). Welcome to our virtual worlds. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 48–52.
Hausmann, R. G. M., van de Sande, B., & VanLehn, K. (2008). Shall we explain? Augmenting learning from intelligent tutoring systems and peer collaboration. In B. P. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Heath, C., von Lehm, D., & Osborne, J. (2005). Interaction and interactives: Collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 91–101.
Hong Kong Museum of History. (2004). The natural environment. http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/ce/Museum/History/en/gallery1.php.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Etr & D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex.
Lim, K. Y. T., & Wang, J. Y. Z. (2005). Collaborative handheld gaming in education. Educational Media International, 42(4), 351–359.
Liu, T.-Y., Tan, T.-H., & Chu, Y.-L. (2009). Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 161–175.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McIntyre, M. H. (2003). Engaging or distracting? Visitor responses to interactives in the V & A British Galleries. http://www.vam.ac.uk/files/file_upload/5877_file.pdf.
McManus, P. (1994). Families in museums. In R. Miles & L. Zavala (Eds.). Towards the museum of the future: New European perspectives (pp. 81–97). London: Routledge.
McManus, P. M. (1988). Good companions: More on the social determination of learning-related behavior in a science museum. Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 7(1), 37–44.
Meisner, R., vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., Burch, A., Gammon, B., & Reisman, M. (2007). Exhibiting performance: Co-participation in science centres and museums. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1531–1555.
Morrison, A., Oulasvirta, A., Peltonen, P., Lemmela, S., Jacucci, G., Reitmayr, G., et al. (2009). Like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map. Proceedings of CHI2009, ACM Press, New York. Best paper award nomination.
Paris, S. (Ed.). (2002). Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Patten, B., Arnedillo Sánchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers and Education, 46, 294–308.
Perry, D. L. (1993). Beyond cognition and affect: The anatomy of a museum exhibit. In D. Thompson, S. Bitgood, A. Benefeld, H. Shettel, & R. Williams (Eds.). Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 6, pp. 43–7). Jacksonville: Center for Social Design.
Quinn, S. C. (2006). Windows on nature: The great habitat dioramas of the american museum of natural history. New York: Abrams.
Schmitt, B., Bach, C., Dubois, E., & Duranthon, F. (2010). Designing and evaluating advanced interactive experiences to increase visitor’s stimulation in a museum. Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference. Megève, France.
Schulze, C. (2001). Multimedia in Museen. Standpunkte und Aspekte interaktiver digitaler Systeme im Ausstellungsbereich. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universit¨ats Verlag.
Schultz, P., & Shugart, E. (2007). Communicating with Museum Audiences about Climate Science. Paper presented at the Eugene Rasmusson Symposium, Washington, DC.
Screven, C. G. (1976). Exhibit evaluation: A goal-referenced approach. Curator: The Museum Journal, 52(9), 271–290.
Scrimshaw, P., & Wegerif, R. (Eds.). (1997). Computers and talk in the primary classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Serrell, B. (1993). Using behaviour to define the effectiveness of exhibitions. In S. Bicknell (Ed.), Museum visitor studies in the 90s (pp. 140–144). London: Science Museum.
Serrell, B., & Raphling, B. (1992). Computers on the exhibit floor. Curator: The Museum Journal, 35(3), 181–189.
Shettel, H. (2001). Do we know how to define exhibit effectiveness? Curator: The Museum Journal, 44(4), 327–334.
Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad city mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5–29.
Sutton, C. (1995). The scientific model as a form of speech in g. welford. In J. Osborne & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe (pp. 143–152). London: Falmer Press.
Tallon, L., & Walker, K. (2008). Digital technologies and the museum experience: Handheld guides and other media. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Thomas, S., & Mintz, A. (Eds.). (1998). The virtual and the real: Media in the museum. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2001). Exhibiting interaction: Conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries. Symbolic Interaction, 24(2), 189–216.
Vonderwell, S., Sparrow, K., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Using handheld computers and probeware in inquiry-based science education. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, Fall, 1–14.
Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thought and language. (Trans: (1962) Hanfmann, E. & Vakar, G.) Cambridge: MIT Press.
Weller, A. M., Bickar, J. C., & McGuinness, P. (2008). Making field trips podtastic!: Use of handheld wireless technology alleviates isolation and encourages collaboration. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(6), 18–21.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wohlfromm, A. (2002) Museum als Medium. Neue Medien in Museen. Koln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loveland, M., Buckley, B., Quellmalz, E. (2015). Using Technology to Deepen and Extend Visitors’ Interactions with Dioramas. In: Tunnicliffe, S., Scheersoi, A. (eds) Natural History Dioramas. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9496-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9496-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9495-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9496-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)