Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research pp 633–647Cite as

Globalisation and National Curriculum Reform in Australia: The Push for Asia Literacy

Abstract

This chapter explores the policy context for the push for a national curriculum and the inclusion of Asia literacy for schooling in Australia in the light of current links between globalisation, education and policy analysis and the notion of the learning/knowledge society of the twenty-first century. It is anticipated that the discussion of the Australian context will be insightful for those other nations concerned with positioning Asia in school curricula, including New Zealand, Canada, the USA and the UK. In doing so, the chapter considers the challenges to the implementation of Asia literacy in Australia with specific reference to current and future teachers for, as with many nations, the teaching profession in Australia is on the cusp of generational change as large numbers of teachers aged in their mid- to late 50s embark on retirement (Teaching Australia, Teaching and leading for quality Australian schools. A review and synthesis of research-based knowledge. Retrieved from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/tasmanian_polytechnic.pdf, 2007). Of particular concern in relation to these demographic shifts is meeting the demand for large numbers of replacement teachers and preparing future teachers (Skilbeck M, Connell H, Teachers for the future – the changing nature of society and related issues for the teaching workforce (A report to teacher quality and educational leadership taskforce for MCEETYA). AGPS, Canberra, 2004; McKenzie P, Res Dev 27(2):1–5. Retrieved June 2, 2014. Retrieved from: http://research.acer.edu.au/resdev/vol27/iss27/2, 2012) with Asia-related knowledge. The chapter is structured as follows. First, it details the complex environment for education policymaking in Australia. Specific reference is made to the ways in which the idiosyncrasies of a federal system of education have been navigated by national governments in Australia as they responded to globalisation from the early 1980s to 2013. Discussion centres on how high-level and centralised policymaking finally secured agreement for a national curriculum and a focus on teacher professional standards. The second part of the chapter explores the push for Asia literacy and its inclusion in the first national curriculum to be implemented in Australia. Specific reference is made to the challenge of preparing teachers with Asia-related knowledge, understanding and skills in response to the requirements of recently released teacher professional standards. Finally, the chapter posits whether this particular approach to policymaking in response to globalisation has concluded with the election of a new national government in Australia.

Keywords

  • National Curriculum
  • Asian Language
  • Australian Curriculum
  • Ministerial Council
  • Asia Literacy

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_37
  • Chapter length: 15 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-017-9493-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asia Education Foundation (AEF). (2012). Submission to the Australian Government white paper on Australia in the Asian century. Retrieved from http://www.asiaeducation.edu.au/default.asp

  • Asian Century Taskforce. (2012). White paper on Australia in the Asian century. Canberra: Asian Century Taskforce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Studies Association of Australia. (2002). Maximizing Australia’s Asia knowledge: Repositioning and renewal of a national asset. A report by the Asian Studies Association of Australia. Melbourne: ASAA Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auchmuty, J. J. (Chair). (1970). The teaching of Asian languages and cultures (The Auchmuty report). Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). The Australian curriculum v6.0. Retrieved from: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au

  • Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011a). Australian professional standards for teachers. Carlton: Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011b). Australian professional standards for principals. Carlton: Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1993). The colonising discourses of devolution and restructuring in educational administration: Why now and who gains? Paper presented at the AARE conference, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, L. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (3rd ed., pp. 1–2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2013, May). National plan for school improvement. Retrieved from: http://www.budget.gov.au/2013-14/content/glossy/gonski_policy/download/NPSI.pdf

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). Retrieved from: http://www.pm.gov.au/press-office/australia-asian-century-white-paperaustralias-roadmap-navigating-asian-century

  • Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2008). National partnership on improving teacher quality. Retrieved from: http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/natpartteacherquality.pdf

  • Dale, R. (2005). Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education, 4(2), 117–149.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v2008n2001.html

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Knowledge for teaching: What do we know? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 1316–1323). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. (1988). Strengthening Australia’s schools: A consideration of the focus and content of schooling. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. (2011). Reaction to point and counterpoint. Curriculum Perspectives, 31(1), 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R. (1989). Australia and the Northeast Asian ascendancy (The Garnaut report). Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillard, J. (2008). Education revolution: COAG agrees to new schools reform plan. Media release, 27 March, 2008. Retrieved from: http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Releases/Pages/Article_081013_144117.aspx

  • Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 1–27). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, P., Fleming, R., & Trotter, L. (2009). Legitimacy and identity in teacher education: A micro-political struggle constrained by macro-political pressures. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 5–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Halse, C., Cloonan, A., Dyer, J., Kostogriz, A., Toe, D., & Weinmann, M. (2013). Asia literacy and the Australian teaching workforce. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2003, October 19–21). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Education Research annual conference. Retrieved from: http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/limestonecoast/files/pages/new%20page/PLC/teachers_make_a_difference.pdf

  • Henderson, D. (1999). The Rudd report: An anatomy of an education reform. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2003). Meeting the national interest through Asia literacy: An overview of the major stages and debates. Asian Studies Review, 27(1), 23–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2008, June). Politics and policy-making for Asia literacy: The Rudd report and a national strategy in Australian education. Asian Studies Review, 32(2), 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, P. (Hon). (1991, October 22). Address to the national press club, Untitled, billed as Most prominent backbencher speech. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & Lingard, B. (1997). Ministerialisation and politicisation: Changing structures and practices of education policy production. In B. Lingard & P. Porter (Eds.), A national approach to schooling in Australia? Essays on the development of national policies in schools education (pp. 26–45). Canberra: Australian College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37/

  • Levin, J. (2001). Globalizing the community college. New York: Palgrave.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (1994, March 25). Asian languages and Australia’s future. Education Views, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). After the marketplace: Evidence, social science and educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 87–107.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, P. (2012). Painting a picture of the teaching workforce. Research Developments, 27(2), 1–5. Retrieved June 2, 2014. Retrieved from: http://research.acer.edu.au/resdev/vol27/iss27/2

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2003). A national framework for professional standards for teaching. Retrieved from: http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/national_framework_file.pdf

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from: www.mceetya.edu.au/mceetya/melbourne_declaration,25979.html

  • Nye, J. (2005). Power in the global information age: From realism to globalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, L. (2014, March 15). New way to fix old problem with federalism. Herald Sun. Retrieved from: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/new-way-to-fix-old-problem-with-federalism/story-fni0fha6-1226855178626

  • Ohmae, K. (2000). The invisible continent: Four strategic imperatives of the new economy. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers (6th ed.). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, D. (2005). Education for location? The policy context of “becoming Asia-literate” in five western countries/regions in the 1990s. Comparative Education, 41(2), 171–198.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, K. (1997). Riders in the chariot: Curriculum reform and the national interest, 1965–1995. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne, C. (2014). Review of national curriculum to put students first. Press release. Retrieved from: http://ministers.education.gov.au/pyne/review-national-curriculum-put-students-first

  • Quiggan, J. (1999). Globalisation, neoliberalism and inequality in Australia. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 10(2), 240–259.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (2009, October 2). Is this a revolution?: A critical analysis of the Rudd government’s national education agenda. The 2009 Garth Boomer Memorial lecture at the Australian Curriculum Studies Association (ACSA) biennial conference curriculum: A national conversation, Canberra, ACT. Retrieved from: http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/ACSA%20Boomer%20address.pdf

  • Reid, A., & Johnson, B. (Eds.). (1993). Critical issues in Australian education in the 1990s. Adelaide: Painters Prints.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2000). The follies of globalisation theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, K. (Chair). (1994). Asian languages and Australia’s economic future. A report prepared for the Council of Australian Governments on a proposed national Asian languages/studies strategy for Australian schools (The Rudd report). Brisbane: Queensland Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, K. (1998, December 4). Personal interview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilbeck, M., & Connell, H. (2004). Teachers for the future – The changing nature of society and related issues for the teaching workforce (A report to teacher quality and educational leadership taskforce for MCEETYA). Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teaching Australia. (2007). Teaching and leading for quality Australian schools. A review and synthesis of research-based knowledge. Retrieved from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/tasmanian_polytechnic.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus (E Block Room E 228), Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia

    Deborah Henderson

Authors
  1. Deborah Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Henderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Arts, Australian Catholic University (Melbourne Campus), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Joseph Zajda

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henderson, D. (2015). Globalisation and National Curriculum Reform in Australia: The Push for Asia Literacy. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_37

Download citation