Modeling of Mechanical Soil Properties

  • Nozomu Yoshida
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 36)


Methods for modeling the mechanical properties are described in this chapter. Many data are required in the detailed seismic ground response analysis. Therefore, engineers need to know their mechanical meaning.


Shear Strength Constitutive Model Bulk Modulus Triaxial Test Hysteresis Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adachi N, Tatsuoka F (1986) Soil mechanics III- consolidation, shear and dynamic analysis-. Gihodo, Tokyo, p 339Google Scholar
  2. Desai CS, Christian JT (1977) Numerical methods in geotechnical engineering, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 696–699Google Scholar
  3. Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Proc ASCE J SM 96(No. SM5):1629, 1653Google Scholar
  4. Editorial Committee on Dynamic Analysis of Ground -from Foundation to Application (2007) Dynamic analysis of ground -from fundamental to application, JGS, Tokyo, 152 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Editorial committee on elastic-plastic constitutive model of soil (2009) Elastic-plastic constitutive model of soil, JGS, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Finn WDL, Byrne PL, Martin GR (1976) Seismic response and liquefaction of sands. J GED ASCE 102(GT8):841–856Google Scholar
  7. Fukutake K (1997) Study of three dimensional liquefaction analysis of soil-structure system considering multi-directional nature of shear deformation. Ohsaki research report, No. 97-03, Shimizu Corp, Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Fukutake Y, Ohtsuki A (1989) Analysis by ALISS. In: Proceedings of symposium on behavior of ground and soil-structures during earthquake, JGS, Tokyo, pp 125–134 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 98(SM7):667–692Google Scholar
  10. Ishihara K (1982) Evaluation of soil properties for use in earthquake response analysis. In: International symposium on numerical models in geomechanics, Zurich, pp 237–259Google Scholar
  11. Ishihara K, Yoshida N, Tsujino S (1984) Modelling of hysteresis rule of stress-strain model. In: Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Japan society of civil engineering, vol I, pp 735–736 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Ishihara K, Yoshida N, Tsujino S (1985) Modelling of stress-strain relations of soils in cyclic loading. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference for numerical method in geomechanics, Nagoya, vol 1, pp 373–380Google Scholar
  13. Jennings PC (1964) Periodic response of a general yielding structure. Proc ASCE EM2:131–163Google Scholar
  14. JSSMFE (1983–1984) Introduction of constitutive model of soil. Tsuchi-to-Kiso, JSSMFE, Tokyo, vol 31–32 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20(2):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kokusho T, Sakurai A (1979) On modified Hardin-F\Drnevich model. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Japan national conference on geotechnical engineering, JSSMFE, Tokyo, vol III, pp 1181–1184Google Scholar
  17. Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress-strain response; cohesive soils. Proc ASCE SM1:115–143Google Scholar
  18. Kuwano J, Ishihara K (1988) Analysis of permanent deformation of earth dams due to earthquakes. Soils Found 28(1):41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lade PV, Nelson RB (1987) Modelling the elastic behavior of granular materials. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 11:521–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lysmer J (1973) Modal damping and complex stiffness. University of California Note, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. Lysmer J, Udaka T, Tsai C-F, Seed HB (1975) FLUSH a computer program for approximate 3-D analysis of soil-structure interaction problems, Report No. EERC75-30. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Murayama S (1985) Constitutive laws of soils. Report of ISSMFE subcommittee on constitutive laws of soils and proceedings of discussion session IA XI ICSMFE, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Murono Y (1990) A study on the seismic design methodology of pile foundation considering the non-linear dynamic interaction caused by strong ground motions. RTRI Report, Special No. 32, Railway Technical Research Institute (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. Nakagawa K, Soga K, Mitchell JK (1997) Observation of Biot compressional wave of the second kind in granular soils. Geotechnique 47:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pande GN, Zienkiewicz OC (1982) Soil mechanics-transient and cyclic loads constitutive relations and numerical treatment. Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. PWRI (1982) Numerical analysis of seismic response of ground -SHAKE, DESRA-, Report of PWRI, No. 1778, pp 1–47 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. Ramberg W, Osgood WT (1943) Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters, Tech Note 902, NACA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Research committee on effect of constitutive model on numerical analysis (2002) Report of the committee on effect of characteristics of constitutive model on numerical analysis, Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo, 81 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. Sato M, Yasuda S, Yoshida N, Masuda T (1998) Simplified method for estimating maximum shear stress in the ground during earthquakes. J Geotechn Eng. Proc JSCE, 610/III-45:83–96 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Schmertmann JH (1991) The mechanical aging of soils. J GT ASCE 117(9):1288–1330Google Scholar
  31. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report no. EERC72-12, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  32. Shamoto, Y., Mori, N (1980) Applicability of Ramberg-Osgood model on hard clayey soil and silt. In: Proceedings of the 15th Japan national conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, JGS, Tokyo, pp 597–600 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  33. Tobita Y, Yoshida N (2004) State of arts and problems of constitutive model of geomaterial. Tsuchi-to-Kiso 50(8):1–6 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Towhata I (1989) Models for cyclic loading, mechanics of granular materials, report of ISSMFE technical committee on mechanics of granular materials, ISSMFE, Rio de Janeiro, pp 80–90Google Scholar
  35. Towhata I (1992) Dynamics deformation characteristics model of geo-material. Tsuchi-to-Kiso 40(5):75–82 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  36. Towhata I, Ishihara K (1985) Modelling soil behavior under principal stress axes rotation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference for numerical method in geomechanics, Nagoya A.A. Balkema, Torrerdam, vol 1, pp 523–530Google Scholar
  37. Yamashita S (1992) A study on effect of variety of factors that affect cyclic shear deformation characteristics of sand and its application. A thesis in the Department of Civil engineering presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Engineering, Hokkaido University, 258 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  38. Yoshida N (1996) Initial stress effect on response of level ground. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 1023Google Scholar
  39. Yoshida N, Tsujino S (1993) A simplified practical stress-strain model for the multi-dimensional analysis under repeated loading. In: Proceedings of the 28th Japan national conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 1221–1224 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  40. Yoshida N, Sawada S, Takeshima Y, Mikami T, Sawada S (2003) Effect of hysteretic damping characteristics on earthquake response of ground, JSCE J Earthq Eng Symp, vol 28, Paper no. 158 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nozomu Yoshida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringTohoku Gakuin UniversityMiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations