Input Earthquake Motions

  • Nozomu Yoshida
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 36)


As input earthquake motion for the seismic ground response analysis is usually given a priori as an analysis condition, the engineer need not choose them. This book also stands on the same point of view. It may be, however, necessary to know how it is chosen or determined.


Ground Motion Incident Wave Response Spectrum Earthquake Record Input Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amachi F (2009) Concept of bedrock and ground characteristics, Lecture on fundamentals of strong motion geotechnology, Seismological Society of Japan, [2009]
  2. Association for Earthquake Disaster Prevention (1992) Report of Strong motion array record database committee in 1991Google Scholar
  3. Association for Earthquake Disaster Prevention. Strong motion array record database, No. 1 (1993), No. 2 (1995) and No. 3 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. Association for Science Documents Information (1972) Digitized strong-motion earthquake acceleration in JapanGoogle Scholar
  5. Building Center of Japan (1992) Report of committee on design earthquake wave, 349 pp.; Engineering guideline for making design earthquake wave and commentary, 73 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Building Center of Japan (2010) On distribution of representative observed earthquake records (acceleration data). [2010]
  7. Chopra AK (2010) El Centro, 1940 ground motion data. [2010]
  8. Construction Ministry (2000) On structural calculation standard for structural safely of high rise building, ministerial announcements 1461 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Duke CM, Leeds DJ (1962) Site characteristics of Southern California strong motion earthquake stations, U.C.L.A. Department of Engineering Report No. 62–55Google Scholar
  10. Editorial Committee for the Repost on the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Disaster (2000) Report on the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Disaster, General Issue Volume 1, Compendium of earthquake disaster including Stochastic description, Maruzen, 549 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Electric Technical Guideline Committee (1987) Technical guidelines for aseismic design of nuclear power plants, Japan Electric AssociationGoogle Scholar
  12. Housing and Architecture Bureau of Yokohama City (2010) Characteristics of synthesized earthquake motion (yoko rock). [2010]
  13. Irikura K (1986) Prediction of strong ground acceleration motions using empirical Green’s function. In: Proceedings of the 7th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, pp 151–156Google Scholar
  14. Iwasaki T, Kawashima K, Takagi Y (1981) Analysis of earthquake record at Kaihoku bridge. In: Proceedings of the 18th JSCE earthquake engineering symposium-1989, earthquake Engineering Committee, JSCE, pp 293–296Google Scholar
  15. Japan Road Association (2002) Specifications for highway bridges. Part V, Seismic design, Maruzen, 317 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science (ed) (2002) Subject-book on disaster prevention, Tsukiji Shobo, 543 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. JSCE (1996) Proposal on earthquake resistance for civil engineering structures. [2005]
  18. Kobayashi K, Amaike F, Abe Y (1992) Attenuation characteristics of soil deposits and its formulation. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion. OdawaraGoogle Scholar
  19. Komaru Y, Kaneko F (1998) Why the 1D results varied much? -Ashigara Valley test site. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion, vol 1, pp 313–317, Yokosuka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  20. Midorikawa S, Kobayashi H (1978) Spectral characteristics of incident wave from seismic bedrock due to earthquake, Transactions of AIJ, No. 273, pp 43–54 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  21. Ohsaki Y (1983) Earthquake and building, Iwanami, 200 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. Port and Airport Research Institute (2010) Port area strong motion earthquake records observatory. [2010]
  23. Ports and Harbours Bureau, Ministry of Transport (eds) (1999) Technical standards and commentary of port and harbour facilities in Japan. The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. Sato K, Higashi S, Yajima H, Sasaki S (1998) Ashigara valley test site, 1D or 2D-3D? In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion, vol 1, pp 319–340, Yokosuka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  25. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report no. EERC72-12. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  26. Seekins LC, Brady AG, Carpenter C, Brown N (1992) Digitized strong-motion accelerograms of North and Central American earthquakes 1933–1986. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-7. [2010]
  27. Structural Engineers Association of California Vision 2000 Committee (1995) Vision 2000, performance based seismic engineering of buildingsGoogle Scholar
  28. Structural Safety Committee in Water Front Area (1992) Report on safety of large scaled buildings in water front area, Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association, 160 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Structural Safety Committee in Water Front Area (1993) Special issue on safety of buildings in water front area, Building Disaster Prevention, no. 182, pp 2–36Google Scholar
  30. Tamura K, Honda R (1998) Soil survey at Kobe Marine Observatory, PWRI Report No. 3625, Public Work Research Institute, Japan (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. The Building Center of Japan (2010) Synthesized base layer wave of the Japan Building Center of Japan, BCJ-L1 and BCJ-L2. [2010] (in Japanese)
  32. The Research Subcommittee on the Earthquake Motion (2002) Proceedings of the 30th symposium of earthquake ground motion -can design earthquake motion be defined at engineering seismic base layer, AIJGoogle Scholar
  33. Toki K (1981) Seismic response analysis of structures. New series of civil engineering, vol 11, Gihodo Shuppan, 250 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Tsuchida H, Uwabe T (2008) Characteristics of earthquake motion at bees layer estimated from earthquake records at ground surface, Technical note of the Port and Airport Research Institute, No. 11, 270 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. Yoshida N, Iai S (1998) Nonlinear site response and its evaluation and prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on the effect of surface geology on seismic motion, vol 1, pp 71–90, Yokosuka, JapanGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nozomu Yoshida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringTohoku Gakuin UniversityMiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations