Effect of Various Factors from Case Studies

  • Nozomu Yoshida
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 36)


Effect of various parameters on the result of the seismic ground response analysis is discussed through case studies.


Incident Wave Pulse Wave Subsurface Layer Maximum Acceleration Hyperbolic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arulanandan K, Scott RF (eds) (1993) Proceedings on verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Balkema, DavisGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of the Development of Architectural Research (1998) Report of design standard against various load based on performance based design, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. Electric Technical Guideline Committee (1987) Technical guidelines for aseismic design of nuclear power plants, Japan Electric Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. IASPEI/IAEE joint working group (1992) Proceedings of the international symposium on the effect of surface geology on seismic motion, Odawara, IASPEI/IAEEGoogle Scholar
  5. Japan Read Association (1985) Specifications for highway bridges and commentary, Part V, Earthquake resistant designGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaneko F (1993) Sensitivity analysis of one-dimensional analysis, research of the effects of surface geology on seismic motion. Report to the Ministry of Education, Takeuchi Y (ed), pp 78–90 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. Midorikawa S, Kobayashi H (1978) Spectral characteristics of incident wave from seismic bedrock due to earthquake. Transactions of AIJ, No. 273, pp 43–54 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Morimoto I, Suzuki S (1983) Effect of fluctuation of soil dynamic properties on results of one dimensional response analysis. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual meeting of JSSMFE, pp 635–636 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report no. EERC72-12. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  10. Towhata I, Ronteix S (1988) Probabilistic estimation of shear wave velocity of soils in terms of SPT-N and its application to seismic response analysis. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Japan national conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 825–826 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Yoshida N (2008) Accuracy of numerical analysis, performance based design of ground and structure considering liquefaction, Kanto Branch of JGS, pp 91–103 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Yoshida N, Kobayashi S, Suetomi I, Miura K (2002) Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(3):205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yoshida N, Sawada S, Takeshima Y, Mikami T, Sawada S (2003) Effect of hysteretic damping characteristics on earthquake response of ground. JSCE J Earthq Eng Symp, vol. 28, Paper No. 158 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nozomu Yoshida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringTohoku Gakuin UniversityMiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations