Advertisement

Evaluation of Accuracy and Earthquake Motion Indices

  • Nozomu Yoshida
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 36)

Abstract

It is impossible to simulate the earthquake motion perfectly in the seismic ground response analysis. In other words, seismic ground response analysis includes error because of the reasons in the following:

Keywords

Response Spectrum Spectral Intensity Seismic Intensity Maximum Acceleration Earthquake Record 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cabinet Office (2001) Manual to support earthquake damage estimation (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Editorial Committee for the Repost on the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Disaster (2000) Report on the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake disaster, general issue volume 1, compendium of earthquake disaster including stochastics description, Maruzen, 549 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. Explanation of JMA seismic intensity, Metrological Bureau (2009) http://www.kishou.go.jp/know/jishin.html [2010]
  4. Housner GW (1965) Intensity of earthquake ground shaking near the causative fault. In: Proceedings of the 3WCEE, New zealand, vol I, pp III-94-III-115Google Scholar
  5. Hwang H, Lin CK, Yeh YT, Cheng SN, Chen KC (2004) Attenuation relations of Arias intensity based on the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(9):509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. JMA (ed) (1996) Study on seismic intensity, Gyosei, 238 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. JSCE (1989) Seismic response analysis and earthquake resistant design, vol 1, Earthquake motion and dynamic property, Gihodo Shuppan, 170 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Kawashima K, Takagi Y, Iazawa K (1982) Procedure of instrument correction and displacement calculation for SMAC-B2 accelerograph records with considering accuracy of digitization. Proc JSCE 325:35–44Google Scholar
  9. Kawasumi H (1943) Earthquake intensity and intensity scale. Earthquake 15(1):6–12 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Kinoshita S, Ohtake M (eds) (2000) Fundamentals of strong motion, National Research Institute for Earthquake Science and Disaster Prevention. http://www.k-net.bosai.go.jp/k-net/gk/publication/ [2010]
  11. Muramatsu I (1967) Seismic risk, overviews of Japanese seismology. Jishin-2 20–4:281–290 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Noda S, Uwabe T, Chiba T (1976) Relation between seismic coefficient and ground acceleration for gravity quaywalls. Rep Port Harb Res Inst 14(4):67–111 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Notification of JMA, No. 4, February 15, 1996Google Scholar
  14. Okada N (2001) On earthquake motion index necessary for disaster prevention research. In: Discussion in the 26th JSCE earthquake engineering symposium-2001, Tokyo, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  15. Shimizu Y (2001) A study on development of real-time earthquake disaster mitigation system for city gas network and utilization. A Thesis in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Engineering, University of Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Standardization committee on test method of dynamic deformation characteristics of soil (1994) State of art report on test equipment and test method for dynamic deformation characteristics (in Japan). In: Proc., Symp. dynamic deformation characteristics in dynamic problem of ground and soil structures -test and investigation methods and its application, JGS, pp 1–22 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Towhata I, Park JK, Orense RP, Kano H (1996) Use of spectrum intensity for immediate detection of subsoil liquefaction. Soils Found 36(2):29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Usami T (2003) Materials for comprehensive list of destructive earthquakes in Japan, [416]-2001, Latest edition, University of Tokyo Press, 605 pp (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Yasuda S, Yoshikawa Y, Ushijima K, Ishikawa T (1993) A prediction method for liquefaction using spectral intensity. In: The 28th Japan national conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Kobe, pp 1325–1328 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Yoshida N (1993) STADAS, a computer program for static and dynamic analysis of ground and soil-structure interaction problems. Report, Soil Dynamics Group. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  21. Yoshida N (1995a) DYNEQ, a computer program for DYNamic response analysis of level ground by EQuivalent linear method, Version 3.25 (September, 2004). http://www.civil.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/yoshida-j.html [2010]
  22. Yoshida N (1995b) Earthquake response analysis at Port Island during the 1995 Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake. Tsuchi-to-Kiso 43(10):49–54 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Yoshida N (2004) DYNES3D, a computer program for dynamic response analysis of level ground by effective stress-nonlinear method, Version 2.6. http://www.civil.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/yoshida-j.html [2010]

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nozomu Yoshida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringTohoku Gakuin UniversityMiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations