Advertisement

Solution in Time

  • Nozomu Yoshida
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 36)

Abstract

Solution in space is described in the previous chapter, whereas solution in time is described in this section. There are two methods. One is made in the time domain by solving the step-by-step time integration scheme, and the other is made by converting the time domain into the frequency domain.

Keywords

Effective Strain Time Increment Maximum Acceleration Input Motion Frequency Domain Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Association for Disaster Prevention Research (1990) Report on investigation and research on development of two-dimensional liquefaction analysis computer program (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Clough RW, Penzien J (1975) Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 634 ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Finn WDL, Martin GR, Lee MKW (1978) Comparison of dynamic analyses for saturated sands. In: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, GT special conference, vol 1, pp 472–491Google Scholar
  4. Gudehus G (ed) (1977) Finite elements in geomechanics. Wiley, London, 673 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagiwara T, Kiyota Y (1992) Seismic response analysis based on equivalent linearization of soil constants in modal region Part I theory and example of inverse analysis, summaries of the technical papers of annual meeting of AIJ (Hokuriku), pp 487–488Google Scholar
  6. Hudson M, Idriss IM, Beikae M (1994) User’s manual for QUAD4M, a computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures and incorporating a compliant base. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  7. Iwasaki T, Kawashima K, Tatsuoka F (1980) Effect of strain dependence of soil properties on seismic response of subsurface grounds. Civ Eng J PWRI 22(12):27–32 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Kokusho T (1982) Dynamic deformation characteristics of soil and nonlinear response of ground, Report no. 301, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Kokusho T, Satoh K, Matsumoto M (1995) Nonlinear dynamic response of soil ground during 1995 Hyogo-ken nanbu earthquake. Tsuchi-To-Kiso 43(9):39–43 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Masuda T (2001) Study on damage to electric facilities due to earthquake and remedial measures against it. Theses submitted to the University of Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Masuda T, Yasuda S, Yoshida N, Sato M (2001) Field investigations and laboratory soil tests on heterogeneous nature of alluvial deposits. Soils Found 41(4):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miura K, Yoshida N, Kim Y (2001) Frequency-dependent property of waves in saturated soil. Soils Found 42(2):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. Proc ASCE J Eng Mech Div 85:67–94Google Scholar
  14. Nigam NC, Jennings PC (1964) Calculation of response spectra from strong motion earthquake records. BSSA 59(2):909–922Google Scholar
  15. Nozawa T, Ohki H, Annaka T (1987) Analysis of amplification characteristics of ground by one-dimensional wave propagation theory considering frequency dependent characteristics of damping. In: Proceedings of the 19th JSCE earthquake engineering symposium 1987, JSCE, Tokyo, pp 109–112 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Ohsaki Y (1994) Introduction of spectrum analysis of ground motion, new edn. Kajima Institute Publishing, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Sakai H, Yoshida N, Sawada S (2005) Numerical errors in non-linear earthquake response analyses caused by time integration procedures. J Struct Mech Earthq Eng Proc JSCE No. 794/I-72:291–300 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (eds) (1972) SHAKE a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. University of California, Berkeley, Report No. EERC72-12Google Scholar
  19. Sezawa K (1932) Theory of vibration, Iwanami Shoten, 799 pp; facsimile edition (1971), Gendai Kogaku-sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  20. Shibata A (2010) Dynamic analysis of earthquake resistant structures. Tohoku University Press, Sendai, 369 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Souza AFD, Garg VK (1984) Advanced dynamics, modeling and analysis. Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliffs, pp 213–227Google Scholar
  22. Suetomi I, Yoshida N (1996) A comparison of frequency-dependent damping in equivalent linear analysis. In: Proceedings of the 31st symposium of geotechnical engineering, JGS, Kitami, pp 1119–1120 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Sugito M, Goda H, Masuda T (1994) Frequency dependent equi-linearized technique for seismic response analysis of multi-layered ground. J Geotech Eng Proc JSCE 493/III-27:49–58 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. Sato T, Hino T (1982) Error measure for time integration schemes in structural dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 6th Japan symposium of earthquake engineering, Tokyo, pp 1049–1056Google Scholar
  25. Tazoh T, Sato M, Shimizu K, Koyama K, Watanabe O (1987) Effect of layer-subdivision and effective strain coefficient in nonlinear seismic response analysis. In: The 22nd Japan national conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 655–658 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  26. Togawa H (1975) Vibration analysis by finite element method. Science-sha (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. Yoshida N (1994) Applicability of conventional computer code SHAKE to nonlinear problem. In: Proceeding symposium on amplification of ground shaking in soft ground, JSSMFE, Tokyo, pp 14–31 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. Yoshida N (1995) DYNEQ a computer program for DYNamic response analysis of level ground by EQuivalent linear method, version 3.25 (September 2004), http://www.civil.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/yoshida-j.html/ [2010]
  29. Yoshida N, Kobayashi S, Suetomi I, Miura K (2002) Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(3):205–222, ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nozomu Yoshida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringTohoku Gakuin UniversityMiyagiJapan

Personalised recommendations