Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions To Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 74))

  • 1453 Accesses

Abstract

The field of social and psychological theory is marked by an astounding degree of fragmentation and confusion. This situation derives in large part from a failure to resolve thorny questions about the entanglement of knowledge claims with historical contexts, cultural influences, and moral values. The philosopher Richard Bernstein argues that these difficulties reflect a struggle to find a way beyond the opposition and unresolved tension between broad philosophical outlooks of “objectivism” and “relativism,” a struggle taking place in many cultural and intellectual arenas, including the philosophy of natural science, philosophy proper, literary theory, and elsewhere. We note that hermeneutic philosophy represents a compelling attempt to chart such a path. We then outline the perspective of the British philosopher and theologian Colin Gunton who presents a powerful and unique analysis of modern dilemmas and longstanding difficulties in reconciling the “one” and the “many” in Western thought. Gunton’s ideas are highly congruent with hermeneutics and both reinforce and enrich its ontology of the human life-world and human agency. We suggest several specific ways in which Gunton’s view and hermeneutic thought cross-fertilize one another, extending their ability to speak to current cultural and spiritual dilemmas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gunton looks with favor on Plato’s seeking to formulate an affirmative “engaged” philosophical outlook and encourages us to do the same today. But he points out there is no doubt that Plato “chose…unity rather than plurality. At times like his and ours, of real or threatened social disintegration, there is always a temptation to seek unity and stability above all, and that is one reason why totalitarianism is a constant threat in modern times” (1993, 21).

  2. 2.

    This paradox is illustrated by a remarkable commercial for Dr. Pepper, where virtually every person ends up wearing a Dr. Pepper T-shirt, walking in the same direction and drinking the same soft drink while “I gotta be me” is playing as the background music. The particularity of being ‘me’ is completely lost in the overwhelming conformity to sameness.

  3. 3.

    The struggle of the one vs. the many continues in contemporary Christianity. For example, consider the emphasis on individual righteousness and freedom of many conservative evangelicals that leads them to march in lock step with the most conservative strands of the Republican Party and ostracize those Christians who do not follow suit. On the other side, many liberal Christians, out of a concern to avoid such dogmatism at all costs, limit their ethical outlook to fighting discrimination and domination and endorsing conventional (liberal) notions of “social justice” and criticizing those who do not “go thou, and do likewise.”

  4. 4.

    There is a deep sense in which the liberationist aspirations of the Enlightenment are paternalistic in denying the particularity of individuals for the greater good of the very freedom of those individuals from oppression and false beliefs. Similar forms of hidden paternalism show up in contemporary Western consumerism and mercantilism. For example, Evgeny Morozov (2012) has analyzed how personal liberation lies at the heart of Apple’s values for the design and marketing of their products, while it paternalistically ignores the particularity of customers funneling them into the use of identical technology and features.

  5. 5.

    Looked at this way, current polarized debates in the U.S. about big versus small government represent an argument between a more or less oppressive false universal and a rebellion of the many against the one that denies the need for some focus of unity in the affairs of a nation.

  6. 6.

    According to Taylor, an action “is dialogical…when it is effected by an integrated, non-individual agent. This means that for those involved in it, its identity as this kind of action essentially depends on the agency being shared” (1991, 311).

  7. 7.

    Richardson and Fowers argue that many kinds of postmodern and social constructionist theory, as well, partake of this form of disengagement and inscribe a distanced, somewhat manipulative stance toward the world and others (1998). For this reason, Selznick (1992) refers to this kind of postmodernism as the “wayward child of modernism.”

  8. 8.

    There is a close parallel between this conception of hermeneutic dialogue and Bakhtin’s (1981) idea of continual tension in communication between “centripetal” forces pushing toward unity and agreement and “centrifugal” forces seeking multiplicity and disagreement.

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan, Ann Swindler, and Steven Tipton. 1985. Habits of the heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard J. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Robert C. 2007. The philosophy of the social sciences: An introduction. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, David. 2006. Self-construction through consumption activities: An analysis and review of alternatives. In The self: Beyond the postmodern crisis, ed. Paul Vitz and Susan Felch, 149–168. Wilmington: ISI books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Philip. 1990. Why the self is empty. American Psychologist 45: 599–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Joseph. 1995. Beyond sovereignty and deconstruction: The storied self. Philosophy and Social Criticism 21: 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, Louis. 1976. Transcendent selfhood: The rediscovery of the inner life. New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1996. The new golden rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, Blaine. 2005. Virtue ethics and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices. Washington, DC: APA Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich. (1941) 1969. Escape from freedom. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and Method, 2nd rev. ed. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, Kenneth. 1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40: 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guignon, Charles. 1989. Truth as disclosure: Art, language, history. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 28: 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guignon, Charles. 1991. Pragmatism or hermeneutics? Epistemology after foundationalism. In The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture, ed. David Hiley, James Bohman, and Richard Schusterman, 81–101. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, Colin. 1993. The one, the three, and the many: God, creation and the culture of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, Colin. (1985) 2006. Enlightenment and alienation: An essay toward a trinitarian theology. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Theory and practice. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1982. A reply to my critics. In Habermas: Critical debates, ed. John Thompson and David Held, 263–269. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, Václav. 1991. In Open letters: Selected prose, 1965–1900, ed. Paul Wiulson. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. (1927) 1953. Sein und Zeit (SZ). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Paul. 1978. A history of Christianity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. (1846) 2009. Two Ages: “The Age of Revolution” and the “Present Age,” A Literary Review. Trans. Howard Hong and Edna Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, Heinz. 1977. The restoration of the self. Madison: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Thomas. 1978. The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Thomas. 1988. Panel discussion: Construction and constraint. In Construction and constraint: The shaping of scientific rationality, ed. Ernan McMullen, 223–246. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1991. In On liberty and other essays, ed. John Gray. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, Evgeny. 2012. Form and fortune. The New Republic 243(4): 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pippin, Robert. 1990. Modernism as a philosophical problem. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1974. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Frank, and Blaine Fowers. 1998. Interpretive social science: An overview. American Behavioral Scientist 41: 465–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Frank, and Nicolette Manglos. 2012. Rethinking instrumentalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17: 462–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Frank, and Robert C. Bishop. 2002. Rethinking determinism in social science. In Between chance and choice: Interdisciplinary perspectives on determinism, ed. Harald Atmanspacher and Robert Bishop, 425–445. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Frank, Anthony Rogers, and Jennifer McCarroll. 1998. Toward a dialogical self. American Behavioral Scientist 41: 496–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Frank, Blaine Fowers, and Charles Guignon. 1999. Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, Michael. 1993. Philosophy of social science. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1985. Solidarity or objectivity? In Post-analytic philosophy, ed. John Rajchman and Cornel West, 3–19. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael. 1996. Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip. 1992. The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, John, and Michael Billig. 1998. A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In Bakhtin and the human sciences: No last words, ed. Michael Bell and Michael Gardiner, 13–29. London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1985. Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1991. The dialogical self. In The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture, ed. David Hiley, James Bohman, and Richard Schusterman, 304–314. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1995. Philosophical arguments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 2002. Gadamer and the human sciences. In The Cambridge companion to Gadamer, ed. Robert Dostal, 126–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, James. 1985. Without God, without creed: The origins of unbelief in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Alan. 1989. Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank C. Richardson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richardson, F.C., Bishop, R.C. (2015). Philosophical Hermeneutics and the One and the Many. In: Pedersen, H., Altman, M. (eds) Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9442-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics