Advertisement

More Leaders: Dissipated or Distributed Leadership?

  • Ciaran Sugrue
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 20)

Abstract

As the principal’s role has become more complex and complicated, there has been increasing advocacy for ‘teacher’ and ‘distributed’ leadership by policy advocates and some researchers. Against this international backdrop, this chapter focuses on how principals re-negotiate leadership responsibilities in a context where new management structures have been created at the national level, while internal school dynamics vary considerably. It deals with how principals re-negotiate leadership responsibilities amidst a changing school dynamic where policy rhetoric advocates a ‘distributed’ leadership role while legal requirements and more practical considerations constrain the enabling of colleagues to take on responsibility for leadership in a collaborative manner. The chapter provides further testimony that school culture and traditions, the inter-personal skills and leadership capital of the principal are critical in terms of the extent to which tinkering with existing provision rather than systematically building sustainable leadership capacity within schools continues to be a work in progress.

Keywords

Middle Management Leadership Responsibility Staff Meeting Post Holder Shared Leadership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Community, diversity and conflict among schoolteachers the ties that blind. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership toward a post-reform agenda in education. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Author. (2007). Report of the public service Benchmarking body. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. (2008a). The legacy of ERA, privatization and policy ratchet. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, S. (2008b). Performativity, privatisation, professionals and the state. In B. Cunningham (Ed.), Exploring professionalism (pp. 50–72). London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  6. Coghlan, M., & Desurmont, A. (2007). School autonomy in Europe policies and measures. Brussels: Eurydice.Google Scholar
  7. Coolahan, J., Hussey, C., & Kilfeather, F. (2012). The forum on patronage and pluralism in the primary sector. Dublin: Department of Education & Skills.Google Scholar
  8. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kingston, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter connecting lives, work and effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2009). Shaping school culture pitfalls, paradoxes, & promises (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. DES. (1999). Report of the Working Group on the role of the primary school principal. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  12. DES. (2003). Appointments to posts of responsibility circular 07/03.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Education. (1973). Responsibilities and duties of principal teachers and teachers in charge of national schools.Google Scholar
  14. Goodson, I. F., Moore, S., & Hargeaves, A. (2006). Missions, memory, and meaning teacher nostalgia and the sustainability of reform: The generation and degeneration of teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Government of Ireland. (1998). Education (No. 2) Bill. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1998/en/act/pub/0051/
  16. Green, J. (2011). Education, professionalism and the quest for accountability hitting the target by missing the point . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gronn, P. (2009). Hybrid leadership. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 17–40). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2005). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. F. (2006). Educational change over time: The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way the quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks: Corwin and Ontario Principals’ Council.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership developing tomorrow’s leaders. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations software of the mind. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York/London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Ireland, G. O. (2010). Public service agreement 2010–2014. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, D. (nd). Distributed leadership ‘spaces between the pebbles in the jar’. Retrieved August 12,2013, from http://networkedlearning.ncsl.org.uk/knowledge-base/research-papers/distributed-leadersip-the-space-between-the-pebbles-in-the-jar.pdf
  27. Kohn, M. (2008). Trust self-interest and the common good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  29. Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lieberman, A. (2008). How do teachers learn to lead? In C. Sugrue (Ed.), The future of educational change (pp. 204–218). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2004). Teacher leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. LRC. (2013). LRC proposals public service stability agreement 2013–2016. The Haddington road agreement. Dublin: Labour Relations Commission.Google Scholar
  37. Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education commercialization, carelessness and gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (Eds.). (2009). Connecting leadership and learning. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Moolemaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and school’s innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking a study of teaching as work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Nias, J., Southworth, G., & Yeomans, R. (1989). Staff relationships in the primary school. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  42. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Hopkins, D. (2009a). Improving school leadership, Volume 2: Case studies on system leadership. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  43. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2009b). Improving school leadership, Volume 1: Policy and practice. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Sugrue, C. (2009). From heroes and heroines to hermaphrodites: Emancipation or emasculation of school leaders and leadership? School Leadership and Management, 29(4), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciaran Sugrue
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity College DublinBelfield, DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations