Advertisement

Principal Professional Learning: Sources of Sustenance?

  • Ciaran Sugrue
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 20)

Abstract

Since the advent of NPM, in its various iterations it is generally accepted that the role of principal has become more ‘scripted’ and so too has preparation for the role, and the on-going support provided for those in post. Such intensification and increased performativity became more evident in the Irish context during the 1990s, in the wake of an OECD report that specifically called for ‘management’ training for principals. Henceforth, there has been a gradual infusion into policy documents of the language of NPM—targets, learning outcomes, accountability etc. What becomes evident in this chapter then is the increasing colonisation of the life worlds of school leaders by the system world increasingly being imposed by the pervasive influence of NPM, and how principals struggle in various ways to retain a sense of the purposes of education that are beyond the reach of or excluded from the mainstream by making their work more ‘auditable’ by various ‘rituals of verification’; mainly paper trails and Whole School Evaluation. There is a gradual alteration of school ecology as the infestation of the lifeworld of principals and teachers becomes pervasive. Learning in such circumstances may hasten the process through scripted preparation programmes, a form of ‘governmentality’ or build resistance through informal networks and unscripted learning. The purpose of this chapter is to document how this process has evolved over time and its impact on leaders and their leadership.

Keywords

Professional Development Professional Learning School Community Golf Swing Initial Teacher Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Community, diversity and conflict among schoolteachers the ties that blind. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership toward a post-reform Agenda in education. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (2000/2006). Liquid modernity Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders gender, educational restructuring, and organizational change. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  7. Charles, N., & Harris, C. (2007). Continuity and change in work-life balance choices. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(2), 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copland, M. A. (2001). The myth of the superprincipal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 528–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kingston, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter connecting lives, work and effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., et al. (2011). Successful school leadership linking with learning and achievement. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. DES. (1999). The Primary Curriculum, Dublin. http://www.curriculumonline.ie/Primary/Curriculum
  13. DES. (2006). A guide to whole school evaluation in primary schools. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Drudy, S. (2009). Recruitment to primary teaching in Ireland: A North/South comparative analysis. In S. Drudy (Ed.), Education in Ireland: Challenge and change. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Gadamer, H. G. (1975/1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & G. Marshall, Trans., 2nd ed.). London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gillies, D. (2013). Educational leadership and Michel Foucault. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Goodson, I. F., Biesta, G., Tedder, M., & Adair, N. (2010). Narrative learning. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Green, J. (2010). Education, professionalism and the quest for accountability hitting the target by missing the point. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Gronn, P. (2011). Risk, trust and leadership. In C. Sugrue & T. Dyrdal Solbrekke (Eds.), Professional responsibility: New horizons of praxis (pp. 89–101). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  23. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2005). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital transforming teaching in every school. New York/London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  26. Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school realizing the potential of system leadership. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
  28. Huberman, M., Grounauer, M., Mati, J., & Huberman, A. (1993). The lives of teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lambert, C. (2007). New labour, new leaders? Gendering transformational leadership. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 28(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lowney, C. (2003). Heroic leadership best practices from a 450 year-old company that changed the world. Chicago: Loyola Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education commercialization, carelessness and gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacBeath, J., Gronn, P., Opfer, D., Lowden, K., Forde, C., Cowie, M., et al. (2009). The recruitment and retention of headteachers in Scotland (Report to the scottish government). Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  34. Morgan, M., & Sugrue, C. (2005). Evaluation of the MISNEACH programme. Dublin: Department of Education & Science.Google Scholar
  35. O’Brien, M. (2011). Professional responsibility and an ethic of care: Teachers’ care as moral praxis. In C. Sugrue & T. Dyrdal Solbrekke (Eds.), Professional responsibility: New horizons of praxis (pp. 42–56). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. (1991). Reviews of national education policies for education: Ireland. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. OECD. (2010). Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Outcomes, policies and practices. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Power, M. (1999). The audity society rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sachs, J. (2004). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Sergiovanni, T. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey Bass & Co.Google Scholar
  42. Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Sugrue, C. (1997). Complexities of teaching: Child-centred perspectives. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sugrue, C. (2003). Irish primary principals’ professional learning: Problems and possibilities. Oideas, 50, 8–39.Google Scholar
  45. Sugrue, C. (2005). Being principal: Leadership insider out. In C. Sugrue (Ed.), Passionate principalship: Learning from the life histories of school leaders (pp. 135–157). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Sugrue, C., & Furlong, C. (2002). The cosmologies of Irish primary principals’ identities: Between the modern and the postmodern. International journal of Leadership in Education Theory and Practice, 5(3), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sugrue, C., & Solbrekke, T. D. (Eds.). (2011). Professional responsibility: New horizons of praxis. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Woods, P. (1984). Teaching for survival. In A. Hargeaves & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms and staffrooms: The sociology of teachers and teaching (pp. 48–63). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciaran Sugrue
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity College DublinBelfield, DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations