Advertisement

Leadership: Succession, Recruitment, Retirement

  • Ciaran Sugrue
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 20)

Abstract

Against an international backdrop of a ‘crisis’ in school leadership recruitment, exacerbated by a declining leadership talent pool, this chapter focuses on principals’ perspectives; the ‘real life’ stories behind the statistics regarding applications, and the extent to which systemically there is a need for a more radical re-think about leading schools. Informants appear relatively optimistic about the future, despite performativity and accountability yet there is concern about the duration spent at the helm, the inadequacy of current structures to enable principals to ‘step down’ and to facilitate mobility. Analysis reveals that in some respects principals are complicit in the perpetuation of outmoded practices, thus there emerges a need for a more systemic review of all aspects of leadership, its cultivation and renewal. These unique structural features within the Irish context have potential to contribute to international discourses on this increasingly important concern since in that context traditional practices continue relatively undisturbed. The purpose of this chapter is to contextualise recent literature with a view to providing more grounded perspectives; by surfacing the relationship between leadership practices and conceptualisation of roles and responsibilities and their systemic structures, it becomes evident the extent to which leadership capacity building is constrained and curtailed in the absence of addressing deeply embedded systemic structures; limited and limiting leadership rather than building leadership capacity (within and beyond school communities) while sustaining leaders and school leadership.

Keywords

School Leadership School Community Maternity Leave Leadership Practice Succession Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders gender, educational restructuring, and organizational change. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bullough, R. V., Jr. (1989). First-year teacher: A case study. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Coolahan, J., Hussey, C., & Kilfeather, F. (2012). The forum on patronage and pluralism in the primary sector report of the Forum’s Advisory Group. Dublin: DES.Google Scholar
  4. Day, C. (2007). What being a successful principal really means: International perspectives. Educational Leadership & Administration, 19(Fall), 13–24.Google Scholar
  5. Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kingston, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter connecting lives, work and effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Drudy, S. (2009). Recruitment to primary teaching in Ireland: A North/South comparative analysis. In S. Drudy (Ed.), Education in Ireland: Challenge and change. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Earley, P. (2004). Life after headship? Career stages and headteacher performance. Paper presented at the Belmas annual conference, Staffordshire.Google Scholar
  8. Foster, G., & Gunter, H. (2009). School leaders: Meeting the challenge of change. In C. Champan & H. Gunter (Eds.), Radical reforms: Perspectives on an era of educational change (pp. 66–79). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Government of Ireland. (1992). Education for a CHANGING WORLD Green paper on education. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  10. Gronn, P. (2009). Hybrid leadership. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 17–40). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Gronn, P., & Rawlings-Sanaei, F. (2003). Principals recruitment in a climate of leadership disengagement. Australian Journal of Education, 47(2), 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2005). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital transforming teaching in every school. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hobson, A., et al. (2003). Issues for early headship – Problems and support strategies. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  17. Hogan, P., & Dunne, J. (Eds.). (2004). Education and practice: Upholding the integrity of teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. IPPN. (2008). The challenge of recruiting, developing and retaining school leaders: IPPN position paper. Cork: IPPN.Google Scholar
  19. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. MacBeath, J., Gronn, P., Opfer, D., Lowden, K., Forde, C., Cowie, M., et al. (2009). The recruitment and retention of headteachers in Scotland (Report to the Scottish Government). Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  21. McGuinness, S. (2005). The recruitment and retention of school principals: The view from research. Paper presented at the International Confederation of Principals.Google Scholar
  22. NPC. (2013). A 2020 vision for education (Fís Don Oideachas 2020). Post primary education forum. Dublin: National Parents’ Council.Google Scholar
  23. NWCI. (2005). An accessible child care model. Dublin: National Women’s Council of Ireland (NWCI).Google Scholar
  24. OECD. (2008). Improving school leadership (Policy and practice, Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Pricewaterhouse Coopers. (2009). Leadership matters (Final Report): An empirical assessment of the attractiveness of the principalship in North of Ireland and the South of Ireland. Belfast: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP.Google Scholar
  26. Solbrekke, T. D., & Sugrue, C. (2014). Professional accreditation of initial teacher education programmes: Teacher Educators’ strategies – Between ‘accountability’ and ‘professional responsibility’? Teachers and Teacher Education, 37, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Spillane, J., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2009). School principals at work: A distributed perspective. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 87–110). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciaran Sugrue
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity College DublinBelfield, DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations