Skip to main content

Sign Functions in Natural and Artificial Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Handbook of Semiotics

Abstract

This chapter outlines a broad theory of sign use in natural and artificial systems that was developed over several decades within the context of theoretical biology, cybernetics, systems theory, biosemiotics, and neuroscience. Different conceptions of semiosis and information in nature are considered. General functional properties of and operations on signs, including measurement, computation, and sign-directed actions are described. A taxonomy of semiotic systems is built up from combinations of these operations. The respective functional organizations and informational capabilities of formal systems and computempiral-predictive scientific models, percept-action systems, purposive goal-seeking systems, and self-constructing systems are discussed. Semiotic relations are considered in terms of Morrisean semiotic triad of syntactics, semantics, and pragmatics. Analysis of statetransition structure is used to demarcate functional boundaries, such as epistemic and control cuts. Capabilities for open-ended behavior, combinatoric and emergent creativity, and umwelt expansion are taken up. Finally, basic problems of neurosemiotics, neural coding, and neurophenomenology are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the term “representation” advisedly, despite considerable unwanted implicit realist-referentialist philosophical baggage it carries from some sectors of cognitive science and philosophy (Bickhard and Terveen 1995). It is used here as in the neurosciences as a systematic set of distinctions, without any assumptions about what is being represented or signified, or the veridicality of the representation.

  2. 2.

    Inscription seen on an antinuclear poster produced by Hard Rain, Cambridge, MA, c. 1978.

  3. 3.

    The general concept, from theoretical biology, is related to self-reproducing automata (von Neumann 1948), metabolism-repair systems (Rosen 1991), autocatalytic sets, hypercycles, and hypersets. Regenerative networks also characterize brains (Cariani 2000b, 2001b) and social systems (Luhmann 2013), pp. 70–83.

  4. 4.

    This epistemic sense, which is agnostic regarding the world distal to measuring devices, is very different from the realist-referentialist sense of information as true knowledge about the world as it really is, e.g., Dretske 1981, i.e. knowledge that exists independently of observers and observations.

  5. 5.

    There are some substantial differences between Morrisean and Piercian semiotics in their descriptions of sign relations (see Brier 2008; Brier and Joslyn 2013; Ecco 1976; Nöth 1990; Queiroz et al. 2011; Vehkavaara 2008) for discussions. Although Pierce and Morris were both pragmatists—C. S. Pierce founded the movement—Piercian theory with its triad of signifier, referent, and interpretant is more compatible with realist ontologies, whereas the Morrissean triad is more compatible with epistemologies that are ontologically agnostic. These epistemological/ontological splits parallel pragmatistrealist debates in philosophy of science (van Fraassen 1980; Murdoch 1987).

  6. 6.

    For example, a switch that actuates a motor opens a drawbridge, the latter physical motions being nonsemiotic consequences of the switch sign state.

  7. 7.

    Analogous attempts have been made from within artificial intelligence and cognitive science frameworks to ground language meaning in the semiotics of percept-action cycles (Roy 2005).

  8. 8.

    Nowhere has this operational structure, which encompasses the roles of symbols, measurements, and mathematical computations, been more self-consciously and rigorously contemplated than in the late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century physics. Operationalist and realist accounts of scientific method contended, culminating in debates over the meaning of quantum mechanics (Murdoch 1987; van Fraassen 1980; Bridgman 1936). Parallel debates raged in the foundations of mathematics (Cariani 2012b).

  9. 9.

    While most attention has been paid to the formal parts of the modeling relation, the operational description of a scientific experiment also includes tacit physical actions that are only incompletely described (e.g., materials, skills, and work needed), that are needed to build measuring devices and set up experimental conditions (“preparing the system”).

  10. 10.

    Specification of the mode by a proposition that is to be evaluated returns us to a clear Kantian analytic-synthetic-practical distinction ( contra Quine).

  11. 11.

    We also reject the postmodernist construction of “technoscience,” which conflates science (successful understanding, empirical truths) with technology (successful action, pragmatic truths).

  12. 12.

    As von Neumann showed in 1932, one cannot completely eliminate measurements by successively subsuming them into the formal predictive model, for to do so leads to infinite regresses (von Neumann 1955). Therefore, the two kinds of operations are primitive: they complement each other.

  13. 13.

    Clear demarcations between semiotic functionalities are, therefore, only possible within the context of a particular, fixed observational frame. As with other foundational problems, ambiguity and indeterminacy can be replaced with clarity and consistency once operationalist definitions that specify methods of observation, calculation, and evaluation are adopted.

  14. 14.

    The semiotic operation of sign-initiated action (Fig. 2, left panel) describes some sign-directed process that activates effectors to act on the world outside the sign system. The ensuing world change is not semiotic, as it lies outside the functional boundaries of the sign system. If it were describable in semiotic terms, depending on whether it involved determinate or contingent STs, the process would respectively resemble either computation or measurement.

  15. 15.

    One does not create color vision by simply recombining feature primitives of monochromatic vision—new types of photoreceptors with differing wavelength sensitivities are needed. When new types of photoreceptors are introduced, then, in effect, another observable feature dimension is added to the internal sign states of the system.

  16. 16.

    As with the other functional distinctions, it is possible to develop clear, operational criteria for recognizing these two kinds of emergence. In the epistemological, observer-relative conception of emergence, called emergence relative to a model (Cariani 1989, 2012a; Rosen 1985), an emergent event occurs when the behavior of a system violates the observer's expectations; whether the observer can account for the change in terms of existing distinctions and processes, or whether new ones must be invoked distinguishes between combinatorial and creative processes.

  17. 17.

    We have worked on both NCCC and NCC problems, the neural coding of pitch (Cariani 1999) and neurocomputational requisites for awareness (Cariani 2000a, 2001b, 2012a), which we believe, entail autopoiesis-like mutual regeneration of sets of neuronal temporally coded spike pattern signals in global reentrant circuits.

References

  • Ackoff, Russell Lincoln, and F. E. Emery. 1972. On purposeful systems. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, Michael A. 1989. The metaphorical brain 2: Neural nets and beyond. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. Ross. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, Bernard J., and Nicole M. Gage. 2010. Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. 2nd ed. Burlington: Academic Press/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. 2003. The organic codes: An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. 2007. Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. 2008. Introduction to biosemiotics. 1st ed. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. 2013. The paradigms of biology. Biosemiotics 6:33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, Mark H., and Loren Terveen. 1995. Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, Margaret A. 2006. Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, David. 1981. Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, Edwin G. 1933. The physical dimensions of consciousness. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W. 1931. Dimensional analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W. 1936. The nature of physical theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, Søren. 2008. Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough! Toronto studies in semiotics and communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, Søren, and Cliff Joslyn. 2013. Information in biosemiotics: Introduction to the special issue. Biosemiotic 6:1–7. (Special issue on Information in Biosemiotics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, Claudia, M. T. Turvey, Peter N. Kugler, and Robert E. Shaw. 1984. Inadequacies of the computational metaphor. In Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, ed. M. Gazzaniga, 229–248. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 1989. On the design of devices with emergent semantic functions. Ph.D., State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, Peter. 1992. Emergence and artificial life. In Artificial life II. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, eds. C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer, and S. Rasmussen, Vol. X, 775–798. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, Peter. 1993. To evolve an ear: epistemological implications of Gordon Pask’s electrochemical devices. Systems Research 10 (3):19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 1995. As if time really mattered: Temporal strategies for neural coding of sensory information. Communication and Cognition—Artificial Intelligence (CC-AI) 12 (1–2):161–229. (Reprinted in: K Pribram, ed. Origins: Brain and Self-Organization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994; 1208–1252.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 1999. Temporal coding of periodicity pitch in the auditory system: An overview. Neural Plasticity 6 (4):147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2000a. Regenerative process in life and mind. In Closure: Emergent organizations and their dynamics, eds. Jerry L. R. Chandler, and Gertrudis Van de Vijver, 26–34. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2000b. Regenerative process in life and mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 901:26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2001a. Cybernetics and the semiotics of translation. In Lo Stesso Altro: Athanor: arte, letteratura, semiotica, filosofia, v. XII, n. 4, ed. S. Petrilli, Vol. 4, 256–273. Rome: Meltemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2001b. Symbols and dynamics in the brain. Biosystems 60 (1–3):59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2011. The semiotics of cybernetic percept-action systems. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 1 (1):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2012a. Creating new primitives in minds and machines. In Computers and Creativity, eds. Jon McCormack, and Mark D'Inverno, 395–430. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cariani, P. 2012b. Infinity and the observer: radical constructivism and the foundations of mathematics. Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1955. The philosophy of symbolic forms, Volume 1: Language. Trans. R. Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, Colin. 1966. On human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, Kenneth J. W. 1966. The nature of psychology: A selection of papers essays and other writings by Kenneth J. Craik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, Derek A. 2006. The primordial emotions: The dawning of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doya, Kenji. 2000. Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Current Opinion in Neurology 10:732–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. I. 1981. Knowledge & the Flow of Information. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecco, Humberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, Claus. 1994. The garden in the machine. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, Donald. 2008. The evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In Introduction to biosemiotics, ed. Marcello Barbieri, 1–67. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessard, A. E. 1954. Mechanisms of nervous integration and conscious experience. In Brain mechanisms and consciousness, eds. Edgar D. Adrian, Frederic Bremer, and Herbert H. Jasper, 200–236. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, Timothy, and Robert F. Port. 1995. It’s about time: An overview of the dynamical approach. In Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition, eds. Robert F. Port, and Timothy van Gelder, 1–44. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, Ernst. 1995. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Studies in mathematics education series, vol. 6. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, Ernst. 2007. Key works in radical constructivism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, James. 2011. The information: A history, a theory, a flood. New York: Parthenon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Daniel W. 1987. Aristotle’s two systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Thomas S. 1969. Ideas of life and matter: Studies in the history of general physiology, 600 B.C.–1900 A.D., (renamed Studies in the History…), 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42:335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, Heinrich. 1894. Principles of mechanics. New York: Dover (1956 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1996. Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2007. Semiotic scaffolding of living systems. In An Introduction to biosemiotics, ed. Marcello Barbieri, 149–166. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. 1890. The principles of psychology, Vols. I & II. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juarrero, Alicia. 1999. Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampis, George. 1991. Self-modifying systems in biology and cognitive science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmer, W., and W.S. McCulloch. 1969. The reticular formation command and control system. In Information processing in the nervous system, ed. K. N. Leibovic, 297–307. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Christof. 2004. The quest for consciousness: A neurobiological approach. Denver: Roberts & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, Wolfgang. 1947. Gestalt psychology. New York: Liverwright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Kalevi, Terrence Deacon, Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer, and Frederik Stjernfelt. 2010. Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory 4 (2):167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Susanne Katherina Knauth. 1967. Mind; An essay on human feeling. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Latil, Pierre. 1956. Thinking by machine. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2013. Introduction to systems theory. Trans. Peter Gilgen. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, Donald M. 1969. Information, mechanism and meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, Alfredo. 2011. Bioinformation as a triadic relation. In Information and living systems: Philosophical and scientific perspectives, eds. George Terzis, and Robert Arp, 55–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, Humberto R. 1981. Autopoiesis. In Autopoiesis: A theory of the living, ed. Milan Zeleny. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W. S. 1946. A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 7 (2):89–93. (Reprinted in McCulloch, W.S. Embodiments of Mind, MIT Press, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W. S. 1951. Why the mind is in the head. In Cerebral mechanisms of behavior (the hixon symposium), ed. L. A. Jeffress, 42–111. New York: Wiley. (Reprinted in Embodiments of Mind).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, Warren S. 1965. Embodiments of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, Richard. 1941. The basic works of aristotle. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1963. The structure of behavior (Trans. Alden L. Fisher). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, Claire E., and Claudia Carello. 1981. Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George A. 1951. Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, John. 1995. Self-producing systems. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modrak, Deborah K. 1987. Aristotle: The power of perception. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Charles. 1946. Signs, language, and behavior. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, Dugald. 1987. Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, John. 1948. Re-evaluation of the problems of complicated automata—problems of hierarchy and evolution. In Papers of John von Neumann on computing and computer theory (1987) , eds. William Aspray and Arthur Burks, 477–490. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, John. 1955. Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. 1958. The computer and the brain. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, Winfred. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, Gordon. 1959. Physical analogues to the growth of a concept. In Mechanization of thought processes, Vol II, 765–794. London: H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. 1972. Physical problems of decision-making constraints. International Journal of Neuroscience 3:99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. 2008. The necessity of biosemiotics: Matter-symbol complementarity. In Introduction to biosemiotics, ed. Marcello Barbieri, 115–132. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. 2012a. Laws, language and life Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols with contemporary commentary by Howard Pattee and Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. 2012b. Laws, language and life Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols with contemporary commentary by Howard Pattee and Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi. Biosemiotics, Vol. 7. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H.H. 2013. Epistemic, evolutionary, and physical conditions for biological information. Biosemiotic 6:9–31. (Special issue on Information in Biosemiotics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Stephen C. 1942. World hypotheses, a study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkell, D.H, and T.H. Bullock. 1968. Neural Coding. Neurosciences Research Program Bulletin 6 (3):221–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean. 1971. Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew. 2010. The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollen, D. A. 2011. On the emergence of primary visual perception. Cerebral cortex 21 (9):1941–1953. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, WIlliam. 1973. Behavior: The control of perception. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, Karl H. 1971. Languages of the brain; experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology. Prentice-Hall series in experimental psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, Joao, and Charbel Nino El-Hani. 2006. Semiosis as an emergent process. Transactions of the Charles S. Pierce Society 42 (6):78–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, Joao, Claus Emmeche, Kalevi Kull, and Charbel El-Hani. 2011. The biosemiotic approach in biology: Theoretical bases and applied methods. In Information and living systems: Philosophical and scientific perspectives, eds. George Terzis, and Robert Arp, 91–129. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke, F. D., Warland R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and W. Bialek. 1997. Spikes: exploring the neural code. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, David. 2006. Consciousness: Philosophical, psychological and neural theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert. 1985. Anticipatory systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Robert. 1991. Life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth, A., and N. Wiener. 1950. Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior. Philosophy of Science 17 (4):318–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth, Arturo, Norbert Wiener, and Julian Bigelow. 1943. Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science 10 (S):18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Deb. 2005. Semiotic schemas: A framework for grounding language in action and perception. Artificial Intelligence 167:170–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff, Gerd. 1974. Logic of the living brain. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troland, Leonard T. 1929. The principles of psychophysiology: A survey of modern scientific psychology, Vols I-III. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. 1926. Theoretical biology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, William R. 1972. Sensory coding: Selected readings. Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehkavaara, Tommi. 2008. From the logic of science to the logic of the living: the relevance of Charles Pierce to biosemiotics. In Introduction to biosemiotics, ed. Marcello Barbieri, 257–282. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Cariani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cariani, P. (2015). Sign Functions in Natural and Artificial Systems. In: Trifonas, P. (eds) International Handbook of Semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics