Aesthetics as an Emotional Activity That Facilitates Sense-Making: Towards an Enactive Approach to Aesthetic Experience
Nowadays, aesthetics are generally considered as a crucial aspect that affects the way we confront things, events, and states of affairs. However, the functional role of aesthetics in the interaction between agent and environment has not been addressed effectively. Our objective here is to provide an explanation concerning the role of aesthetics, and especially, of the aesthetic experience as a fundamental bodily and emotional activity in the respective interactions. An explanation of the functional role of the aesthetic experience could offer new orientations to our understanding of embodied cognition and of aesthetics as a fundamental part of it. We argue that aesthetic experience, especially its emotional dimension, is an evaluative process that influences the anticipation for stable and successful interactions with the environment. In other words, aesthetics facilitates sense-making as they affect what might be anticipated by an action tendency with respect to an environment.
KeywordsEnactivism Sense-making Emotions Embodied mind Human experience
A part of this work was accomplished when A.A. held a Marie Curie Research Fellowship (IEF-273635) at the Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, IAS-Research Centre for Life, Mind, and Society, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain. The authors would also like to thank Alfonsina Scarinzi for organizing this collection of book chapters.
- 1.Arnellos, A., T. Spyrou, and J. Darzentas. 2007. Exploring creativity in the design process: A systems-semiotic perspective. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 14(1): 37–64.Google Scholar
- 8.Bickhard, M.H. 2003. An integration of motivation and cognition. In Development and motivation: Joint perspectives, Monograph series II, ed. C.G. Rogers, L. Smith, and P. Tomlinson, 41–45. Leicester: British Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
- 17.Colombetti, G. 2010. Enaction, sense-making and emotion. In Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science, ed. J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E.A. Di Paolo, 145–164. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 18.Damasio, A. 2000. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
- 19.Desmet, P.M.A. 2007. Product emotion. In Product experience, ed. H.N.J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, 379–397. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- 21.Dewey, J. 1980. Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
- 22.Di Dio. C., and V. Gallese. 2009. Neuroaesthetics: A review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19(6): 682–687.Google Scholar
- 24.Freeman, W.J. 2000. Emotion is essential to all intentional behaviors. In Emotion, development, and self-organization, Cambridge studies in social and emotional development, ed. M.D. Lewis and I. Granic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Higgins, Kathleen. 2008. Refined emotion in aesthetic experience. In Aesthetic experience, ed. R. Shusterman and A. Tomlin, 106–125. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 30.James, W. 1890. The principles of psychology, Vol. 1, New York: Dover (Reissued, 1950).Google Scholar
- 31.Kant, I. 2000. In Critique of the power of judgment, 2nd ed, ed. P. Guyer. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?
- 33.Knight, F.H. 1964. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Sentry Press.Google Scholar
- 34.Levinson, J. 1997. Emotion in response to art a survey of the terrain. In Emotion and the arts, ed. M. Hjort and S. Laver, 20–34. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 36.Moreno, A., K. Ruiz-Mirazo, and X.E. Barandiaran. 2011. The impact of the paradigm of complexity on the foundational frameworks of biology and cognitive science. In Philosophy of complex systems, Handbook of the philosophy of science, ed. C. Hooker et al., 311–333. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Pessoa, L. 2010. Emergent processes in cognitive-emotional interactions. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 12(4): 433–448.Google Scholar
- 42.Prinz, J.J. 2004. Embodied emotions. In Thinking about feeling, contemporary philosophers on emotions, ed. R.C. Solomon, 44–58. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 44.Ramachandran, V.S., and W. Hirstein. 1999. The science of art a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6–7): 15–51.Google Scholar
- 46.Rolls, E.T. 1999. The brain and emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 48.Rolls, E.T. 2011. The origins of aesthetics: A neurobiological basis for affective feelings and aesthetics. In The aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology, ed. E. Schellekens and P. Goldie, 116–165. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 50.Schulkin, J. 2009. Aesthetic experience and the neurobiology of inquiry. In A companion to pragmatism, ed. J.R. Shook and J. Margolis, 352–360. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- 54.Shusterman, R. 2001. Pramgatism Dewey. In The Routledge companion to aesthetics, ed. D. Lopes and B. Gaut, 97–106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 56.Shusterman, R. 2008. Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 60.Stecker, R. 2010. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: An introduction, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- 61.Thompson, E. 2007. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- 62.Varela, F.J., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1993. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 64.Xenakis, I., and A. Arnellos. 2012. Reducing uncertainty in the design process: The role of aesthetics. In 8th international conference on design & emotion, ed. J. Brassett et al., 8. London: Central Saint Martins University of the Arts London and the Design and Emotion Society.Google Scholar
- 66.Xenakis, I., and A. Arnellos. 2014. Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: A naturalistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01038.
- 68.Xenakis, I., A. Arnellos, T. Spyrou, and J. Darzentas. 2012. Modelling aesthetic judgment: An interactive-semiotic perspective. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 19(3): 25–51.Google Scholar