Aesthetics as an Emotional Activity That Facilitates Sense-Making: Towards an Enactive Approach to Aesthetic Experience

Chapter

Abstract

Nowadays, aesthetics are generally considered as a crucial aspect that affects the way we confront things, events, and states of affairs. However, the functional role of aesthetics in the interaction between agent and environment has not been addressed effectively. Our objective here is to provide an explanation concerning the role of aesthetics, and especially, of the aesthetic experience as a fundamental bodily and emotional activity in the respective interactions. An explanation of the functional role of the aesthetic experience could offer new orientations to our understanding of embodied cognition and of aesthetics as a fundamental part of it. We argue that aesthetic experience, especially its emotional dimension, is an evaluative process that influences the anticipation for stable and successful interactions with the environment. In other words, aesthetics facilitates sense-making as they affect what might be anticipated by an action tendency with respect to an environment.

Keywords

Enactivism Sense-making Emotions Embodied mind Human experience 

References

  1. 1.
    Arnellos, A., T. Spyrou, and J. Darzentas. 2007. Exploring creativity in the design process: A systems-semiotic perspective. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 14(1): 37–64.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnellos, A., T. Spyrou, and J. Darzentas. 2010. Towards the naturalization of agency based on an interactivist account of autonomy. New Ideas in Psychology 28(3): 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahm, A.J. 1947. Beauty defined. Philosophical Review 56(5): 582–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagozzi, R., H. Baumgartner, and R. Pieters. 1998. Goal-directed emotions. Cognition and Emotion 12(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barandiaran, X.E., and A. Moreno. 2008. Adaptivity: From metabolism to behavior. Adaptive Behavior 16(5): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumeister, R.F., et al. 2007. How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11(2): 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bickhard, M.H. 2000. Motivation and emotion: An interactive process model. In The caldron of consciousness: Motivation, affect and self-organization, ed. R.D. Ellis and N. Newton, 161–178. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bickhard, M.H. 2003. An integration of motivation and cognition. In Development and motivation: Joint perspectives, Monograph series II, ed. C.G. Rogers, L. Smith, and P. Tomlinson, 41–45. Leicester: British Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bickhard, M.H. 2006. Developmental normativity and normative development. In Norms in human development, ed. L. Smith and J. Voneche, 57–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bickhard, M.H., and R.L. Campbell. 1996. Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2): 111–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brehm, J.W., A.M. Miron, and K. Miller. 2009. Affect as a motivational state. Cognition and Emotion 23(6): 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Budd, M. 2007. The intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 47(4): 333–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carver, Charles S. 2001. Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(4): 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carver, Charles. 2003. Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion 17(2): 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chatterjee, A. 2011. Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(1): 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coleman, F.J. 1971. Is aesthetic pleasure a myth? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29(3): 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colombetti, G. 2010. Enaction, sense-making and emotion. In Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science, ed. J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E.A. Di Paolo, 145–164. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Damasio, A. 2000. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desmet, P.M.A. 2007. Product emotion. In Product experience, ed. H.N.J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, 379–397. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dewey, J. 1929. Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin, LTD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dewey, J. 1980. Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Di Dio. C., and V. Gallese. 2009. Neuroaesthetics: A review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19(6): 682–687.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Di Paolo, E.A. 2005. Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freeman, W.J. 2000. Emotion is essential to all intentional behaviors. In Emotion, development, and self-organization, Cambridge studies in social and emotional development, ed. M.D. Lewis and I. Granic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grabenhorst, F., and E.T. Rolls. 2011. Value, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(2): 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hampton, A.N., et al. 2007. Contributions of the amygdala to reward expectancy and choice signals in human prefrontal cortex. Neuron 55(4): 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heilman, R.M., et al. 2010. Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion 10(2): 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Higgins, Kathleen. 2008. Refined emotion in aesthetic experience. In Aesthetic experience, ed. R. Shusterman and A. Tomlin, 106–125. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ishizu, T., and S. Zeki. 2011. Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE 6(7): e21852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    James, W. 1890. The principles of psychology, Vol. 1, New York: Dover (Reissued, 1950).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kant, I. 2000. In Critique of the power of judgment, 2nd ed, ed. P. Guyer. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?
  32. 32.
    Kawabata, H., and S. Zeki. 2004. Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology 91(4): 1699–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Knight, F.H. 1964. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Sentry Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levinson, J. 1997. Emotion in response to art a survey of the terrain. In Emotion and the arts, ed. M. Hjort and S. Laver, 20–34. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Levinson, J. 2005. Philosophical aesthetics: An overview. In The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, ed. J. Levinson, 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moreno, A., K. Ruiz-Mirazo, and X.E. Barandiaran. 2011. The impact of the paradigm of complexity on the foundational frameworks of biology and cognitive science. In Philosophy of complex systems, Handbook of the philosophy of science, ed. C. Hooker et al., 311–333. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nelissen, R.M.A., A.J.M. Dijker, and N.K. de Vries. 2007. Emotions and goals: Assessing relations between values and emotions. Cognition and Emotion 21(4): 902–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paton, J.J., et al. 2006. The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning. Nature 439(7078): 865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pessoa, L. 2010. Emergent processes in cognitive-emotional interactions. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 12(4): 433–448.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pessoa, L. 2008. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9(2): 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Porr, B., and F. Wörgötter. 2005. Inside embodiment – What means embodiment to radical constructivists? Kybernetes 34(1/2): 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Prinz, J.J. 2004. Embodied emotions. In Thinking about feeling, contemporary philosophers on emotions, ed. R.C. Solomon, 44–58. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pugh, G.E. 1979. Values and the theory of motivation. Zygon 14(1): 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ramachandran, V.S., and W. Hirstein. 1999. The science of art a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6–7): 15–51.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rasmussen, H.N., et al. 2006. Self-regulation processes and health: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment. Journal of Personality 74(6): 1721–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rolls, E.T. 1999. The brain and emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rolls, E.T. 2004. The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition 55(1): 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rolls, E.T. 2011. The origins of aesthetics: A neurobiological basis for affective feelings and aesthetics. In The aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology, ed. E. Schellekens and P. Goldie, 116–165. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rolls, E.T., and F. Grabenhorst. 2008. The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: From affect to decision-making. Progress in Neurobiology 86(3): 216–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schulkin, J. 2009. Aesthetic experience and the neurobiology of inquiry. In A companion to pragmatism, ed. J.R. Shook and J. Margolis, 352–360. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schwarz, N. 2000. Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion 14(4): 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schoenbaum, G., A.A. Chiba, and M. Gallagher. 1998. Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learning. Nature Neuroscience 1(2): 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shusterman, R. 1998. Interpretation, pleasure, and value in aesthetic experience. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56(1): 51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shusterman, R. 2001. Pramgatism Dewey. In The Routledge companion to aesthetics, ed. D. Lopes and B. Gaut, 97–106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shusterman, R. 2006. Aesthetic experience: From analysis to Eros. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64(2): 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shusterman, R. 2008. Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shusterman, R. 2011. The pragmatist aesthetics of William James. British Journal of Aesthetics 51(4): 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Spackman, M.P., and D. Miller. 2008. Embodying emotions: What emotion theorists can learn from simulations of emotions. Minds and Machines 18(3): 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stapleton, M. 2013. Steps to a “Properly Embodied” cognitive science. Cognitive Systems Research 22–23: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stecker, R. 2010. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: An introduction, 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Thompson, E. 2007. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Varela, F.J., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1993. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Weber, A., and F.J. Varela. 2002. Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(2): 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xenakis, I., and A. Arnellos. 2012. Reducing uncertainty in the design process: The role of aesthetics. In 8th international conference on design & emotion, ed. J. Brassett et al., 8. London: Central Saint Martins University of the Arts London and the Design and Emotion Society.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Xenakis, I., and A. Arnellos. 2013. The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Design Studies 34(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Xenakis, I., and A. Arnellos. 2014. Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: A naturalistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01038.
  67. 67.
    Xenakis, I., A. Arnellos, and J. Darzentas. 2012. The functional role of emotions in aesthetic judgment. New Ideas in Psychology 30(2): 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xenakis, I., A. Arnellos, T. Spyrou, and J. Darzentas. 2012. Modelling aesthetic judgment: An interactive-semiotic perspective. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 19(3): 25–51.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yoshida, W., and S. Ishii. 2006. Resolution of uncertainty in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 50(5): 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Product and Systems Design EngineeringUniversity of the AegeanSyrosGreece
  2. 2.International center for advanced studies in theoretical biologyKLI InstituteKlosterneuburgAustria

Personalised recommendations