Abstract
Consistently with Cassman’s (1999) original wording, ecological intensification is commonly defined as the imperative to attain high productivity per surface area unit and per time unit with a concomitant “ecological” commitment to protect the environment. For most authors who subscribe to this concept the principle of mobilizing ecosystem processes that support and regulate primary production is the key to overcoming this challenge (Egger 1987; Breman and Sissoko 1998; Affholder et al. 2008; Chevassus-au-Louis and Griffon 2008; Bonny 2011; Doré et al. 2011; Bommarco et al. 2013; Hochman et al. 2013). By accepting this sense, we are justified in using the expressions “ecological intensification” and “ecologically intensive agriculture” interchangeably, with the latter expression suggesting more explicitly the forceful mobilization of ecological processes for high yields, and not simply the search for a combination of increased intensification and low environmental impact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Or at least for farming systems where yields and the use of exogenous inputs are both low – which does not prevent them from being very intensive in labor, in knowledge or in the mobilization of ecological processes.
References
Affholder, F. (1997). Empirically modelling the interaction between intensification and climatic risk in semiarid regions. Field Crops Research, 52, 79–93.
Affholder, F., Jourdain, D., Morize, M., Quang, D. D., & Ricome, A. (2008). Éco-intensification dans les montagnes du Vietnam. Contraintes à l’adoption de la culture sur couvertures végétales. Cahiers Agricultures, 17, 289–296.
Affholder, F., Jourdain, D., Quang, D. D., Tuong, T. P., Morize, M., & Ricome, A. (2010). Constraints to farmers’ adoption of direct-seeding mulch-based cropping systems: A farm scale modeling approach applied to the mountainous slopes of Vietnam. Agricultural Systems, 103, 51–62.
Andriarimalala, J. H., Rakotozandriny, J. N., Andriamandroso, A. L. H., Penot, E., Naudin, K., Dugue, P., Tillard, E., Decruyenaere, V., & Salgado, P. (2013). Creating synergies between conservation agriculture and cattle production in crop-livestock farms: A study case in the lake Alaotra region of Madagascar. Experimental Agriculture, 49, 352–365.
Bainville, S., Affholder, F., Figuié, M., & Madeira, N. J. (2005). Les transformations de l’agriculture familiale de la commune de Silvânia: Une petite révolution agricole dans les Cerrados brésiliens. Cahiers Agricultures, 14, 103–110.
Baldé, A. B., Scopel, E., Affholder, F., Corbeels, M., Silva, F. A. M. D., Xavier, J. H. V., & Wery, J. (2011). Agronomic performance of no-tillage relay intercropping with maize under smallholder conditions in Central Brazil. Field Crops Research, 124, 240–251.
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2009). L’approche expérimentale en économie du développement. Revue d'Economie Politique, 119, 691–726.
Bergen, S. D., Bolton, S. M., & Fridley, L. J. (2001). Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 18, 201–210.
Blanchart, E., Bernoux, M., Sarda, X., Siqueira, N. M., Cerri, C. C., Piccolo, M. D. C., Douzet, J.-M., & Scopel, E. (2007). Effect of direct seeding mulch-based systems on soil carbon storage and macrofauna in Central Brazil. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 72, 81–87.
Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., & Potts, S. G. (2013). Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28, 230–238.
Bonny, S. (2011). L’agriculture écologiquement intensive: Nature et défis. Cahiers Agricultures, 20(6), 451–462.
Breman, H., & Sissoko, K. (1998). L’intensification agricole au Sahel (1000 pp.). Paris: Économie et développement, Karthala.
Carberry, P. S., Liang, W. -L., Twomlow, S., Holzworth, D. P., Dimes, J. P., McClelland, T., Huth, N. I., Chen, F., Hochman, Z., & Keating, B. A. (2013). Scope for improved eco-efficiency varies among diverse cropping systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8381–8386.
Cassman, K. G. (1999). Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. National Academy of Sciences Colloquium, 96, 5952–5959.
Chevassus-au-Louis, B., & Griffon, M. (2008). La nouvelle modernité: Une agriculture productive à haute valeur écologique. Déméter, Économie et stratégies agricoles, 14, 7–48.
Dalgaard, T., Hutchings, N. J., & Porter, J. R. (2003). Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 100, 39–51.
Demont, M., Jouve, P., Stessens, J., & Tollens, E. (2007). Boserup versus Malthus revisited: Evolution of farming systems in northern Cote d’Ivoire. Agricultural Systems, 93, 215–228.
Doré, T., Makowski, D., Malézieux, E., Munier-Jolain, N., Tchamitchian, M., & Tittonell, P. (2011). Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 197–210.
Egger, K. (1987). L’intensification écologique conservation (LAE) et amélioration des sols tropicaux par les systèmes agro-sylvo-pastoraux. Aménagements hydro-agricoles et systèmes de production, Montpellier, Cirad-DSA. Documents systèmes agraires, 2(6), 129–135.
Francis, C., Breland, T. A., Østergaard, E., Lieblein, G., & Morse, S. (2013). Phenomenon-based learning in agroecology: A prerequisite for transdisciplinarity and responsible action. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(1), 60–75.
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research, 114, 23–34.
Giller, K. E., Corbeels, M., Nyamangara, J., Triomphe, B., Affholder, F., Scopel, E., & Tittonell, P. (2011). A research agenda to explore the role of conservation agriculture in African smallholder farming systems. Field Crops Research, 124, 468–472.
Hochman, Z., Carberry, P. S., Robertson, M. J., Gaydon, D. S., Bell, L. W., & McIntosh, P. C. (2013). Prospects for ecological intensification of Australian agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 44, 109–123.
Jagoret, P., Michel-Dounias, I., & Malézieux, E. (2011). Long-term dynamics of cocoa agroforests: A case study in central Cameroon. Agroforestry Systems, 81, 267–278.
Jamont, M., Piva, G., & Fustec, J. (2013). Sharing N resources in the early growth of rapeseed intercropped with faba bean: Does N transfer matter? Plant Soil, 371, 641–653.
MacMynowski, D. P. (2007). Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society, 12, 14.
Maris, V. (2010). Philosophie de la biodiversité: Petite éthique pour une nature en péril (214 pp.). Buchet-Chastel.
Méndez, V. E., & Bacon, C. M. (2013). Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 3–18.
Naiman, R. J. (1999). A perspective on interdisciplinary science. Ecosystems, 2, 292–295.
Parks, S., & Gowdy, J. (2013). What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosystem Services, 3, e1–e10.
Penot, É., Macdowall, C., & Domas, R. (2012). Modeling impact of conservation agriculture adoption on farming systems agricultural incomes. The case of lake Alaotra Region, Madagascar (9 pp.). RIME-PAMPA/CA2AFRICA project. Denmark: IFSA.
Rapidel, B., DeClerck, F., Le Coq, J. -F., & Beer, J. (2011). Ecosystem services from agriculture and agroforestry: Measurement and payment (XIX-414 pp.). London: Earthscan Publications.
Ratnadass, A., Michellon, R., Randriamanantsoa, R., & Séguy, L. (2006). Effects of soil and plant management on crop pests and diseases. In N. Uphoff, A. Ball, E. Fernandes, H. Herren, O. Husson, M. Laing, C. Palm, J. Pretty, P. Sanchez, N. Sanginga, & J. Thies (Eds.), Biological Approaches for Sustainable Soil Systems (pp. 589–602). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Ratnadass, A., Blanchart, E., & Lecomte, P. (2013a). Ecological interactions within the biodiversity of cultivated systems. In É. Hainzelin (Ed.), Cultivating biodiversity to transform agriculture (pp. 141–180). Versailles: Quæ/Springer.
Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., Nyamangara, J., & Giller, K. E. (2012). Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Research, 136, 12–22.
Scopel, E., Triomphe, B., Affholder, F., Macena da Silva, F. A., Corbeels, M., Xavier, J. H. V., Lahmar, R., Recous, S., Bernoux, M., Blanchart, E., Mendes, I. D. C., & Tourdonnet, S. D. (2012). Conservation agriculture cropping systems in temperate and tropical conditions, performances and impacts. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33, 113–130.
Torquebiau, E. F. (2000). A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences, Série III Sciences de la vie, 323, 1009–1017.
Vakulabharanam, V. (2013). Fighting poverty through good governance using randomized experiments. Development and Change, 44(4), 1027–1037.
Wegner, G., & Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 21, 492–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Éditions Quæ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Affholder, F., Parrot, L., Jagoret, P. (2015). Lessons and Perspectives of Ecological Intensification. In: Sourisseau, JM. (eds) Family Farming and the Worlds to Come. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9358-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9358-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9357-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9358-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)