Skip to main content

Against Narrativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Narrative, Philosophy and Life

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life ((BSPR,volume 2))

  • 1386 Accesses

Abstract

This essay attempts to sort out what is at stake in some of the quite different claims made on behalf of narrative: for example, the difference between the empirical claim that we happen to be creatures who understand ourselves through stories and the essentially normative claim made, for example, by Taylor, that it is a “basic condition of making sense of ourselves… that we grasp our lives in a narrative.” The essay argues that that the boldest earlier claims for narrative failed to take into account a distinction between the perspectives of narrativists and episodists—the former tending to construe a temporal integrity through numerous life events and the latter inevitably unable to see life as more than a series of disconnected episodes.

From Galen Strawson, Real Materialism and Other Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008) [first published in Ratio, 2004].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sartre 1938.

  2. 2.

    See e.g. 100 CE: 214–17 (473B–474B).

  3. 3.

    1915: 562–3.

  4. 4.

    The Episodic/Diachronic distinction is not the same thing as the Narrative/non-Narrative distinction, as will emerge; but there are marked correlations between them.

  5. 5.

    Although a culture could in theory exert significant selective pressure on a psychological trait. For descriptions of revenge cultures see Blumenfeld 2003.

  6. 6.

    1989: 239. See also the remarkable Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa (1888–1935) an extreme Episodic: ‘I always feel as if I’ve just been born/Into an endlessly new world’ (1914: 48).

  7. 7.

    The sense of perpetual beginning is not at all a sense of perpetual inchoateness. That which is always launching out may be well or strongly formed and may be felt to be. Updike also talks in a Narrative fashion of our ‘religious persistence, against all the powerful post-Copernican, post-Darwinian evidence that we are insignificant accidents within a vast uncaused churning, in feeling that our life is a story, with a pattern and a moral and an inevitability’ (1989: 216); and although this has no resonance for some, it fulfils a powerful psychological need in many and is common.

  8. 8.

    I hope to discuss this in Life in Time. For a sketch, see Strawson 1997: §9.

  9. 9.

    As noted, this difference tends to run alongside the difference between Narratives and non-Narratives, but is certainly not coextensive with it.

  10. 10.

    Cf. e.g. Heidegger 1927.

  11. 11.

    1910: 91.

  12. 12.

    In an earlier published version of this paper I classified Joseph Conrad as Narrative, and this was cogently questioned by John Attridge in the Letters column of the Times Literary Supplement (10 December 2004). In his ‘personal remembrance’ of Conrad, Ford Madox Ford observes that ‘Conrad had very strongly the idea of the Career. A career was for him something a little sacred: any career .... A frame of mind, a conception of life, according to which a man did not take stock of the results of his actions upon himself, as it were at long range, was something that he had never contemplated’ (1924: 130–5). It seems, though, that this was an effort that Conrad made, something that did not flow from any natural Narrativity, something learnt, like the neatness of sailors, to which Ford compares it. Attridge notes Conrad’s ‘youthful indifference to the overall plot of his existence’, and quotes Conrad’s judgement of his youthful self as ‘not having any notion of life as an enterprise that could be mismanaged’.

  13. 13.

    The term ‘I*’ and its cognates can function in phenomenological contexts to convey the content of a form of experience that incorporates the presumption whether or not the presumption is actually correct. I’ll omit the ‘*’ when it’s not necessary.

  14. 14.

    It does not have any sort of ‘from-the-outside’ character (that would be a bit like my seeing a film of myself falling taken by a third party).

  15. 15.

    1938: 64. Sartre is as much concerned with relatively short-term passages of life as with life as a whole.

  16. 16.

    Sacks 1985: 110; Bruner 1987: 11, 15, 12; 1994: 53.

  17. 17.

    Dennett (1988), Times Literary Supplement, 16–22 September.

  18. 18.

    Schechtman 1996: 93, 119.

  19. 19.

    1989: 47, 52.

  20. 20.

    1989: 51–2. I reject the ‘because’ and the second ‘hence’.

  21. 21.

    1989: 52.

  22. 22.

    1990: 158.

  23. 23.

    Excessive self-concern is much more likely to be the cause of religious belief in someone who has come to religion than in someone who has been born into it. That does not change the fact that religious belief in general, ostensibly self-denying, is one of the fundamental vehicles of human narcissism.

  24. 24.

    1981: 203–4.

  25. 25.

    One problem with it, and it is a deep problem, is that one is almost certain to get one’s ‘story’ wrong, in some more or less sentimental way—unless, perhaps, one has the help of a truly gifted therapist.

  26. 26.

    1994: 190.

  27. 27.

    1960: 9–10. Pessoa also experiences himself as not really having or being a specific self at all, and this feature, valued in many religious traditions, may well be positively correlated with Episodicity when it occurs naturally. Pessoa, however, experiences himself as multiply personalitied, and this is quite another matter.

  28. 28.

    Shaftesbury 1698–1712: 136–7; Epictetus is an important influence.

  29. 29.

    Taylor is explicit that it is when I am not ‘dealing with such trivial questions as where I shall go in the next five minutes but with the issue of my place relative to the good’, that ‘making sense of my present action requires a narrative understanding of my life’ (1989: 48).

  30. 30.

    I think this may be the greatest single source of unhappiness in human intercourse.

  31. 31.

    There are, however, many interesting complications. See Life in Time.

  32. 32.

    MacIntyre does not in the passages I have quoted explicitly say that the narrativity of a life requires Narrativity. In After Virtue he is particularly concerned with the idea that ‘to think of a human life as a narrative unity is to think in a way alien to the dominant individualist and bureaucratic modes of modern culture’ (1981: 211), and this remark was principally a criticism—an excellent one—of the social sciences of the time.

  33. 33.

    From now on I will omit the qualification about ‘parts of one’s life’ and take it as read.

  34. 34.

    ‘Discern’, ‘apprehend’, ‘find’, ‘detect’ all have non-factive readings.

  35. 35.

    Hubbard 1909: 32.

  36. 36.

    I judge Stendhal to be strongly Episodic but subject to Diachronic flashes. Jack Kerouac is I think a clear case of an Episodic looking for larger form. There are also clear elements of this in Malcolm Lowry. Laurence Sterne makes comedy out of Episodicity. Jerry Fodor cites Anthony Powell, whom I have not read, as a fine example of an Episodic aspiring to Narrativity.

  37. 37.

    It’s well known that fully conscious lies can forget their origins and come to be fully believed by their perpetrators.

  38. 38.

    For good discussions, see e.g. Brewer 1988; McCauley 1988.

  39. 39.

    Cf. e.g. Bruner 1987, 1990, 1994. The notion of an ‘unreliable narrator’ derives from literary criticism. In The Mind’s Past (1998a) Gazzaniga seems to support a strongly reconstructive view of human memory, but he later says only that personal memory tends to be ‘a bit fictional’ (1998b: 713).

  40. 40.

    Brewer (1988) argues that the evidence that supports ‘the reconstructive view of personal memory does not seem very compelling’. See also Wagenaar 1994; Baddeley 1994: 239; Swann 1990. Ross (1989) argues that revision that seems to serve self-esteem may be motivated by nothing more than a concern for consistency.

  41. 41.

    1886: §68.

  42. 42.

    Perhaps ‘confabulation’ in patients with Korsakov’s syndrome is an extreme and pathological example of revision. See e.g. Sacks 1985; Gazzaniga 1998a.

  43. 43.

    Brewer 1988: 27. Cf. Neisser 1981.

  44. 44.

    See e.g. Pillemer 1998: ch. 2.

  45. 45.

    For more formal evidence, cf. e.g. Wagenaar 1994, ‘Is memory self-serving?’.

  46. 46.

    Even if we did all tend to see our lives in a favourable light, it would not follow that we were all revisers: some will have self-favouring, self-respect-preserving justifications of their actions already in place at the time of action, and so have no need for subsequent revision.

  47. 47.

    Malamud 1979.

  48. 48.

    1991: 418; my emphasis. Dennett takes the story to be primarily about who we are, and to that extent it seems that the word ‘account’ would do as well as ‘story’, even though it will refer to particular events in one’s life.

  49. 49.

    Schechtman 1996: 96. This is a strong expression of her view, which has usefully weaker forms (cf. e.g. pp. 117, 159).

  50. 50.

    1996: 117.

  51. 51.

    See McCrone 2003; Debiec et al. 2002.

  52. 52.

    Blattner 1999: 32, 41; I substitute ‘one’ for ‘Dasein’. Cf. Heidegger (1927: 344): ‘In the light of the “for-the-sake-of-which” of one’s self-chosen ability-to-be, resolute Dasein frees itself for its world.’

  53. 53.

    Matthew vi. 34. This way of being in the present has nothing to do with the ‘aesthetic’ way of being in the present described and condemned by Kierkegaard.

  54. 54.

    Note, though, how Tom Bombadil in The Lord of the Rings can produce a certain anxiety.

  55. 55.

    1563–1592: 32.

  56. 56.

    Op. cit. p. 33. ‘A second advantage’ of poor memory, he goes on to note, ‘is that I remember less any insults received’.

  57. 57.

    Wilkes 1998.

  58. 58.

    Pritchett 1979: 47. I am grateful to audiences in Oxford (1999), Rutgers (2000), and Reading (2003) for their comments and to Alan Jenkins at the Times Literary Supplement.

References

  • Baddeley A (1994) The remembered self and the enacted self. In: Neisser U, Fivush R (eds) The remembering self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattner W (1999) Heidegger’s temporal idealism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld L (2003) Revenge: a story of hope. Washington Square Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer WF (1988) Memory for randomly sampled autobiographical events. In: Neisser U, Winograd E (eds) Remembering reconsidered: ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1987) Life as narrative. Soc Res 54:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1990) Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1994) The ‘remembered self’. In: Neisser U, Fivush R (eds) The remembering self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J (1994) Past, space and self. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montaigne M (1991) The complete essays (trans: Screech MA). Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Debiec J, Ledoux J, Nader K (2002) Cellular and systems reconsolidation in the hippocampus. Neuron 36(3):527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (1988) Why everyone is a novelist. Times Literary Supplement, 16–22 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D (1991) Consciousness explained. Little Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford FM (1924/1989) Joseph Conrad. A personal remembrance. Ecco Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga M (1998a) The mind’s past. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga M (1998b) The neural Platonist. J Conscious Stud 5:706–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1927/1962) Being and time. In: Macquarrie J, Robinson E (eds). Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard E (1909) Article in philistine

    Google Scholar 

  • James H (1864–1915/1999) In: Horne P (ed) Henry James: a life in letters. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1981) After virtue. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud B (1979) Dubin’s lives. Farrar Straus & Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley RN (1988) Walking in our own footsteps: autobiographical memory and reconstruction. In: Neisser U, Winograd E (eds) Remembering reconsidered: ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrone J (2003) New Scientist, May 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U (1981) John Dean’s memory: a case study. Cognition 9:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche (1886) Beyond good and evil (Jenseits von Gut und Böse). Naumann, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa F (1914/1998) Fernando Pessoa & Co., selected poems. In: Zenith R (ed). Grove Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer D (1998) Momentous events, vivid memories: how unforgettable moments help us understand the meaning of our lives. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch (c.100 CE/1939) On tranquillity of mind. In: Plutarch, Moralia VI (trans: Helmbold WC). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees G (1960) A bundle of sensations. Chatto & Windus, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (1990/1992) Personal identity and narrative identity. In: Ricoeur P (ed) Oneself as another (trans: Blamey K). University of Chicago Press, Chicago Bla

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilke RM (1910/1983) The notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge (trans: Mitchell S). Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross M (1989) Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychol Rev 96:341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks O (1985) The man who mistook his wife for a hat. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre J-P (1938/1996) La Nausee. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman M (1996) The constitution of selves. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaftesbury, Earl of (1698–1712/1900) Philosophical regimen. In: Rand B (ed) The life, unpublished letters and philosophical regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson G (1997) The self. J Conscious Stud 4:405–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann WB (1990) To be adored or to be known: the interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In: Sorrentino RM, Higgins ET (eds) Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior, vol 2. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1989) Sources of the self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Updike J (1989) Self-consciousness. Deutsch, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar W (1994) Is memory self-serving? In: Neisser U, Fivush R (eds) The remembering self: construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes K (1998) ΓΝΩΘΙ ΣΕΑΥΤΟΝ (Know thyself). J Conscious Stud 5:153–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Galen Strawson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strawson, G. (2015). Against Narrativity. In: Speight, A. (eds) Narrative, Philosophy and Life. Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9349-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics