Advertisement

The Disaster Epidemic: Research, Diagnosis, and Prescriptions

  • Thea Dickinson
  • Ian Burton
Chapter

Abstract

This paper explores the reasons for the rapid increase in number of disasters and disaster losses over the past few decades. It explains why disasters can no longer be regarded as unique events specific to particular places, but often have widespread consequences far beyond the initial location of the triggering events. It is proposed that apparently independent events are connected by sharing some root causes in common. The metaphor of “epidemic” is used to suggest approaches than can be used to identify root causes and to begin to address them. This takes disaster risk reduction and management a stage further than reliance on attempts to reduce exposure and vulnerability, and seeks to find the common underlying causes. As the 10 year life of the Hyogo Framework for Action ends in 2015 there is an opportunity to develop a new forensic approach to investigations of disasters and to bring about a substantial paradigm shift in disaster risk management that places more emphasis on common responsibilities and integrated approaches in the context of more sustainable development.

Keywords

Disaster Risk Climate Change Adaptation Disaster Risk Reduction Anthropogenic Climate Change Disaster Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahmed, S., P.K. Bardhan, A. Iqbal, R.N. Mazumder, A.I. Khan, M.S. Islam, and A. Cravioto. 2011. The 2008 cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe: Experience of the icddr,b team in the field. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 29(5): 541–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burton, I. 2010. Forensic disaster investigations in depth: A new case study model. Environment 52(5): 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers, K. 2009. Zimbabwe’s battle against cholera. Lancet 373(9668): 993–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Funabashi, H. 2012. Why the Fukushima nuclear disaster is a man-made calamity. International Journal of Japanese Sociology 21(1): 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glantz, M.H. 2008. Hurricane Katrina as a ‘teachable moment’. Advances in Geosciences 14: 287–294. Accessible at: http://www.adv-geosci.net/14/287/2008/.
  6. Grossi, P., and R. Muir-Wood. 2006. Flood risk in New Orleans: Implications for future management and insurability. London: Risk Management Solutions.Google Scholar
  7. IDNDR. 1992. Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. United Nations. Geneva: DHA/IDNDR.Google Scholar
  8. Integrated Research on Disaster Risk. 2011. Forensic investigations of disasters: The FORIN project, IRDR FORIN publication no. 1. Beijing: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk.Google Scholar
  9. IPCC. 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kates, R.W., C.E. Colten, S. Laska, and S.P. Leatherman. 2006. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(40): 14653–14660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mason, P.R. 2009. Zimbabwe experiences the worst epidemic of cholera in Africa. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 3(2): 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MunichRe. 2012. Review of natural catastrophes in 2011: Earthquakes result in record loss year. Reinsurance Press release, 4 January 2012. http://www.munichre.com/en/media_relations/press_releases/2012/2012_01_04_press_release.aspx.
  13. Musemwa, M. 2010. From ‘sunshine city’ to a landscape of disaster: The politics of water, sanitation and disease in Harare, Zimbabwe, 1980–2009. Journal of Developing Societies 26(2): 165–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelson, E.J., J.B. Harris, J.G. Morris Jr., S.B. Calderwood, and A. Camilli. 2009. Cholera transmission: The host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic. Nature Reviews Microbiology 7(10): 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. UNISDR. 2004. Guidelines for mainstreaming disaster risk assessment in development, disaster risk reduction for sustainable development in Africa. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.Google Scholar
  16. UNISDR. 2011. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.Google Scholar
  17. UNISDR. 2012. Towards a post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/files/25129_towardsapost2015frameworkfordisaste.pdf.
  18. White, G. 1945. Human adjustment to floods, Department of Geography research paper no. 29. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  19. WHO. 2009. Cholera in Zimbabwe – Update 4. Global Alert and Response (GAR). http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_06_09/en/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of the EnvironmentUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations