Skip to main content

Visual-Object Versus Visual-Spatial Representations: Insights from Studying Visualization in Artists and Scientists

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity

Abstract

This paper aims at to demonstrate that visual-object processing can support abstract visual-object representation in the same way as visual-spatial processing supports abstract visual-spatial representations, and that the visual representations contained in abstract art indeed constitute a unique and meaningful symbolic system, irreducible to that used in the visual-spatial domain. Specifically we compared how visual artists and scientists interpret abstract visual-spatial representations, such as kinematics graphs, and visual-object representations, such as modern abstract art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (Eds), Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kosslyn SM, Koenig O (1992) Wet mind: the new cognitive neuroscience. Free, US

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farah MJ, Hammond KM, Levine DN, Calvanio R (1988) Visual and spatial mental imagery: dissociable systems of representations. Cognit Psychol 20:439–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kosslyn SM (1994) Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mazard A, Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Crivello F, Mazoyer B, Mellet E (2004) A PET meta-analysis of object and spatial mental imagery. Eur J of Cognit Psychol 16:673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisner EW (1985) The art of educational evaluation: a personal view. Falmer, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner H (1999) Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kassels S (1991) Transforming imagery into art: a study of the life and work of Georgia O’Keeffe. In Kunzendorf RG (ed), Mental imagery. Plenum, New York, pp 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller AI (1996) Insights of genius imagery and creativity in science and art. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Winner E, Pariser D (1985) Giftedness in the visual arts. Items 31:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M (2009) The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: theory and measurement. Appl Cognit Psychol 23:638–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozhevnikov M, Blazhenkova O, Becker M (2010) Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: restriction in the development of visual-processing resources. Psychon Bull Rev 17:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cognit 33:710–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aspinwall L, Shaw KL, Presmeg N (1997) Uncontrollable mental imagery: graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educational Stud Mathematics 33:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Twyman A, (1972) Imagery and mathematical activity. The psychology of mathematics education. Chelsea College, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brewer W, Schommer-Aikins M (2006) . Scientists are not deficient in mental imagery: galton revised. Rev Gen Psychol, 10:104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galton F (1880) Statistics of mental imagery. Mind 5:301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M, Mayer RE (2002) Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognit Instruct 20:47–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jonassen DH, Grabowski BL (1993) Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Erlbaum, England

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirby JR, Moore PJ, Schofield NJ (1988) Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educ Psychol 13:169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2003) The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mays N, Pope C (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J 320:50–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spradley JP (1994) The ethnographic interview. Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Helitzer-Allen D, Makhambera M, Wangel A (1994) Obtaining sensitive information: the need for more than focus groups. Reprod Health Matters 3:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley E (2005) Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. Family Health International and Jossey-Bas, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goering PN, Streiner DL (1996) Reconcilable differences: the marriage of qualitative and quantitative methods. Can J Psychiatry 41:491–497

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bauman LJ, Adair EG (1992) The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction. Health Educ Q 19:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sheon N, Crosby MG (2004) Ambivalent tales of HIV disclosure in San Francisco. Soc Sci Med 58:2105–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koester KA, Maiorana A, Vernon K et al. (2005) HIV surveillance in theory and practice: assessing the acceptability of California’s non-name HIV surveillance regulations. Health Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  31. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Kozhevnikov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kozhevnikov, M. (2015). Visual-Object Versus Visual-Spatial Representations: Insights from Studying Visualization in Artists and Scientists. In: Gero, J. (eds) Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9296-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9297-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics