Abstract
Collective biography writing (CBW) involves the co-construction of narratives of memory. The narrator tells a story which, at the prompting of the co-participants, is suffused with emotional and sensory details as it is re-written. CBW is fundamentally concerned with the social construction of the self, in turns, that enables the possibility of becoming critically aware of ourselves in order to question that which is taken for granted. It is particularly useful in opening up methodological and philosophical spaces in which to discuss questions of justice, equality and diversity in the contexts of education and learning. Focus of this chapter is the narrative Steering the Pilot Boat which illustrates the sort of data generated in CBW and acts as the focus of the interpretations discussed in this chapter. The narrative may be seen as emphasising the autonomy of the girl who is demonstrating what she has learned – here, how to steer the boat – the CBW process enables a poststructuralist interpretation that calls attention to the context-specific contingency of her learning. Steering the Pilot Boat is concerned with informal learning but the insights obtained through this narrative can usefully illuminate more formal teaching and learning situations. Working collectively with narratives can be a powerful tool in becoming aware of how knowledge is constructed, and it is a methodology that is therefore highly pertinent to education and educational research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barthes, R. (1977). Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes (trans: Howard, R.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Biesta, G. (2009). Deconstruction, justice, and the vocation of education. In M. A. Peters & G. Biesta (Eds.), Derrida, deconstruction, and the politics of pedagogy (pp. 15–38). New York: Peter Lang.
Butler, J. (1991). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism’. Praxis International, 11(2), 150–165.
Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993a). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993b). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing. New York: Alta Mira Press.
Davies, B. (2004). Introduction: Poststructuralist lines of flight in Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 3–9.
Davies, B. (2007). Judith Butler in conversation: Analyzing the texts and talk of everyday life. New York: Routledge.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2005). Feminist/poststructuralism. In C. Lewin & B. Somekh (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 318–325). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (Eds.). (2006a). Doing collective biography. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Open University Press.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006b). The practice of collective biography. In B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.), Doing collective biography (pp. 1–15). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education, Open University Press.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006c). A conversation about the struggles of collaborative writing. In B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.), Doing collective biography (pp. 114–144). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education, Open University Press.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006d). Constituting ‘the feminist subject’ in post-structuralist discourse. In: B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.), Doing collective biography (pp. 167–181). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education, Open University Press.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: Conversation and the production of selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.
Davies, B., Flemmen, A., Gannon, S., Laws, C., & Watson, B. (2002). Working on the ground: A collective biography of feminine subjectivities: Mapping the trace of power and knowledge. Social Semiotics, 12(3), 291–313.
Davies, B., Brown, J., Gannon, S., Hopkins, L., McCann, H., & Wihlborg, M. (2006). Constituting the feminist subject in poststructuralist discourse. Feminism and Psychology, 16(1), 87–103.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault (trans: Hand, S.). London: Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994 [1968]). Difference and repetition. New York: Colombia University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politic of culture. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing.
Derrida, J. (1978 [1966]). Writing and difference. (trans: Bass, A.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (1984). Deconstruction and the other: An interview with Jacques Derrida. In R. Kearney (Ed.), Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers (pp. 105–113). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Derrida, J. (1992). Force and law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice. New York: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (1997). The Villanova Roundtable: A conversation with Jacques Derrida. In J. D. Caputo (Ed.), Deconstruction in a nutshell. A conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.
Deutsch, F. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21(1), 106–125.
Foucault, M. (1980). Body/power’ and ‘truth and power’. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 55–62). Brighton: The Harvester Press. 109–133.
Foucault, M. (2000). So is it important to think? In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. III, pp. 454–458). New York: The New Press.
Gannon, S., & Davies, B. (2007). Postmodern, poststructural and critical perspectives. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 71–106). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., & Morton, M. (2001). Regimes of trustworthiness in qualitative research: The rigors of reciprocity. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(3), 323–345.
Haug, F., Andresen, S., Bünz-Elfferding, A., Hauser, K., Lang, U., Laudan, M., & Thomas, C. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. London: Verso Press.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1998 [1984]). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
Johnson, B. (1981). Translator’s introduction to J. Derrida, Dissemination. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1981). Women’s time. Signs, 7(1), 13–35.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
Peters, M., & Wain, K. (2003). Postmodernism/poststructuralism. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
St. Pierre, E. (1997). Methodology in the fold and in the irruption of transgressive data. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
St. Pierre, E., & Pillow, W. (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wihlborg, M. (2013). Using a process of collective biography: Writing in higher education to develop an ability to explore, reveal and critically reflect. European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 376–390.
Wolcott, H. (1990). On seeking – and rejecting – validity on qualitative research. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121–152). New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wihlborg, M. (2015). 1.8 An Awareness of the Feminist Subject: An Example of Collective Biography Writing in Poststructuralist Discourse Practice. In: Smeyers, P., Bridges, D., Burbules, N., Griffiths, M. (eds) International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9281-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9282-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)