• Janeen BaxterEmail author
  • Belinda Hewitt
  • Judy Rose


Along with most Western nations, Australia has witnessed a decline in marriage, an increase in divorce, and a growth in the number of couples choosing to cohabit prior to, or instead of, marriage. In the mid-1970s, just 16 % of couples lived together before marrying. Now, more than three-quarters of couples do so. Same-sex marriage is commonly debated, and most states in Australia recognize same-sex relationships as a legitimate form of intimate partnering. Marriage is no longer considered an essential foundation for raising children with growing numbers of people raising children outside marriage, either as single parents or in cohabiting relationships. Despite these substantial social shifts however, marriage remains an aspiration for many young Australians and most marry at some point in their lives. This chapter commences by describing trends in the marriage rate in Australia over several decades using data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, providing international comparisons where appropriate. We then review theoretical perspectives concerned with explaining change in marriage patterns and trends that provide insights into the reasons why most still aspire to marriage. Data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey are used to investigate who gets married in Australia, while in-depth interviews with men and women from a smaller study investigate the meaning of marriage in people’s lives. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of possible future developments and implications.


Marriage Rate Romantic Love Marriage Pattern Public Commitment Marriage Ceremony 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ABS. (2007). Marriage, Australia 2006 (Catalogue no. 3306.0.55.001). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. ABS. (2008). Australian historical population statistics, 2008 (Catalogue no. 3105.0.65.001). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. ABS. (2010). Marriages and divorces, Australia, 2010 (Catalogue no. 3310.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. ABS. (2011). Marriages and divorces, Australia, 2011 (Catalogue no. 3310.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. ABS. (2012a). Marriages and divorces, Australia, 2012 (Catalogue no. 3310.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. ABS. (2012b). Australian social trends (Catalogue no. 4102.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Reinventing the family: In search of new lifestyles. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brynin, M., & Ermisch, J. (2009). Introduction: The social significance of relationships. In M. Brynin & J. Ermisch (Eds.), Changing relationships. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Buchler, S., Baxter, J., Haynes, M., & Western, M. (2009). The social and demographic characteristics of cohabiters in Australia: Towards a typology of cohabiting couples. Family Matters, 82, 22–29.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalisation of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coontz, S. (2004). The world historical transformation of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 974–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Vaus, D. (2004). Diversity and change in Australian families: Statistical profiles. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  18. De Vaus, D., Qu, L., & Weston, R. (2003). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability. Family Matters, 65, 34–39.Google Scholar
  19. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eurostat European Union. (2012). Europe in figures, Eurostat year book, 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  21. Eurostat. (2013). Crude marriage rate European Union graph. Accessed 2 Dec 2013.
  22. Evans, A., & Baxter, J. (Eds.). (2013). Negotiating the life course. Stability and change in life pathways. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heard, G. (2012, June 26). Australian census: For better or worse, marriage persists. The Conversation. Accessed 15 May 2014.
  26. Heaton, T. B., & Blake, A. M. (1999). Gender differences in determinants of marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hewitt, B., & Baxter, J. (2011). Who gets married in Australia? The characteristics associated with a transition into first marriage, 2001–6. Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horwitz, A. V., & White, H. R. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(2), 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note. Journal of Family Issues, 23(8), 1065–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 9, 2010.Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (2009). Marriage and divorce. In OECD, Society at a glance 2009: OECD social indicators. OECD Publishing. Accessed 16 May 2014.
  33. OECD. (2012). OECD family database. Accessed 22 Sept 2013.
  34. Qu, L., & Soriano, G. (2004). Forming couple relationships: Adolescents’ aspirations and young adults’ actualities. Family Matters, 68, 43–49.Google Scholar
  35. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soons, J. P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soons, J. P., Liefbroer, A. C., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1254–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. StataCorp. (2008). Stata statistical software, release 10.0. College Station: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations Statistical Division. (2011). Demographic yearbook 2011. Retrieved from
  41. Waite, L. J., & Lehrer, E. L. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 29, 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social Science ResearchUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Social Science and Institute for Social Science ResearchUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations