Advertisement

Sexless Marriages in Japan: Prevalence and Reasons

  • Yoshie MorikiEmail author
  • Kenji Hayashi
  • Rikiya Matsukura
Chapter
Part of the International Studies in Population book series (ISIP, volume 11)

Abstract

Using data from a national survey on work and family life in Japan, this chapter examines the frequency of sexual intercourse between married or cohabitating partners. The data show that the frequency of intercourse in Japan is low: slightly less than half (45 %) of the couples reported not having had sexual intercourse for at least 1 month. A logit regression analysis suggests that husbands’ long working hours, the presence of children under age 3, and poor marital relations were major determinants of sexless marriages. In addition, qualitative data from focus-group discussions indicate that “having sex” is a less important activity to Japanese couples in their busy daily schedules than are childrearing tasks or work responsibilities. The respondents were not particularly bothered by their sexless status within marriage as long as the marital partnership worked well in the context of a child-centered family.

Keywords

Sexual Intercourse Marital Quality Unprotected Intercourse Sexual Frequency Marital Duration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant to the Nihon University Population Research Institute from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, 2006–2010, in the form of a matching-fund subsidy from the Academic Frontier Project for Private Universities.

References

  1. Abe, T. (2004). Sekkusuresu no seishin igaku (The psychiatry of sexlessness). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
  2. Atoh, M. (2000). Gendai jinkogaku (Modern demography). Tokyo: Nippon-Hyoron-sha.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bongaarts, J., & Potter, R. G. (1983). Fertility, biology, and behavior: An Analysis of the proximate determinants. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Brewis, A., & Meyer, M. (2005). Marital coitus across the life course. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37(4), 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caudill, W., & Plath, D. W. (1974). Who sleeps by whom? Parent–child involvement in urban Japanese families. In T. S. Lebra & W. P. Lebra (Eds.), Japanese culture and behavior: Selected readings (pp. 277–312). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, S. (1981). The cultural context of condom use in Japan. Studies in Family Planning, 12(1), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durex Global Sex Survey. (2005). Give and receive: 2005 Global Sex Survey results, frequency of sex. http://www.durex.com/en-JP/SexualWellbeingSurvey/Documents/gss2005result.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2011.
  9. Edwards, J. N., & Booth, A. (1976). Sexual behavior in and out of marriage: An assessment of correlates. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genda, Y., & Kawakami, A. (2006). Shugyo nikyokuka to sei-kodo (Divided employment and sexual behavior). Nihon Rodo Kenkyu Zasshi (The Japanese Journal of Labor Studies), 556, 80–91.Google Scholar
  11. Genda, Y., & Saito, J. (2007). Shigoto to sekkusu no aida (Between work and sex). Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Greenblat, C. S. (1983). The salience of sexuality in the early years of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(2), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. James, W. H. (1974). Marital coital rates, spouses’ ages, family size and social class. The Journal of Sex Research, 10(3), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. James, W. H. (1983). Decline in coital rates with spouses’ ages and duration of marriage. Journal of Biosocial Science, 15(1), 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Japan Family Planning Association (2008). Danjo no seikatsu to ishiki nikansuru chosa hokokusho (The 4th survey on life and attitudes of men and women: Report). Tokyo: Japan Family Planning Association.Google Scholar
  16. Japan, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2007). Heisei 17 nen jinko-dotai-tokei (Vital statistics of Japan 2005) (Vol. 1). Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association.Google Scholar
  17. Japan, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2008). Rodo jikan tou minaoshi gaidorain (Guidelines for reviewing labor time). http://www.mhlw.go.jp/general/seido/roudou/jikan/dl/honbun.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2011.
  18. Japan, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Statistics Bureau. (2007). 2006 Rodoryoku chosa nempo (Annual report on the Labour Force Survey 2006). Tokyo: Japan Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  19. Japan, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Statistics Bureau. (2008). Heisei-17-nen kokusei chosa, Jinko gaikan shirizu No.5 (2005 population census of Japan, Population overview series No. 5). Tokyo: Japan Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  20. Kaneko, R. (2009). Shorai jinko suikei ni okeru shussho katei settei no wakugumi ni tsuite (On the methodological framework for making fertility assumptions in the population projections for Japan). Jinko Mondai Kenkyu (Journal of Population Problems), 65(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
  21. Kaneko, R., Sasai, T., Kamano, S., Iwasawa, M., Mita, F., & Moriizumi, R. (2008). Marriage process and fertility of Japanese married couples: Overview of the results of the Thirteenth Japanese National Fertility Survey, married couples. The Japanese Journal of Population, 6(1), 24–50.Google Scholar
  22. Kitamura, K. (2009). Yunikuna shoshika taisaku heno teian: Kiwado wa danjo-kan no komyunikeshon-sukiru no kojo (A proposal for a unique method for dealing with low fertility: Improvement of communication skill between the sexes as the key word). Koshu eisei (The Journal of Public Health Practice), 73(8), 581–586.Google Scholar
  23. Levinger, G. (1966). Systematic distortion in spouses’ reports of preferred and actual sexual behavior. Sociometry, 29(3), 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogura, K. (2006). Contemporary working time in Japan: Legal system and reality. Japan Labor Review, 3(3), 5–22.Google Scholar
  25. Rao, K. V., & Demaris, A. (1995). Coital frequency among married and cohabiting couples in the United States. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rustein, S. O., & Shah, I. (2004). DHS infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries (Comparative Reports, No. 9). Calverton: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  27. Sato, R. (2008). Nihon no “cho-shoshika”: Sono genin to seisaku taio wo megutte (Very low fertility in Japan: Its causes and policy responses). Jinko Mondai Kenkyu (Journal of Population Problems), 64(2), 10–24.Google Scholar
  28. Small, M. F. (1999). Our babies, ourselves: How biology and culture shape the way we parent. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  29. The Nikkei. (2006, 15 October). Koyo ruru kaikaku (Revisions of employment rules).Google Scholar
  30. The Nikkei. (2010, 17 March). Funin chiryo kakei ni zushiri (Infertility treatment: A heavy burden for the family budget).Google Scholar
  31. Udry, J. R. (1980). Changes in the frequency of marital intercourse from panel data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9(4), 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Udry, J. R., & Morris, N. M. (1978). Relative contribution of male and female age to the frequency of marital intercourse. Social Biology, 25(2), 128–134.Google Scholar
  33. Udry, J. R., Deven, F. R., & Coleman, S. J. (1982). A cross-national comparison of the relative influence of male and female age on the frequency of marital intercourse. Journal of Biosocial Science, 14(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood, J. W. (1994). Dynamics of human reproduction. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Yamada, M. (2007). Shoshi shakai Nihon: Mo hitotsu no kakusa no yukue (Japan as a low-fertility society: The future outlook of yet another discrepancy). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshie Moriki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kenji Hayashi
    • 2
  • Rikiya Matsukura
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Liberal ArtsInternational Christian UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Public HealthSaitamaJapan
  3. 3.Population Research InstituteNihon UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations