Global Economic Accounting and Its Critics: Objective Approaches (1)

  • Jürgen FaikEmail author
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)


The article describes and evaluates the internationally harmonized System of National Accounting which primarily refers to flow-related, monetarily assessed variables measured within a specified time period (typically one year or a year’s quarter). It becomes obvious that the calculated aggregated incomes are valuable for comparing regions with each other or for comparing different regions over time regarding their material living standards. However, the results of those accounting systems (e.g. the calculation of aggregate incomes like the Gross Domestic Product or the Gross National Income) have a number of deficiencies so that they should be considered with caution as measures of wellbeing. Moreover, the performance of the System of National Accounting faces some challenges generated by the economic process of globalization, especially mediated via the transmission channel of “multinational enterprises”.


Balance of payments Consumption Economic cycle Globalization Gross domestic product Gross national income Input-output systems National accounting Wealth 


  1. Atkinson, A. B. (1983). The economics of inequality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  2. Braakmann, A. (2010). Zur Wachstums- und Wohlfahrtsmessung. Die Vorschläge der Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Kommission und der Initiative “BIP und mehr” (To growth and wellbeing measurement. The proposals of the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission and of the initiative ‘Beyond GDP’). Wirtschaft und Statistik, 62(7), 609–614.Google Scholar
  3. Brümmerhoff, D. (2002): Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen (National accounts) (7th ed.). Munich & Vienna: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS, United States Department of Labor). (2012). International comparisons of GDP per capita and per hour, 1960–2011. Washington, DC: BLS. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  5. Charmes, J. (2006). Measurement of the contribution of informal sector/informal employment to GDP in developing countries: Some conceptual and methodological issues. Expert Group on Informal Sector Statistics (Delhi Group), 11th & 12th May 2006, New Delhi, India (Agenda Item 3: Measuring contribution of informal sector/informal employment to GDP; mimeo).Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities. (2009). GDP and beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  7. Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  8. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eurostat. (2010). Feasibility study for wellbeing indicators. Task 4: Critical review. Brussels: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  10. Faik, J. (2010). Grundlagen der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Eine Einführung in die Volkswirtschaftslehre für ökonomisch Interessierte (Basics of economics. An introduction to economics for persons interested in this subject) (3rd ed.). Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
  11. García Díez, S. (2012, 29 May–1 June): Wellbeing indicators. Questions of quality. The perspective of official statistics. Paper to be presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Q2012, Athens (mimeo).Google Scholar
  12. Horwich, G. (2000). Economic lessons of the Kobe earthquake. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nordhaus, W. D., & Tobin, J. (1973). Is growth obsolete? In M. Moss (Ed.), The measurement of economic and social performance (pp. 509–532). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  14. Office for National Statistics (UK Centre for the Measurement of Government Activity). (2008). Proposals for satellite accounts. London: Office for National Statistics. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  15. Oltmanns, E., Braakmann, A., & Schmidt, J. (2012, August 5–11). Measuring the quality of life: empirical evidence for Germany. Paper prepared for the 32th general conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Boston (mimeo). Accessed 30 June 2013.
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Measuring the un-observed economy. A handbook. Paris: OECD. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Society at a glance 2011. OECD social indicators. Paris: OECD. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013a). OECD economic outlook. Paris: OECD. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013b). National accounts at a glance 2013. Paris: OECD. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  21. Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2009). New estimates of the index of economic wellbeing for selected OECD countries, 1980–2007. Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards Research.Google Scholar
  22. Pfaff, T., & Harata, J. (2013): Testing the Easterlin hypothesis with panel data: The dynamic relationship between life satisfaction and economic growth in Germany and in the UK (SOEP Papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, #554). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (“German Institute for Economic Research”).Google Scholar
  23. Pigou, A. C. (1920). Economics of welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  24. Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1995). Economics (15th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Schenau, S. (2009). The Dutch environmental accounts: Present status and future developments. The Hague: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (“Statistics Netherlands”; mimeo). Accessed 30 June 2013.
  26. Schneider, F., & Enste, D. (2000). Shadow economies around the world: Size, causes, and consequences (IMF Working Paper WP/00/26). Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  27. Sharpe, A., et al. (2011). The Levy Institute measure of economic wellbeing: Estimates for Canada, 1999 and 2005 (Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, 680), New York: Levy Economics Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Speich, D. (2011). The use of global abstractions: National income accounting in the period of imperial decline. Journal of Global History, 6(1), 7–28. doi: 10.1017/S1740022811000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, Paris: The Commission. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  30. Stockhammer, E. (2013). Why have wage shares fallen? A panel analysis of the determinants of functional income distribution. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations (UN, Department of Economic and Social Development, Statistical Division). (2000). Handbook of national accounting: Integrated environmental and economic accounting. An operational manual. New York: UN. . Accessed 30 June 2013.
  32. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN). (2011). The impact of globalization on National Accounts. New York/Geneva: UN. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  33. United Nations (UN). (2013). Accessed 30 June 2013.
  34. Wolff, E. N. et al. (2011). A comparison of inequality and living standards in Canada and the United States using an expanded measure of economic well-being (Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, 703). New York: Levy Economics Institute.Google Scholar
  35. World Bank. (2013). 2013/world development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank (ebook). Accessed 30 June 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FaSoFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations