Advertisement

Sand Mining pp 125-138 | Cite as

Mining Strategies and Management

  • D. Padmalal
  • K. Maya
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The exponential rise in the demand for construction grade sand resulted from economic growth and the liberal development policies over the years have aggravated indiscriminate scooping of sand and gravel from river beds and floodplains of most rivers in the world. The situation warrants scientific interventions for judicious management of the river bed resources by striking a balance between its demand for development and the environmental concerns. The present chapter reviews the existing regulatory procedures, and also environmental laws/policies that are in practice in different parts of the world. A set of guidelines have been put forth to update the existing sand and gravel extraction policies in India and elsewhere for achieving the goal of sustainability in the case of sand resource extraction and managements.

Keywords

Mining strategies Environmental laws of sand mining Sediment budgeting Redline concept 

References

  1. Andrews ED, Nankervis JM (1995) Effective discharge and the design of channel maintenance flows for gravel-bed rivers. In: Natural and anthropogenic influence in fluvial geomorphology, geophysical monograph, vol 89. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 151–164Google Scholar
  2. Cairns J Jr (1988) Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 405Google Scholar
  3. DID (2009) River sand mining and management guideline. Department of Irrigation, Malaysia, p 50Google Scholar
  4. Emmett WW (1999) Quantification of channel-maintenance flows for gravel-bed rivers. In: Wildland Hydrology, vol 99. American Water Resources Association, Herndon, pp 77–84Google Scholar
  5. Florsheim J, Goodwin P, Marcus L (1998) Geomorphic effects of gravel extraction in the Russian River, California. In: Bobrowsky PT (ed) Aggregate resources: a global perspective. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp 87–99Google Scholar
  6. Frissell CA, Nawa RK (1992) Incidence and causes of physical failures of artificial habitat structures in streams of western Oregon and Washington. North Am J Fish Manag 12:182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Global Construction Perspectives (2012) www.globalconstruction2020.com. Accessed 13 Dec 2012
  8. Graf WL (1979) Catastrophe by theory as a model for change fluvial systems. In: Rhodes DD, Williams GP (eds) Adjustments in the fluvial system. Dubuque Kendall/Hunt Publishers, Dubugue, Iowa, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  9. Iversen TM, Kronvang B, Madsen BL, Markmann P, Nielsen MB (1993) Re-establishment of Danish streams: restoration and maintenance measures. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosystems 3:73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knighton D (1984) Fluvial forms and processes. Edward Arnold/Hodder and Stoughton, London, p 320Google Scholar
  11. Kondolf GM (1994) Environmental planning in the regulation and management of instream gravel mining in California. Landscape Urban Plann 29:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kondolf GM, Smeltzer M, Kimball L (2002) Freshwater gravel mining and dredging issues. Report prepared for Washington department of fish and wildlife, Washington department of ecology and Washington department of transportation, 122 Google Scholar
  13. Kondolf GM, Vick JC, Ramirez TM (1996) Salmon spawning habitat rehabilitation on the Merced river, California: an evaluation of project planning and performance. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1964) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. WH Freeman, San Francisco, p 522Google Scholar
  15. Maya K, Padmalal D, Babu KN (2012) Environmental degradation of Muvattupuzha river basin-causes, consequences and strategies for river restoration. Technical Report, Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvanathapuram, Kerala, p 110Google Scholar
  16. Mossa J, McLean M (1997) Channel planform and land cover changes on a mined river floodplain—Amite River, Louisiana, USA. Appl Geogr 17:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nash DB (1994) Effective sediment-transporting discharge from magnitude-frequency analysis. J Geol 102:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Environmental Policy (2003) Draft National Environmental Policy request for public views and comments. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Sri Lanka, p 13Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council (NRC) (1983) An evaluation of flood-level prediction using alluvial river models. Committee on Hydrodynamic Computer Models for Flood Insurance Studies, Advisory Board on the Built Environment, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. National Research Council (NRC) (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology and public policy. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC, p 62Google Scholar
  21. Paukert C, Schloesser J, Fischer J, Eitzmann J (2008) Effect of instream sand dredging on fish communities in the Kansas river, USA: current and historical perspectives. J Freshw Ecology 23:623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramachandran KK, Padmalal D (1997) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of mineral based industries. In: Nair, Nair (eds) Natural Resources of Kerala, Balachandran Thampi, WWF for Nature, Thiruvananthapuram, pp 31–49Google Scholar
  23. Rampel LL, Church M (2009) Physical and ecological response to disturbance by gravel mining in a large alluvial river. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:52–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt LJ, Potyondy JP (2001) Flow regimes needed to maintain channels in gravel-bed rivers. In: Proceedings of the 7th Federal interagency sedimentation conference, Reno, Nevada, vol 1, pp 66–69Google Scholar
  25. Sear DA (1994) River restoration and geomorphology. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosystems 4:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sreebha S (2008) Environmental impact of sand mining: a case study in the river catchments of Vembanad lake, Southwest India. PhD Thesis (unpublished), Cochin University of Science and Technology, KochiGoogle Scholar
  27. Sreebha S, Padmalal D (2011) Environmental impact assessment of sand mining from the small catchment river in the southwestern coast of India. Environ Manage 47:130–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolman MG, Miller JP (1960) Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. J Geol 68:54–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Earth Science StudiesThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations