Advertisement

A Mentorship Framework for WIL in Software Development

Conference paper

Abstract

The major difficulty faced by potential graduates in the software development diploma in South African universities of technology is lack of placement for work integrated learning. Most companies do not have anyone with time to properly mentor a potential graduate. The student challenge is transition from the academic environment to the workplace without graduate attributes, such as employability skills, kaizen theory and productivity theory. The universities on their own cannot prepare a student for the real world of work without engaging external industry partners. The research study provides a mentorship framework to operationalize simulated work integrated learning to incorporate concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization and active experimentation in writing applications according to industry outcomes. The research results present a case study of the Tshwane University of Technology in the implementation of the mentorship framework for simulated work integrated learning.

Keywords

Attributes Economy Learning Mentorship Simulation Technology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Betts, M. Lewis, A. Dressler, L. Svensson, Optimizing learning simulation to support a quinary career development model. Asia Pac. J. Coop. Educ. 10(2), 99–119 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Goold, N. Augar, Using virtual meeting spaces for work integrated learning, in Proceedings Ascilite Auckland (2009), pp. 367–371Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Orrell, Work-integrated learning programmes: management and educational quality Janice Orrell*, in Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality forum (2004), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.C. Daniels, Skills Shortages in South Africa: A Literature Review (Development Policy Research Unit, Cape Town, 2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Mclennan, S. Keating, ALTC NAGCAS national symposium work-integrated learning (WIL), in Australian Universities: The Challenges of Mainstreaming WIL (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Patel, Nationals Skills Accord, Pretoria (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. James, Seven tips on mentoring entry-level developers, techrepublic (2014). Available http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/software-engineer/seven-tips-on-mentoring/. Accessed 1 Mar 2014
  8. 8.
    M.A. Omazic, D. Bla ekovic, Z. Baracskai, Virtual mentorship program: a development of young professionals and scientists, in 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society (2008), pp. 331–336Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.L. Hazen and S.T. Freua, An integrate Embedded Software Engineering Program and Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE (1997), pp. 862–866Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CHE, Work-Integrated Learning: Good Practice Guide, Pretoria (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Vo-Tran, S. Pittayachawan, S. Reynolds, Learning and Teaching Investment Fund 2010, academia.edu (2010), pp. 1–32Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Lateef, Simulation-based learning: just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock 3(4), 348–352 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Patrick, C-j. Peach, D. Pocknee, C. Webb, F. Fletcher, M. Pretto, A National Scoping Study. Queensland University of Technology: The WIL [Work Integrated Learning] report: a national scoping study [Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) Final report], Brisbane, p. 111 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Abeysekera, Issues relating to designing a work-integrated learning program in an undergraduate accounting degree program and its implications for the curriculum. Asia Pac. J. Coop. Educ. 7(1), 7–15 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Regev, D.C. Gause, A. Wegmann, Experiential learning approach for requirements engineering education. Requirements Eng. 14(4), 269–287 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Choy, B. Delahaye, Partnerships between universities and workplaces: some challenges for work-integrated learning. Stud. Continuing Educ. 33(2), 157–172 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Gibbons, M. Gray, An integrated and experience-based approach to social work education: the Newcastle model. Soc. Work Educ. 21(5), 529–549 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Ferns, K. Moore, Assessing student outcomes in fieldwork placements: an overview of current practice. Asia Pac. J. Coop. Educ. 13(4), 207–224 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Ishisaka, S. Sohng, Teaching notes: partnership for integrated community-based learning: a social work community—campus collaboration. J. Soc. Work Educ. 40(2), 321–337 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.A. Masethe, H.D. Masethe, Mentorship model for simulated work integrated learning using windows phone, in Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2013, WCECS 2013, San Francisco, USA, 23–25 Oct 2013, pp. 212–215Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software EngineeringTshwane University of Technology eMalahleni CampuseMalahleniSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Software EngineeringTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations