Abstract
Science olympiads are important vehicles for science communication, especially between scientists, educators, and students. When students participate in these olympiads, they gain exposure to a different view of science from that which they experience at the high school level. Close contact with university faculty and science researchers will provide students with a glimpse of what careers in science can offer. For those who will not pursue science any further than high school, at least they will hopefully have a higher level of scientific literacy.
There is scant literature on the science olympiads, especially on best practices from countries which have consistently done well in these competitions. Aiming to address this issue, our chapter focuses on the Singapore experience. There are multiple factors that contribute to Singapore’s sustained success in these competitions over three decades. These include (1) a strong culture in science and mathematics learning in schools and universities coupled with ample career opportunities in science and technology, (2) the internationally competitive science and mathematics curricula in Singapore schools, (3) the strong support from Singapore’s education authority for students to be exposed to such competitions, (4) the involvement of dedicated university academics and teachers in mentoring students, and (5) the partnership of scientific societies in the natural sciences in organizing subject-based national olympiads to identify top talents for further grooming and the rigorous enrichment programs. Students could also be motivated by the honor of winning a gold medal which potentially enhances their chances of gaining admission into a number of top universities (inclusive of the two premier local universities), especially when only few foreigners are admitted annually.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abernathy, T. V., & Vineyard, R. N. (2001). Academic competitions in science: What are the rewards for students? The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(5), 269–276.
Baird, W. E., Shaw, E. L., & McLarty, P. (1996). Predicting success in selected events of the science Olympiad. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 85–93.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.
Covington, M. V., & Teel, K. M. (1996). Overcoming student failure: Changing motives and incentives for learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89, 744–778.
Jones, G. (1991). Gender differences in science competitions. Science Education, 75, 159–167.
Lim, S. S. L., & Lim, T. M. (2004, December 7–10). The route to the International Biology Olympiads – The Singapore approach. Presented at the Biology in Asia Conference 2004, Singapore.
McKinsey Report (2007, September). How the world’s best-performing school systems came out on top. Retrieved January 30, 2013, from http://www.mckinsey.com/App_Media/Reports/SSO/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf
O’Kennedy, R., Burke, M., van Kampen, P., James, P., Cotter, M., Browne, W. R., et al. (2005). The first EU Science Olympiad (EUSO): A model for science education. Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 58–62.
Oliver, M., & Venville, G. (2011). An exploratory case study of Olympiad students’ attitudes towards and passion for science. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2295–2322.
van Kampen, P., Browne, W. R., Burke, M., Cotter, M. A., James, P., McGlynn, E., et al. (2004). A new science competition for secondary school students: The first European Union Science Olympiad. European Journal of Physics, 25, 23.
Wetmore, D. E. (1978). Student recruitment through a science Olympiad. Journal of Chemical Education, 55(1), 43.
Wilson, J. D. (1981). The science Olympiad: Promoting interest in science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 10(3), 171–174.
Acknowledgments
This chapter has benefitted greatly from the constructive comments on earlier drafts from Poon Chew Leng, Tan Aik Ling, Lee Yew Jin, and Tan Hong Kim. Kwek Leong Chuan is acknowledged for providing updated information on former physics olympians.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, S.S.L., Cheah, HM., Hor, T.S.A. (2014). Science Olympiads as Vehicles for Identifying Talent in the Sciences: The Singapore Experience. In: Tan Wee Hin, L., Subramaniam, R. (eds) Communicating Science to the Public. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9097-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9097-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9096-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9097-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)