Advertisement

The Social Context of Middle School: Teachers, Friends, and Activities in Montessori and Traditional School Environments

  • Kevin Rathunde
  • Mihaly CsikszentmihalyiEmail author

Abstract

This study compared the time use and perceptions of schools, teachers, and friends of approximately 290 demographically matched students in Montessori and traditional middle schools. We used the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) and questionnaires and conducted multivariate analyses showing that the Montessori students (a) reported more positive perceptions of their school environment and their teachers, and (b) more often perceived their classmates as friends while at school. ESM time estimates suggested that the 2 school environments were also organized in different ways: Montessori students spent more time engaged with school-related tasks, chores, collaborative work, and individual projects; traditional students spent more time in social and leisure activities and more time in didactic educational settings (e.g., listening to a lecture, note taking, watching instructional videos). These results are discussed in terms of current thought on motivation in education and middle school reform.

Keywords

Middle School Parental Education Intrinsic Motivation School Context Eighth Grade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1984). Systems of student and teacher motivation: Toward a qualitative definition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderman, E., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderman, E., Maehr, M., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32(3), 131–147.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. J. (1990). Curriculum and instruction in middle-grade schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(6), 450–457.Google Scholar
  6. Berndt, T., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312–1329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. (1997). Transforming schools in communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52, 399–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corp.Google Scholar
  11. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1995). Great transitions: Preparing adolescents for a new century. New York: Carnegie Corp.Google Scholar
  12. Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1997). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  18. Deci, E. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination-theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, A. Krapp, & S. Hidi (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: PerigeeGoogle Scholar
  21. Dimant, R., & Bearison, D. (1991). Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 27, 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eccles, J., Lord, S., & Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experience in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.) & W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  25. Feldlaufer, H., Midgley, C., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Student, teacher, and observer perceptions of the classroom environment before and after the transition to junior high school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Felner, R., Jackson, A., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points-based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 428–432.Google Scholar
  27. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  28. Fraser, B., & Fisher, D. (1982). Predicting students’ outcomes from their perception of classroom psychosocial environment. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, J., McPhail, J., & Berndt, J. (2002). Sixth graders’ views of activities that do and do not help them learn. Elementary School Journal, 102, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gentry, M., Gable, R., & Rizza, M. (2002). Students’ perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grolnick, W., & Ryan, R. (1987). Autonomy support in education: Creating the facilitating environment. In N. Hastings & J. Schwieso (Eds.), New directions in educational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 213–231)., Behavior and motivation London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  34. Guthrie, J., & Davis, M. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A lifespan perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligan (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Harter, S. (1996). Teacher and classmate influences on scholastic motivation, self-esteem, and level of voice in adolescents. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 11–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harter, S., Whitesell, N., & Kowalski, P. (1992b). Individual differences in the effects of educational transitions on young adolescents’ perceptions of competence and motivational orientation. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 777–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hickey, D. (1997). Motivation and contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 32, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hicks, L. (1997). How do academic motivation and peer relationships mix in an adolescent’s world? Middle School Journal, 28, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Juvonen, J., & Wentzel, K. (Eds.). (1996). Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66, 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lipsitz, J., Jackson, A., & Austin, L. (1997). What works in middle-grades school reform? Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 517–556.Google Scholar
  45. Mac Iver, D., Young, E., & Washburn, B. (2002). Instructional practices and motivation during middle school (with special attention to science). In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 333–351). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maehr, M., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maehr, M., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  48. Magnusson, D., & Statin, H. (1998). Person-context interaction theories. In R. Lerner (Ed.) & W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 685–740). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  49. Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1996). Listening in classrooms. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  51. Midgely, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Montessori, M. (1946). Unpublished lectures. London: AMI.Google Scholar
  53. Montessori, M. (1965). Spontaneous activity in education. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  54. Montessori, M. (1976). From childhood to adolescence (2nd ed.). New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  55. Montessori, M. (1981). The secret of childhood. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  56. National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). National education longitudinal study of 1988: Second follow-up: Student component data file user’s manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  57. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). NELS: 88 Survey Item Evaluation Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  58. Nichols, J., & Miller, R. (1994). Cooperative learning and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2002). Motivation in education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Rathunde, K. (2001). Montessori education and optimal experience: A framework for new research. NAMTA, 26, 11–43.Google Scholar
  62. Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (in press). The developing person: An experiential perspective. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.) & W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed.). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryan, A. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryan, A. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72, 1135–1150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryan, A., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Santrock, J. (1999). Life-span development (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  68. Savin-Williams, R., & Berndt, T. (1990). Friendship and peer relations. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 277–307). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  71. Singer, J., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., & Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Standing, E. M. (1984). Maria Montessori: Her life and work. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  74. Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescents. Child Development, 57, 841–851.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  77. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1991). Preparing young children for success: Guideposts for achieving our first national goal, an America 2000 education strategy. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  78. Watson, K. (Ed.). (2001). Doing comparative education research: Issues and problems. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  79. Wentzel, K. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wentzel, K. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D. A., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Paychology, 27, 552–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations