Advertisement

Design and Implementation of Markets for Groundwater Pumping Rights

  • Nicholas Brozović
  • Richael Young
Chapter
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 11)

Abstract

Groundwater is an important resource for agricultural and urban water users. In a number of regions around the world, there is rapid change in water management institutions as a result of the impacts of groundwater use on neighboring wells, streams, and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Increasingly, regulations are based on quantification, monitoring, and enforcement of irrigation rights. Under these conditions, allowing water users to trade pumping rights is a cost-effective mechanism to reduce the costs of regulations on water users. Indeed, despite high transaction costs, nascent markets for tradable groundwater pumping rights have emerged. This chapter describes the history, current institutional context, and economic framework of markets for groundwater pumping rights. In particular, we compare key differences in design and management between groundwater pumping rights markets and surface water markets. We provide a case study that compares groundwater trading to alternate water allocation systems in the Republican River Basin in the United States, an area with active interstate water conflict.

Keywords

Tradable permits Environmental management Monitoring Enforcement Transboundary conflicts Spatial externalities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. EAR-0709735, by USDA grant No. AG 2012-67003-19981, and by USDA-NIFA Hatch project number #ILLU-470-369

References

  1. Athanassoglou S, Sheriff G, Siegfried T, Huh WT (2012) Optimal mechanisms for heterogeneous multi-cell aquifers. Environ Resour Econ 52:265–291. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9528-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barfield DW (2013) Kansas Department of Agriculture, Division of Water Resources, Topeka, KansasGoogle Scholar
  3. Brozović N, Sunding DL, Zilberman D (2010) On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality. Resour Energy Econ. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010
  4. Carlson GA, Zilberman D, Miranowski JA (eds) (1993) Agricultural and environmental resource economics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chong H, Sunding DL (2006) Water markets and trading. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31(2):239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domenico PA (1972) Concepts and models in groundwater hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Easter KW, Liu Y (2007) Who pays for irrigation: cost recovery and water pricing? Water Policy 9:285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards Aquifer Authority (2012) Edwards Aquifer Authority rules. http://www.edwardsaquifer.org/files/download/2b4674cbea20e5b
  9. English M (1990) Deficit irrigation I: analytical framework. J Irrig Drain Eng 116(3):399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeze A, Cherry J (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  11. GHD, Hamstead Consulting, O’Keefe V (2011) A framework for managing and developing groundwater trading, waterlines report, National Water Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. Glover R, Balmer G (1954) River depletion resulting from pumping a well near a river. Am Geophys Union Trans 35(3):468–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han J (2011) Spatial dynamic groundwater regulation to ensure adequate instream flow for Salmon. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Illinois, Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunt B (1999) Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping. Ground Water 37(1):98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt B (2012) Review of stream depletion solutions, behavior, and calculations. J Hydrol Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000768
  16. Jaeger WK (2004) Conflicts over water in the Upper Klamath Basin and the potential role for market-based allocations. J Agric Resour Econ 29:167–184Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins CT (1968) Techniques for computing rate and volume of stream depletion by wells. Ground Water 6:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuwayama Y, Brozović N (2013) The regulation of a spatially heterogeneous externality: tradable groundwater permits to protect instream flows. J Environ Econ Manage. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.02.004
  19. Martin D, Supalla R, McMullen B, Nedved S (2007) Water optimizer: a decision support tool for producers with limited water. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Departments of Biological Systems Engineering and Agricultural Economics, Lincoln, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  20. McKusick V (2002) State of Kansas v. state of Nebraska and state of Colorado: joint motion of the states for entry of proposed consent judgement and approval and adoption of final settlement stipulation, Supreme Court of the United States, 2002Google Scholar
  21. Meinzen-Dick R (1994) Private tubewell development and groundwater markets in Pakistan: a district-level analysis. Pakistan Dev Rev 33(4):857–869Google Scholar
  22. Montgomery D (1972) Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J Econ Theory 5(3):395–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (2004) COHYST technical committee. The 40-year, 28-percent stream depletion lines for the COHYST area west of Elm Creek. Nebraska, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  24. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (2007) 2008 annual evaluation of availability of hydrologically connected water supplies, Lincoln, NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  25. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, Middle Republican Natural Resources District (2010) Integrated management plan, Middle Republican Natural Resources District, Curtis, Nebraska, p 28Google Scholar
  26. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, Tri-Basin Natural Resources District (2012) Integrated management plan, Tri-Basin Natural Resources District, Holdrege, Nebraska, p 30Google Scholar
  27. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, Upper Republican Natural Resources District (2010) Integrated management plan, Upper Republican Natural Resources District, Imperial, Nebraska, p 24Google Scholar
  28. Palazzo A, Brozović N (2014) The role of groundwater trading in spatial water management. Agric Water Manage. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.004 Google Scholar
  29. Qureshi ME, Reeson A, Reinelt P, Brozović N, Whitten S (2012) Factors determining the economic value of groundwater. Hydrogeol J 20(5):821–829. doi: 10.1007/s10040-012-0867-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. S. S. Papadopulos and Associates, Inc., Colorado Geological Survey (2007) Coalbed methane stream depletion assessment study – Raton Basin. Colorado Geological Survey, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  31. Saak A, Peterson J (2007) Groundwater use under incomplete information. J Environ Econ Manage 54(2):214–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saleth RM (1994) Groundwater markets in India: a legal and institutional perspective. Indian Econ Rev 29(2):157–176Google Scholar
  33. Saliba BC (1987) Do water markets “work”? Market transfers and trade-offs in the southwestern states. Water Resour Res 23:1113–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saliba BC, Bush DB (1987) Water markets in theory and practice: market transfers, water values, and public policy. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  35. Shah T (1993) Groundwater markets and irrigation development: political economy and practical policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Skurray JH, Pandit R, Pannell DJ (2012) Institutional impediments to groundwater trading: the case of the Gnangara groundwater system of Western Australia. J Environ Plan Manage. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.716368
  37. Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10:52–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sunding DL, Zilberman D, Howitt R, Dinar A, MacDougall N (2002) Measuring the costs of reallocating water from agriculture: a multi-model approach. Nat Resour Model 15(2):201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson CL, Supalla RJ, Martin DL, McMullen BP (2009) Evidence supporting cap and trade as a groundwater policy option for reducing irrigation consumptive use. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45:1508–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wallace R, Darama Y, Annable M (1990) Stream depletion by cyclic pumping of wells. Water Resour Res 26(6):1263–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Webber M, Barnett J, Finlayson B, Wang M (2008) Pricing China’s irrigation water. Global Environ Change 18(4):617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Western Governors’ Association (2012) Water transfers in the west, The Western Governors’ Association, Denver, Colorado, 80202Google Scholar
  43. Young RA (1986) Why are there so few transactions among water users? Am J Agric Resour Econ 68:1143–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang L, Wang J, Huang J, Rozelle S (2008) Development of groundwater markets in China: a glimpse into progress to date. World Dev 36(4):706–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations