Impact of Oyster Farming on Rural Community Sustainability in North Vietnam

  • Janine PierceEmail author
  • Wayne O’Connor
Part of the The International Society of Business, Economics, and Ethics Book Series book series (ISBEE, volume 4)


This chapter discusses community sustainability in relation to social impact of the implementation by the Vietnamese, Research Institute for Aquaculture No1 and NSW DPI of oyster farming into the Ban Sen Province in the Van Don district in North Vietnam, funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). A Photovoice project in which cameras and diaries were given to ten oyster farmers to record their story of impact from oyster farming was conducted in late 2011. Photo data was then coded into a Five Capitals Framework (environmental, human, social, institutional, produced). Results indicate oyster farming has been a largely positive impact on lives of farmers and their commune. Income from oyster farming has enabled diversification into other types of farming, provided jobs, more assets, better life quality, and opportunity for the young to stay in the commune. Social impact was often linked to the new industry with impact across community spirit and quality of life. Some negative impact issues relating to parasites, seed quality, some jobs that were boring and lacking satisfaction and low oyster prices were highlighted. Farmers indicated through photos that the next generation may stay in the area in oyster farming. Photovoice in conjunction with Five Capitals framework is recommended as a means of qualitatively describing the livelihood and community impacts of aid programs which are not captured by the usual economics-focused impact studies.


Rural Community Sustainability Vietnam Oyster Farming Photovoice Five Capitals 



Gratitude is expressed to the many people and organizations who made this study possible. Particular thanks is accorded to the ten oyster farmers who so willingly committed their time to this project and produced both photos and written explanations to tell their story of the impact of oyster farming. The efforts of Nguyen Thi Thanh An, Geoff Morris and Kieu Xuan Hung from ACIAR are warmly acknowledged, as is the assistance of Cao Truong Giang, Cao Van Hanh and Pham Van Nhiem, and Dr Le Xan, from RIA1. Thanks also to Mr Pham Ngoc Chanh (boat driver). The firsthand background information provided from local authorities at the commune and district levels was of great assistance in the conduct of this study.


  1. Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston, M., & Kent, J. (2004). Coping with a crisis: Human services in times of drought. Rural Society, 14, 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cocklin, C., & Alston, M. (Eds.). (2003). Community sustainability in rural Australia: A question of capital? Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  4. Dibden, J., & Cocklin, C. (2003). ‘Tarra’ Victoria. In C. Cocklin & M. Alston (Eds.), Community sustainability in rural Australia: A Question of capital? (pp. 177–201). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  5. Everitt J., & Annis, R. (2002). The sustainability of prairie rural communities. In C. Bowler, N. Bryant, & N. Nellies (Eds.), Contemporary rural systems in transition: (2), Economy and society (pp. 213–222). Walingford: CAN International.Google Scholar
  6. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). (2012). FAO yearbook: Fish and aquaculture statistics. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
  7. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed: New revisited 20th anniversary edition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, S. (1997). Introduction. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 1–12). Berkshire: The Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Herbert-Cheshire, L., & Lawrence, G. (2003). Monto, Queensland. In C. Cocklin & M. Alston (Eds.), Community sustainability in rural Australia: A question of capital (pp. 10–37). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  10. Jolly, C. (2010). Aquaculture and socio-economic growth and development: Enabling policies and partnership for improved benefits. Global conference on aquaculture 2010, Thailand. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.
  11. Kawakami, A., & Aton, K. (1998). Native Hawaiian curriculum development: A study identifying critical elements for success. Paper presented at the meeting of the national Education Association, Nashville, TN. &_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED447972&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED447972. Accessed 4 Feb 2013.
  12. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krannich, R., & Luloff, A. (1991). Problems of resource dependency in US rural communities. In A. Gileg, D. Briggs, R. Dilley, O. Furuseth, & G. McDonald (Eds.), Progress in rural policy and planning (pp. 5–18). London: Belhaven.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, G., (2005). Futures for rural Australia: From agricultural productivism to community stability. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University.Google Scholar
  15. Lebel, L., Nguyen, H. T., Amnuay, S., Suparb P. U., & Buatama, L. T. H. (2002). Industrial transformation and shrimp aquaculture in Thailand and Vietnam: Pathways to ecological, social, and economic sustainability? Journal of the Human Environment, 31(2), 311–323.Google Scholar
  16. Leffler, M. (2003). Oyster farming vs Oyster hunting. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
  17. Lehtonen, M. (2004). The environmental-social interface of sustainable development: Capabilities, social capital, institutions, Ecological Economics, 49, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacGregor, C., & Fenton, M. (1999). Community values provide a mechanism for measuring sustainability in small rural communities in Northern Australia. In Country Matters Conference Proceedings, 20–21 May. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Science.Google Scholar
  19. Neuman, W. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sydney: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  20. O’Meara, M. (1999). Creating and maintaining a vibrant community. In Country Matters Conference Proceedings, 20–21 May 1999. Canberra: National Convention Centre.Google Scholar
  21. Orange County Community Indicators Report. (2012). Accessed 14 Feb 2013.
  22. Pepperdine, S. (19–24 April 1998). Making peoples’ values count: Measuring rural community sustainability. Paper presented at 18th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  23. Perez-Sanchez, E., & Muir, J. (2003). Fishermen perception on resources management and aquaculture development in the Mecoacan estuary, Tabasco, Mexico. Ocean Coastal Management, 46, 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pierce J., & McKay, J. (2008). Our community capitals as we see them through photovoice: Cowell oyster industry in South Australia. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 15, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pierce, J., Thompson, K., Sharp, R., & Mckay, J. (2008). Their world is an oyster: Final report to the Eyre Regional Development Board. Adelaide: Hawke Institute for Sustainable Societies. The University of South Australia in conjunction with the School of Commerce, Division of Business, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Pintér, L., Hardi, P., & Bartelmus, P. (2005). Sustainable development indicators: Proposal for a way forward. Prepared for the United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (UN-DSD) IISD Publications Centre, United Nations.Google Scholar
  27. Pomeroy, A. (1997). Social indicators of sustainable agriculture. Wellington: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Roseland, M. (2005). Toward sustainable communities. Canada: New Society.Google Scholar
  30. Sell, J., & Zube, E. (1986). Perception and response to environmental change. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 3, 33–54.Google Scholar
  31. Smailes, P., & Hugo, G. (2003). “The Gilbert Valley” South Australia. In: C. Cocklin & M. Alston (Eds.), Community sustainability in Rural Australia: a question of capital? (pp. 65–106). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  32. Soja, E., (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Stayner, R. (2003). Guyra, New South Wales. In C. Cocklin & M. Alston (Eds.), Community sustainability in rural Australia: A question of capital (pp. 38–64). Wagga Wagga: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  34. Timmer, C. P. (1996). Agriculture and economic growth in Vietnam. Research in Domestic and International Agribusiness Management, 12, 161–203.Google Scholar
  35. Tonts, M. (2005). Competitive sport and social capital in rural Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1994). Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education & Behavior, 21(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, C., Burris M., & Xiang Y. P. (1996). Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: A participatory approach to reaching policymakers. Social Science & Medicine, 42(10), 1391–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Warburton, D. (1998). A passionate dialogue: Community and sustainable development. In D. Warburton (Ed.), Community and sustainable development: Participation in the future. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  39. White, K., O’Neill. B., & Tzankova, Z. (2004). At a crossroads: Will aquaculture fulfil the promise of the blue revolution?. Sea-Web Aquaculture Clearinghouse Report, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.Google Scholar
  40. World Commission on Environment and Development [WCED]. (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on environment and Development (chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland, and referred to as the Brundtland report). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Rural Health and Community DevelopmentUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Port Stephens Fisheries InstituteNSW Department of Primary IndustriesNelson BayAustralia

Personalised recommendations