Skip to main content

Brain-Computer Interfaces as an Emerging Assistive Technology (AT): The AT Professionals’ Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts

Abstract

Ever since scientists have started to think about controlling a computer with the human brain, there has been a debate on possible fields of application. Developing applications for people with no or very little muscle control has been an obvious field of attention. BCI technology has thus become a field of interest for Assistive Technology (AT) professionals, who for many years now have been working on enabling solutions for people with disabilities. Nevertheless, BCI research is very specific and so far most experiments have been run in research laboratories by specialized BCI teams. In recent years they have started sharing their knowledge with AT professionals, and experiments outside the lab have led to the first practical applications. In this article we will discuss aspects of this process seen from the point of view of AT professionals. We will explain to the reader who these AT experts are and where they typically work, as well as their aims and methodologies. The final sub-sections deal more specifically with the challenging process of taking BCI technology out of the laboratory and into AT centers and the end user’s own environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAATE. 2009. Strategic development. Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe. http://www.aaate.net/?q=node/12. Accessed 4 Jan 2013.

  • Batavia, A.I., and G.S. Hammer. 1990. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 27(4): 425–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. 2013. What is Universal Design. http://www.universaldesign.ie/. Accessed 5 May 2014.

  • Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demers, L., R. Weiss-Lambrou, and B. Ska. 2002. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability 14: 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donegan, M., P. Majaranta, J.P. Hansen, et al. 2011. Chapter 25: Conclusion and a look to the future. In Gaze interaction and applications of eye tracking: Advances in assistive technologies, ed. P. Majaranta, H. Aoki, M. Donegan, D.W. Hansen, J.P. Hansen, A. Hyrskykari, and K.J. Räihä, 365–376. Hershey: IGI Global. http://www.igi-global.com/book/gaze-interaction-application-eye-tracking/51941.

  • Federici, S., M.J. Scherer, F. Meloni, M. Corradi, D. Adya, M. Samant, M. Morris, and A. Stella. 2012. Assessing individual functioning and disability. In Assistive technology assessment handbook, 1st ed, ed. S. Federici and M.J. Scherer, 11–24. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, M.J., J.W. Jutai, M.J. Scherer, and F. DeRuyter. 2003. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation 25: 1243–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresswell, A., and E.J. Hoogerwerf. 2007. Guidelines for lifelong learning in assistive technology. Communication, computer access and environmental control. KPT Consortium. AIAS Bologna onlus. http://www.at4inclusion.org/kpt. Accessed 5 Jan 2013.

  • Holtz, E., T. Kaufmann, L. Desideri, M. Malavasi, E.J. Hoogerwerf, and A. Kübler. 2013. User centred design in BCI development. In Towards practical brain-computer interfaces, ed. B.Z. Allison, S. Dunne, R. Leeb, J.R. Millán, and A. Nijholt, 155–172. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerwerf, E.J., A. Lysley, and M. Clarke. 2002. BRIDGE. Assistive technology against social exclusion. BRIDGE Consortium. AIAS Bologna onlus. http://www.at4inclusion.org. Accessed 5 Jan 2013.

  • Hoogerwerf, E.J., S. Mongardi, P. Staiger-Sälzer, and C. Zickler. 2010. BCI research and user involvement: The role of independent AT centres in the TOBI Project. In Proceedings of the AAATE workshop Paper presented at the AAATE workshop 2010: AT Technology Transfer, 33–36. Sheffield 2010. http://www.aaate.net/sites/default/files/AAATEworkshopSheffield2010_proceedings.pdf.

  • ISO-9241-210. 2010. Human-centred design for interactive systems. Licensed to Dr. Hoogerwerf, ISO Store order #: 10-1173179/Downloaded: 2010-12-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, G. 2011. Design meets disability. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M.J. 1998. Matching person and technology: A series of assessments for evaluating predispositions to and outcomes of technology use in rehabilitation, education, the workplace and other settings. Rev. ed. Webster: Institute for Matching Person and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, E., G.J. Gelderblom, and L.P. de Witte. 2011. Development of an AT selection tool using the ICF model. Technology and Disability 23: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudsawad, P. 2007. Knowledge translation: Introduction to models, strategies, and measures. The University of Wisconsin-Madison/The National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research at the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Available at Http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/ktintro/allinone.html# def. Accessed 15 Dec 2012.

  • Vanhove, J.M. 2011. Ethical framework for the implementation and use of person centred technology for persons with disabilities. Impact-in-Europe Project. http://www.el-hosting.com/impact-in-europe/images/downloads/impact-ethical-framework.pdf Accessed 29 Dec 2012.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. Available via WHO. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.

  • Zickler, C., A. Riccio, F. Leotta, S. Hillian-Tress, S. Halder, E. Holz, P. Staiger-Sälzer, et al. 2011. A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 42(4): 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoogerwerf, EJ., Desideri, L., Malavasi, M., Rimondini, M., Donegan, M. (2014). Brain-Computer Interfaces as an Emerging Assistive Technology (AT): The AT Professionals’ Perspective. In: Grübler, G., Hildt, E. (eds) Brain-Computer-Interfaces in their ethical, social and cultural contexts. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8996-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics