Brain-Computer Interfaces as an Emerging Assistive Technology (AT): The AT Professionals’ Perspective
Ever since scientists have started to think about controlling a computer with the human brain, there has been a debate on possible fields of application. Developing applications for people with no or very little muscle control has been an obvious field of attention. BCI technology has thus become a field of interest for Assistive Technology (AT) professionals, who for many years now have been working on enabling solutions for people with disabilities. Nevertheless, BCI research is very specific and so far most experiments have been run in research laboratories by specialized BCI teams. In recent years they have started sharing their knowledge with AT professionals, and experiments outside the lab have led to the first practical applications. In this article we will discuss aspects of this process seen from the point of view of AT professionals. We will explain to the reader who these AT experts are and where they typically work, as well as their aims and methodologies. The final sub-sections deal more specifically with the challenging process of taking BCI technology out of the laboratory and into AT centers and the end user’s own environment.
KeywordsAssistive Technology Universal Design Mainstream Technology Preliminary Prototype Special Input Modality
- AAATE. 2009. Strategic development. Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe. http://www.aaate.net/?q=node/12. Accessed 4 Jan 2013.
- Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. 2013. What is Universal Design. http://www.universaldesign.ie/. Accessed 5 May 2014.
- Demers, L., R. Weiss-Lambrou, and B. Ska. 2002. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability 14: 101–105.Google Scholar
- Donegan, M., P. Majaranta, J.P. Hansen, et al. 2011. Chapter 25: Conclusion and a look to the future. In Gaze interaction and applications of eye tracking: Advances in assistive technologies, ed. P. Majaranta, H. Aoki, M. Donegan, D.W. Hansen, J.P. Hansen, A. Hyrskykari, and K.J. Räihä, 365–376. Hershey: IGI Global. http://www.igi-global.com/book/gaze-interaction-application-eye-tracking/51941.
- Federici, S., M.J. Scherer, F. Meloni, M. Corradi, D. Adya, M. Samant, M. Morris, and A. Stella. 2012. Assessing individual functioning and disability. In Assistive technology assessment handbook, 1st ed, ed. S. Federici and M.J. Scherer, 11–24. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Gresswell, A., and E.J. Hoogerwerf. 2007. Guidelines for lifelong learning in assistive technology. Communication, computer access and environmental control. KPT Consortium. AIAS Bologna onlus. http://www.at4inclusion.org/kpt. Accessed 5 Jan 2013.
- Holtz, E., T. Kaufmann, L. Desideri, M. Malavasi, E.J. Hoogerwerf, and A. Kübler. 2013. User centred design in BCI development. In Towards practical brain-computer interfaces, ed. B.Z. Allison, S. Dunne, R. Leeb, J.R. Millán, and A. Nijholt, 155–172. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hoogerwerf, E.J., A. Lysley, and M. Clarke. 2002. BRIDGE. Assistive technology against social exclusion. BRIDGE Consortium. AIAS Bologna onlus. http://www.at4inclusion.org. Accessed 5 Jan 2013.
- Hoogerwerf, E.J., S. Mongardi, P. Staiger-Sälzer, and C. Zickler. 2010. BCI research and user involvement: The role of independent AT centres in the TOBI Project. In Proceedings of the AAATE workshop Paper presented at the AAATE workshop 2010: AT Technology Transfer, 33–36. Sheffield 2010. http://www.aaate.net/sites/default/files/AAATEworkshopSheffield2010_proceedings.pdf.
- ISO-9241-210. 2010. Human-centred design for interactive systems. Licensed to Dr. Hoogerwerf, ISO Store order #: 10-1173179/Downloaded: 2010-12-20.Google Scholar
- Pullin, G. 2011. Design meets disability. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Scherer, M.J. 1998. Matching person and technology: A series of assessments for evaluating predispositions to and outcomes of technology use in rehabilitation, education, the workplace and other settings. Rev. ed. Webster: Institute for Matching Person and Technology.Google Scholar
- Steel, E., G.J. Gelderblom, and L.P. de Witte. 2011. Development of an AT selection tool using the ICF model. Technology and Disability 23: 1–6.Google Scholar
- Sudsawad, P. 2007. Knowledge translation: Introduction to models, strategies, and measures. The University of Wisconsin-Madison/The National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research at the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Available at Http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/ktintro/allinone.html# def. Accessed 15 Dec 2012.
- Vanhove, J.M. 2011. Ethical framework for the implementation and use of person centred technology for persons with disabilities. Impact-in-Europe Project. http://www.el-hosting.com/impact-in-europe/images/downloads/impact-ethical-framework.pdf Accessed 29 Dec 2012.
- World Health Organization (WHO). 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. Available via WHO. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.