Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex Education and Science Education in Faith-Based Schools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Handbook of Learning, Teaching and Leading in Faith-Based Schools

Abstract

The key issue for a faith-based school is the extent to which, if at all, its aims, ethos, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment should differ from other schools and the impact this has for its students on their learning, attitudes and dispositions. This chapter explores these issues with specific reference to the teaching of sex education and the teaching of science education. I conclude that the role of religion is somewhat different in science education and in sex education. In science education, a teacher needs to be sensitive to religious objections to aspects of the science curriculum for two reasons: first, out of respect for students; secondly, because not to be sensitive is to make learning in science less likely for some students. However, it is not the case that a science teacher should alter the science that is taught because of the religious views of students or anyone else. In sex education, though, religious views, while they should not have the power that some religious believers would like, nevertheless can, indeed often should, have a place in decision making. This is because of the central importance of values in general and religious views in particular for sex education and because values lack the degree of objectivity of scientific knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, S. (2003). Bone of contention: Is evolution true? (3rd ed.). Rugby: Biblical Creation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, J. (1984). Escaping from fundamentalism. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, S., & Katrak, Z. (2002). Faith, values and sex & relationships education. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W., & Letts, W. J., IV. (1998). The problem of dogmatism in science education. In J. T. Sears & J. C. Carper (Eds.), Curriculum, religion, and public education: Conversations for an enlarging public square (pp. 221–230). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Worship. (2000). Marriage. London: Church House.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCSF. (2007). Guidance on the place of creationism and intelligent design in science lessons. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20071204131026/http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890. Accessed 17 Nov 2013.

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. (French edition, R. Hurley, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graebsch, A., & Schiermeier, Q. (2006). Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe. Nature, 444, 406–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, J. M., & Reiss, M. J. (2003). Values in sex education: From principles to practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haydon, G. (2009). Faith in education: A tribute to Terence McLaughlin. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1983). Abusing science: The case against creationism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenderyou, G., & Porter, M. (Eds.). (1994). Sex education, values and morality. London: Health Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacEoin, D. (2009). Music, chess and other sins: Segregation, integration, and Muslim schools in Britain. London: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (2007). The history of the creationism/evolution controversy and likely future developments. In L. Jones & M. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism (pp. 11–29). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natsal. (2013). Publications. http://www.natsal.ac.uk/natsal-3/publications. Accessed 17 Nov 2013.

  • Oldfield, E., Hartnett, L., & Bailey, E. (2013). More than an educated guess: Assessing the evidence on faith schools. London: Theos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. E. (2006). Creation: Facts of life – How real science reveals the hand of God. Los Angeles: New Leaf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Jenkins, M., Hartas, D., & Irving, B. A. (2005). In good faith: Schools religion and public funding. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plimmer, I. (1994). Telling lies for God: Reason vs creationism. Milsons Point: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R., & Hall, L. (1995). The facts of life: The creation of sexual knowledge in Britain, 1650–1950. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, M. L. (2010). Secularism, religion and ‘progressive’ sex education. Sexualities, 13, 699–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (1998). Christian views of sex and sex education. In M. J. Reiss & S. A. Mabud (Eds.), Sex education and religion (pp. 135–149). Cambridge: The Islamic Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44, 157–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2013). Beliefs and the value of evidence. In J. K. Gilbert & S. M. Stocklmayer (Eds.), Communication and engagement with science and technology: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 148–161). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J., & Mabud, S. A. (Eds.). (1998). Sex education and religion. Cambridge: The Islamic Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerecnik, C., Schaalma, H., Gerjo, K., Meijer, S., & Poelman, J. (2010). An exploratory study of Muslim adolescents’ views on sexuality: Implications for sex education and prevention. BMC Public Health, 10, 533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. (2002). Living together and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Islamic Academy. (1991). Sex education in the school curriculum: The religious perspective – An agreed statement. Cambridge: The Islamic Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (Ed.). (1993). Religion, ethnicity & sex education: Exploring the issues – A resource for teachers and others working with young people. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (1997). Diversity, values and social change: Renegotiating a consensus on sex education. Journal of Moral Education, 26, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. C. C. (1975). The great brain robbery. Worthing: Henry E. Walter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors’ search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1026–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working Party of the Board for Social Responsibility. (1995). Something to celebrate: Valuing families in church and society. London: Church House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK

    Michael J. Reiss

Authors
  1. Michael J. Reiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Reiss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Judith D. Chapman

  2. Faculty of Education, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Sue McNamara

  3. Institute of Education, University of London, London, United Kingdom

    Michael J. Reiss

  4. Faculty of Education, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Yusef Waghid

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reiss, M.J. (2014). Sex Education and Science Education in Faith-Based Schools. In: Chapman, J., McNamara, S., Reiss, M., Waghid, Y. (eds) International Handbook of Learning, Teaching and Leading in Faith-Based Schools. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8972-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation