Video-Surveillance and the Production of Space in Urban Nightlife Districts

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is based on a research project that examines if and how technologically mediated forms of surveillance and policing improve the safety and wellbeing of nightlife consumers whilst at the same time also contributing to processes of socio-spatial exclusion of particular groups. By interrogating the triad of surveillance and policing, wellbeing and exclusion in nightlife districts in Dutch city centers we found that the effects of video-surveillance on the production of space are complex and ambiguous. Storylines used by local policy-makers with regard to CCTV differ considerably between cities and tend to overestimate the benefits of CCTV surveillance. Moreover, consumers’ awareness and knowledge of CCTV tends to be limited and only a few experiences a real sense of enhanced safety and wellbeing because of the presence of technology alone. At the same time, the effects of surveillance and policing on the exclusion of certain groups from nightlife districts are not equivocally supported by our initial findings either.

References

  1. Armitage, R. 2002. To CCTV or Not to CCTV? – A review of current research into the effectiveness of CCTV systems in reducing crime. London: Nacro.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, S., S. Fuller, and J. Painter. 2012. Wellbeing and place. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard-Wills, D. 2011. UK news media discourses of surveillance. The Sociological Quarterly 52: 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brands, J., T. Schwanen, and I. van Aalst. 2014. What are you looking at? A visitors’ perspective on CCTV in the night-time economy. European Urban and Regional Research, doi:10.1177/0969776413481369.
  5. Chatterton, P., and R. Hollands. 2003. Urban nightscapes: Youth cultures, pleasure spaces and corporate power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Conradson, D. 2005. Landscape, care and the relational self: Therapeutic encounters in rural England. Health & Place 11: 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delanda, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brain Massumi. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diener, E. 2009. The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleuret, S., and S. Atkinson. 2007. Wellbeing, health and geography: A critical review and research agenda. New Zealand Geographer 63: 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flight, S., and P. Hulshof. 2010. Roadmap Beeldtechnologie Veiligheidsdomein. Behoefte en Gewenste Innovaties voor ‘Veilig door Innovatie’. Amsterdam: DSP groep.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. 2002. The Archeology of Knowledge. Trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. Abingdon: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  13. Gemeente Groningen. 2011. Evaluatie Agressiedetectie. Groningen: Gemeente Groningen.Google Scholar
  14. Gemeente Utrecht. 2002. Convenant Veilig Uitgaan Binnenstad Utrecht 2002–2006. Utrecht: Gemeente Utrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, S.D.N. 2005. Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography 29(5): 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haggerty, K.D., and R.V. Ericsson. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hajer, M.A. 2005. Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE. In Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance, ed. D. Howarth and J. Torfing, 297–315. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, T., and P. Hubbard (eds.). 1998. The entrepreneurial city. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 71: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helms, G. 2008. Towards safe city centres? Remaking the spaces of an old-industrial city. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Hempel, L., and E. Töpfer. 2004. CCTV in Europe; final report. Urbaneye Working Paper no. 15. Berlin: Centre for technology and Society, Technical University of Berlin.Google Scholar
  22. Hubbard, P. 2005. The geographies of ‘going out’: Emotion and embodiment in the evening economy. In Emotional geographies, ed. L. Bondi, M. Smith, and J. Davidson, 117–137. Ashgate: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  23. Jayne, M., G. Valentine, and S.L. Holloway. 2011. Alcohol, drinking, drunkenness: (Dis)orderly spaces. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Judd, D., and S. Fainstein (eds.). 1999. The tourist city. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Klauser, F.R. 2007. Difficulties in revitalizing public space by CCTV: Street prostitution surveillance in the Swiss city of Olten. European Urban and Regional Studies 14: 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koskela, H. 2002. Video surveillance, gender, and the safety of public urban space: “Peeping Tom” goes high tech? Urban Geography 23: 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koskela, H. 2003. A two-edged sword – Public attitudes towards video surveillance in Helsinki. In The European group conference paper. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  28. Lyon, D. (ed.). 2003. Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Mann, S., J. Nolan, and B. Wellman. 2003. Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices as data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance & Society 1: 331–355.Google Scholar
  30. McCahill, M. 2002. The surveillance web: The rise of visual surveillance in an English city. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  31. McCahill, M., and C. Norris. 2002. CCTV in Britain. Urbaneye Working Paper no. 3. Berlin: Centre for technology and Society, Technical University of Berlin.Google Scholar
  32. Measham, F., and P. Hadfield. 2009. Everything starts with an ‘E’: Exclusion, ethnicity and elite formation in contemporary English clubland. Addiciones 21: 362–386.Google Scholar
  33. Miles, S., and R. Paddison. 2005. Introduction: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban Studies 42: 833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norris, C., and G. Armstrong. 1999. The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  35. Nouwt, S., B.R. de Vries, and D. Van der Burgt. 2005. Camera surveillance and privacy in the Netherlands. In Reasonable expectations of privacy? Eleven country reports on camera surveillance and workplace privacy, ed. S. Nouwt, B.R. de Vries, and C. Prins, 115–165. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts, M., and A. Eldridge. 2009. Planning the night-time city. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Schmid, H., W.D. Sahr, and J. Urry (eds.). 2011. Cities and fascination. Beyond the surplus of meaning. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Schreijenberg, A., J. Koffijberg, and S. Dekkers. 2009. Evaluatie Cameratoezicht op Openbare Plaatsen, Driemeting, Eindrapport. Amsterdam: Regioplan.Google Scholar
  39. Schwanen, T., I. van Aalst, J. Brands, and T. Timan. 2012. Rhythms of the night: Spatiotemporal inequalities in the night-time economy. Environment and Planning A 44(9): 2064–2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaw, R. 2010. Neoliberal subjectivities and the development of the night-time economy in British cities. Geography Compass 4: 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Talbot, D. 2007. Regulating the night: Race, culture ad exclusion in the making of the night-time economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Talbot, D., and M. Böse. 2007. Racism, criminalization and the development of night-time economies: Two case studies in London and Manchester. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30: 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Timan, T., and N. Oudshoorn. 2012. New technologies of surveillance? How citizens experience the use of mobile cameras in public nightscapes. Surveillance and Society 10(2): 167–181.Google Scholar
  44. Tops, P. 2007. Regime Veranderingen in Rotterdam. Hoe een Stadsbestuur Zichzelf Opnieuw Uitvond. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Atlas.Google Scholar
  45. Van Aalst, I., and I. van Liempt. 2011. Uitgaansstad onder spanning. Justitiële Verkenningen 37: 9–24.Google Scholar
  46. Van Aalst, I., and T. Schwanen. 2009. Omstreden nachten; angstgevoelens van jongeren in de uitgaansgebieden van Arnhem en Apeldoorn. In Omstreden Ruimte; over de Organisatie van Spontaniteit en Veiligheid, ed. H. Boutellier, N. Boonstra, and M. Ham, 157–175. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  47. Van Liempt, I., and I. van Aalst. 2012. Urban surveillance the struggle between safe and exciting nightlife districts. Surveillance & Society 9(3): 280–292.Google Scholar
  48. Van Noije, L., and K. Wittebrood. 2009. Overlast en verloedering ontsleuteld: veronderstelde en werkelijke effecten van veiligheidsbeleid. Den Haag: SCP.Google Scholar
  49. Van Schijndel, A., A. Schreijenberg, and G. Homburg. 2010. Evaluatie Cameratoezicht Gemeente Rotterdam. Amsterdam: Regioplan.Google Scholar
  50. Webster, W. 2009. CCTV policy in the UK: Reconsidering the evidence base. Surveillance & Society 6: 10–22.Google Scholar
  51. Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2003. The effects of closed-circuit television on crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587: 110–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2009. Making public places safer, surveillance and crime prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williams, R. 2008. Night spaces: Darkness, deterrioralization and social control. Space and Culture 11: 514–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winlow, S., and S. Hall. 2006. Violent night: Urban leisure and contemporary culture. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina van Aalst
    • 1
  • Tim Schwanen
    • 2
  • Ilse van Liempt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations