Abstract
A variety of applications of video recording in health care is growing including the development of a Digital Operation Room Assistant (DORA). This is a monitoring system, based on the analysis of video templates, that, similar to the black box in aviation, automatically records events in the operating room (OR). After the completion of the surgical procedure the video images may also be useful for other purposes such as the evaluation of the surgical technique or as an aid in training and education of medical staff and students. Yet, under Dutch privacy law, video images, once they are stored, are considered as personal data and legal demands have to be met to keep, use or delete these images.
While the value of video recording in the OR, − the enhancing of the quality of the surgical procedure and the patient’s safety – is widely acknowledged, concerns have risen. Medical professionals claim to be unfamiliar with the legal demands that have to be met and fear to unlawfully violate the patient’s privacy. Another concern is that the video images of the surgical procedure will be used in court proceedings and as such might lead to the physician’s liability or a disciplinary measure, such as an official warning.
In the Netherlands research was done on the legal implications of a Digital Operation Room Assistant. The aim of the study is to provide a legal framework comprising the prerequisites for the storage, application and deletion of video images of the surgical procedure. In addition the legal position of the medical professional should be clarified.
Legal demands related to the processing of personal data, such as the limitation, the quality, the specification of the purpose, the limited use and the openness of the video images, have to be taken into account. In addition measures should be taken to guarantee the safety of and the accountability for the video images. Video images of surgical procedures are considered as personal data concerning a person’s health and should be treated with even more care. The patient’s consent for video recording is obviously the most legitimate basis for video recording in this context. To make legal implications more explicit three situations are discerned in which video registration in the OR will take place. The application of the video images in the discerned situations has consequences for the patient’s consent for the video recording. As a rule the video images shall be deleted as soon as they have achieved the purpose they have been set up for. This is not the case when the video images shall be added to the medical file. It is advisable to set up a protocol about the correct procedure in this matter.
The data subject is not only the patient but also the medical professional who is filmed. The video recording should take place with his consent. By all means it must be clear that the video data shall not be used for other purposes (such as the assessment of the medical professional) than the original purpose for video registration.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Special personal data are defined as data regarding a person’s religion, race, political conviction, health, sexual life and data regarding the membership of a union. For an extended list and regulations see Personal Data Protection Act art. 16.
References
Aggarwal, R., T. Grantcharov, K. Moorthy, T. Milland, P. Papasavas, A. Dosis, F. Bello, and A. Darzi. 2007. An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room. Annals of Surgery 245: 992–999.
Blaauw, C.B., and J.H. Hubben. 2011. Video in de operatiekamer vanuit gezondheidsrechtelijk perspectief. Den Haag: SDU.
Blom, E., E. Verdaasdonk, L. Stassen, H. Stassen, P. Wieringa, and J. Dankelman. 2007. Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training. Surgical Endoscopy 21: 1560–1566.
Brandsma, G.M., A.J. Hondius, and J.H. Hubben. 2007. Video- en geluidopnames van de patiënt. Hoe kan de hulpverlener de privacy van de patiënt waarborgen? Journaal GGZ en recht 8: 158–163.
Hahm, J., H. Lee, S. Kim, S. Shimizh, H. Choi, Y. Ko, K. Lee, T. Kim, J. Yun, and Y. Park. 2007. A remote educational system in medicine using digital video. Hepato-Gastroenterology 54: 373–376.
Hu, P., Y. Xiao, D. Ho, C. Mackenzie, H. Hu, R. Voigt, and D. Martz. 2006. Advanced visualization platform for surgical operating room coordination: Distributed video board system. Surgical Innovation 13: 129–135.
KNMG (Royal Dutch Medical Association). 2010. Guidelines for the use of medical data. http://www.knmg.nl/publicatie/medischegegevens.
Lange, J.F., and L.P. Stassen. 2006. Best practice: De techniek van de laparoscopische cholecystectomie (Critical view of safety [CVS] in 7 stappen). Minimaal Invasieve Chirurgie. Plan van aanpak en beleid. NVEC 2009: 56–59.
Mackenzie, C., Y. Xiao, F. Hu, F. Seagull, and M. Fitzgerald. 2007. Video as a tool for improving tracheal intubation tasks for emergency medical and trauma care. Annals of Emergency Medicine 50: 436–442.
van Balen, M., J.H. Hubben, M. Groenewout, G.G. Zeeman, L.R. van Lonkhuijzen, and P.P. van den Berg. 2010. Video op de verloskamer. Medisch Contact 65(13): 590–591.
Verdaasdonk, E.G., L.P. Stassen, M. Elst, T.M. van der Karsten, and J. Dankelman. 2007. Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. An observational study. Surgical Endoscopy 21(2): 275–279.
Weinger, M., D. Gonzales, J. Slagle, and M. Syeed. 2004. Video capture of clinical care to enhance patient safety. Quality & Safety in Health Care 13: 136–144.
Xiao, Y., S. Schimpff, C. Mackenzie, R. Merrell, E. Entin, R. Voigt, and B. Jarrell. 2007. Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment. Surgical Innovation 14: 52–61.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO Grant 313-99-003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blaauw, C.B., van den Dobbelsteen, J.J., Jansen, F.W., Hubben, J.H. (2014). Privacy Aspects of Video Recording in the Operating Room. In: van den Hoven, J., Doorn, N., Swierstra, T., Koops, BJ., Romijn, H. (eds) Responsible Innovation 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8955-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8956-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)