Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Innovation, Learning and Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Innovation 1

Abstract

This paper takes as a starting point that it is a broad societal responsibility to stimulate the development and uptake of sustainable innovations. In order to pursue this societal responsibility, insights derived from systems’ approaches to sustainable innovation will be connected to reflections on responsibility. A core understanding of systems’ approaches is that actors from different institutional domains have to create a shared future orientation that directs innovation in a desirable way. This implies that boundaries between institutional domains have to be broken down, while these boundaries have been erected to hold individual actors accountable for their actions and decisions. The tension between these conflicting responsibility claims will be addressed here and described against the background of a number of societal developments that not only complicate the facilitation of sustainable innovation via the development of shared future visions, but also present new challenges for reflections on responsible innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basart, Josep, and Montse Serra. 2013. Engineering ethics beyond engineers’ ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(1): 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1989. Democracy and dictatorship: The nature and limits of state power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark A.P. 1998. The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeman, Gerard. 2006. Cultivating trust. How do public policies become trusted? Rotterdam: Optima Grafische Communicatie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Halina Szejnwald, Philip Vergragt, Ken Green, and Luca Berchicci. 2003. Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15(3): 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumsen, Michael. 2011. Sustainability, ethics, and technology. In Ethics, technology, and engineering. An introduction, ed. I. Van de Poel and L. Royakkers. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Neil. 2007. The politics of the environment ideas, activism, policy. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CBS. 2011. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/arbeid-sociale-zekerheid/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2011/2011-3490-wm.htm. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek 2011. Cited 13 Sept 2012.

  • Chandler, A.D. 1977. The visible hand. The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuppen, Eefje. 2009. Putting perspectives into participation. Constructive conflict methodology for problem structuring in stakeholder dialogues. Oisterwijk: Box Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuppen, E., S. Breukers, M. Hisschemöller, and E. Bergsma. 2010. Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 69(3): 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A., and C.E. Lindblom. 1963. Politics, economics, and welfare. Planning and politico-economic systems resolved into basic social processes. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, W., M. Ekelenkamp, F.J.P.M. Hoefnagel, and M. Scheltema (eds.) 1999. Over publieke en private verantwoordelijkheden. Edited by W. R. v. h. Regeringsbeleid. The Hague: WRR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, L. 1977. From Mandeville to Marx. The genesis and triumph of economic ideology. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezrahi, Y. 1990. The descent of Icarus. Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Brian. 1975. Social theory and political practice. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1998. The affluent society. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, Stephen M. 2004. Ethics and global climate change. Ethics 114(3): 555–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmendia, Eneko, and Sigrid Stagl. 2010. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economics 69(8): 1712–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, Peter. 1973. The enlightenment: An interpretation. The science of freedom. London: Wildwood House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31(8–9): 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. 2004. Understanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, ed. B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, and K. Green. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 2009. The politics of climate change. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T.F. 1995. Boundaries of science. In Boundaries of science, ed. S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, and T.J. Pinch. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, John. 2000. Vision assessment to support shaping 21st century society? Technology assessment as a tool for political judgement. In Vision assessment: Shaping technology in 21st century society, ed. J. Grin and A. Grunwald. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, John, Henk Van de Graaf, and Rob Hoppe. 1997. Technology assessment through interaction. The Hague: Rathenau Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffman, Willem. 2003. Boundaries of regulatory science. Eco/toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England, and the Netherlands, 1970–1995. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M.P., R.A.A. Suurs, S.O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R.E.H.M. Smits. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(4): 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1982. Shifting involvements. Private interest and public action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1995. The age of extremes: The short twentieth century, 1914–1991. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, Dave, Marleen van de Kerkhof, and Udo Pesch. 2007. The nature of the beast: Are citizens’ juries deliberative or pluralist? Policy Sciences 40(4): 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Jane. 1992. Systems of survival. A dialogue on the moral foundations of commerce and politics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The fifth branch. Science advisers as policymakers. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997. Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science 6(3): 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, Hans. 1985. The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Linda M. 2002. Learning in wind turbine development. A comparison between the Netherlands and Denmark. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, Rene, and Jan Rotmans. 2004. Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. In System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy, ed. B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, and K. Green. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunneman, Harry. 1984. Habermas’ theorie van het communicatieve handelen. Meppel/ Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, Loet, and Martin Meyer. 2003. The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics 58(2): 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E., and D.K. Cohen. 1979. Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, Marc. 2001. Are we at the cutting edge or the blunt edge?: Improving NGO organizational performance with private and public sector strategic management frameworks. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11(3): 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, Derk. 2007. Transition management new mode of governance for sustainable development. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Th.J. 1969. The end of liberalism: Ideology, policy, and the crisis of public authority. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Stuart, and Jacqueline Kam. 2007. Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies 44(4): 640–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, James. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences 42(4): 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. 1952. Bureaucratic structure and personality. In Reader in bureaucracy, ed. R.K. Merton. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert King. 1979. The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelfelder, Diane, and Sharon Jones. 2013. Sustaining engineering codes of ethics for the twenty-first century. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(1): 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu. 2002. The spirit of the laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, Stephanie. 2012. The authority to do good: Constraining and enabling socially responsible lending behavior in a public mortgage program. Public Administration Review 72(3): 430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, Karel F. 2006. Sustainable development for engineers: A handbook and resource guide. Sheffield: Greenlead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D, and T. Gaebler. 2012. Reinventing government. How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesch, Udo. 2005. The predicaments of publicness. An inquiry into the conceptual ambiguity of public administration. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesch, Udo. 2008a. Administrators and accountability: The plurality of value systems in the public domain. Public Integrity 10(4): 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesch, Udo. 2008b. The publicness of public administration. Administration & Society 40(2): 170–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesch, Udo. 2012. Overcoming regimes by regimes. In: Proceedings of IST 2012. 3rd international conference on sustainability transitions, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesch, Udo, Dave Huitema, and Matthijs Hisschemöller. 2012. A boundary organization and its changing environment: The Netherlands environmental assessment agency MNP. Environment and Planning C 30(3): 487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2008. Access to medicines. Public Health Ethics 1(2): 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The development of the modern state: A sociological introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 2001. The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist, Jaco. 2007. Backcasting for a sustainable future: The impact after 10 years. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist, Jaco, and Philip Vergragt. 2006. Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38(9): 1027–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, Arie, and R. Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change, ed. S. Rayner and E.L. Malone. Columbus: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, Jan, and Derk Loorbach. 2009. Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(2): 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, Jan, Rene Kemp, and Marjolein Van Asselt. 2001. More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot, Johan, and Arie Rip. 1997. The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54(2–3): 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, G. 1960. The public interest. A critique of the theory of a political concept. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. 1998. The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1989. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1998. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. A selected edition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adrian, Andy Stirling, and Frans Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34(10): 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self. The making of the modern identity. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Kulve, Haico, and Arie Rip. 2011. Constructing productive engagement: Pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis F. 1980. Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. The American Political Science Review 74(4): 905–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, Gregory C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12): 817–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Poel, Ibo. 2000. On the role of outsiders in technical development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12(3): 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., Albert Faber, Annemarth M. Idenburg, and Frans H. Oosterhuis. 2006. Survival of the greenest: Evolutionary economics and policies for energy innovation. Environmental Sciences 3(1): 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gunsteren, Herman. 1994. Culturen van besturen. Amsterdam/Meppel: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lente, Harro. 1993. Promising technology: The dynamics of expectations in technological developments. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbong, Geert, Frank W. Geels, and Rob Raven. 2008. Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20(5): 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Jelle, and Anton Hemerijck. 1997. A Dutch miracle: Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of justice. A defense of pluralism and equality. Philadelphia: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1984. Liberalism and the art of separation. Political Theory 12(3): 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, P., Leo Jansen, G. Van Grootveld, E. Van Spiegel, and Philip Vergragt. 2000. Sustainable technology development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1972. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Kees. 2003. Verkeerd spoor. De crisis bij de NS. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: L.J. Veen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter. 2001. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Donna J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review 16(4): 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technology, Management and Policy, Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Udo Pesch

Authors
  1. Udo Pesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udo Pesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Jeroen van den Hoven

  2. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands

    Neelke Doorn

  3. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Tsjalling Swierstra

  4. Tilburg Law School, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Bert-Jaap Koops

  5. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Henny Romijn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pesch, U. (2014). Sustainable Innovation, Learning and Responsibility. In: van den Hoven, J., Doorn, N., Swierstra, T., Koops, BJ., Romijn, H. (eds) Responsible Innovation 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation