Advertisement

Becoming a Practitioner: Professional Learning as a Social Practice

  • Silvia GherardiEmail author
  • Manuela Perrotta
Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

A practice-based interpretative framework for reading the process of becoming a professional as a social practice is developed to examine the ecology of the human and non-human actors involved in induction to the organization and seduction by the profession. We argue that professionals undergo induction into the organization while they undergo seduction by the profession. The chapter illustrates the situatedness of this process in relation to different types of organizations (private, public, network) in order to analyse the relation between the induction process and the actors that influence it. Three different models of induction are described: (a) in a professional bureaucracy, socialization precedes selection, and the key actor is the profession; (b) in a small private organization, induction is almost exclusively managed by the community of practice in the form of seduction by the profession; (c) in a large network of organizations, induction is explicitly managed by the organization and becomes a means to transmit the organizational culture.

Because the process of becoming a professional is a continuous process throughout working life, the tensions and contradictions that characterize its accomplishment are discussed in relation to the issues of behaviour control versus professional control, managerialism versus professionalism and identity work.

This chapter proposes that induction is not solely the effect of encounters between individuals and organizations, because two other agents are involved in the process: the profession and the community of practice.

Keywords

Authoring Induction Community of practice Practice-based studies Professional control Situated curriculum Socialization 

References

  1. Allen, G. (2006). Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover? Journal of Management, 32, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 847–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Güttel, W. H. (2010). Staff induction practices and organizational socialization: A review and extension of the debate. Society and Business Review, 5(1), 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardts, J., Jansen, P., & van der Velde, M. (2001). The breaking in of new employees: Effectiveness of socialization tactics and personnel instruments. Journal of Management Development, 20(2), 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. K., & Saks, A. M. (1996). Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, P. (1995). Medical talk and medical work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in work related activities: A longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bjørkeng, K., & Clegg, S. (2010). Becoming DragonBankers: Constructing practice through processes of socially situated learning. Society and Business Review, 5(1), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 106–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and bureaucratization. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruni, A., & Gherardi, S. (2001). Omega’s story: The heterogeneous engineering of a gendered professional self. In M. Dent & S. Whitehead (Eds.), Managing professional identities: Knowledge, performativity and the “new” professional (pp. 174–198). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Calàs, M., & Smircich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organization Studies, 12(4), 567–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlsen, A. (2006). Organizational becoming as dialogic imagination of practice. The case of the indomitable Gauls. Organization Science, 17(1), 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chia, R. (2003). Ontology: Organization as “world making”’. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organizations: Point-counterpoint in organization studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, I. J. (1996). Theories of action and praxis. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 111–142). Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Anderson, N. (2002). Newcomer adjustment: The relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cunliffe, A. (2001). Managers as practical authors: Reconstructing our understanding of management practice. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281.Google Scholar
  25. Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization, dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Danielson, M. M. (2004). A theory of continuous socialization for organizational renewal. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 354–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elkjaer, B. (2003). Social learning theory: Learning as participation in social processes. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organisational learning and knowledge management (pp. 38–53). Malden/Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Elkjaer, B., & Huysman, M. (2008). Social world theory and organizational learning. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 170–177). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar
  30. Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 406–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farrell, C. M., & Morris, J. (2003). The neo-bureaucratic state: Professionals and managers and professional managers in schools, general practices and social work. Organisation, 10(1), 129–157.Google Scholar
  33. Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  34. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Gherardi, S. (2009). Communities of practice or practices of a community? In S. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds.), Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 514–530). Thousand Oaks/Londra/New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gherardi, S. (2011). Organizational learning: The sociology of practice. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 43–65). Malden/Oxford/Melbourne/Berlin: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Gherardi, S., & Perrotta, M. (2010). Where is induction? Profession, peer group and organization in contention. Society and Business Review, 5(1), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gherardi, S., & Perrotta, M. (2011). Egg dates sperm: A tale of a practice change and its stabilization. Organization, 18(5), 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations: The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning: Journal for Managerial and Organizational Learning, 29(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Strati, S. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14(3), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weindenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  43. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinning, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hafferty, F. W., & Franks, R. (1994). The hidden curriculum, ethics, teaching and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine, 69(11), 861–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones, A. (1998). (Re)producing gender cultures: Theorizing gender in investment banking recruitment. Geoforum, 29(4), 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 14, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Luke, H. (2003). Medical education and sociology of medical habitus: ‘It’s not about the stethoscope!’. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Major, D. A. (2000). Effective newcomer socialization into high-performance organizational cultures. In N. M. Ashkanasy (Ed.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 355–368). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miettinen, R., & Virkunnen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structure of organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Muzio, D., & Kirkpatrick, I. (2011). Reconnecting professions and organizations. Current Sociology, 59(4), Special issue.Google Scholar
  56. Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professionals fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1349–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Østerlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2005). Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society, 21(2), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perrotta, M. (2008). Riproduzione assistita e innovazione tecnologica: organizzare tecnologie, saperi e corpi”. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento.Google Scholar
  59. Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 456–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rowe, W. G., O’Brien, J., Rouse, M. J., & Nixon, R. D. (2012). Navy stories: Behavior versus professional control. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skeats, J. (1991). Successful induction: How to get the most from your employees. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  62. Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 292–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tousijn, W. (2012). Integrating health and social care: Interprofessional relations of multidisciplinary teams in Italy. Current Sociology, 60(4), 522–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tuttle, M. (2002). A review and critique of Van Maanen and Schein’s ‘toward a theory of organizational socialization’ and implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 66–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Maanen, J. (1976). Breaking-in: Socialization to work. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 67–130). Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  66. Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209–264.Google Scholar
  67. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  68. Witman, Y., Smid, G. A. C., Meurs, P. L., & Willems, D. L. (2010). Doctor in the lead: Balancing between two worlds. Organization, 18(4), 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.School of Business and ManagementQueen Mary, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations