Advertisement

Promoting Practice-Based Innovation Through Learning at Work

  • Per-Erik EllströmEmail author
  • Per Nilsen
Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This chapter defines the concepts of innovation and practice-based innovation and describes some key characteristics of practice-based knowledge and research-based knowledge and how these two types of knowledge can be integrated to facilitate creative learning and practice-based innovation. Creative learning is assumed to occur when individuals or groups in an organization question established thought and action patterns and break away from routinized, habitual procedures to develop new ways of handling the duties and tasks involved in a job. In this way, creative learning can be a driving force for change and innovation in organizations. Reflection in the workplace is proposed as a mechanism for facilitation of creative learning and practice-based innovation. Although the literature on reflection provides strong arguments in favour of such activities, empirical research has described many challenges to reflection in the workplace. Reflection is often not allotted formal priority on the management agenda. Yet the potential of reflection cannot be fully realized without formalizing reflection as an expected legitimized activity in the workplace.

Keywords

Innovation Practice-based innovation Research-based knowledge Practice-based knowledge Workplace learning Adaptive learning Creative learning Reflection 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P. S., Kwon, S.-W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359–376.Google Scholar
  3. Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.Google Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.Google Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2012). Explaining innovation at work: A socio-personal account. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Billett, S., Smith, R., & Barker, M. (2005). Understanding work, learning and the remaking of cultural practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(3), 219–237.Google Scholar
  9. Bilson, A. (2006). Rationalities, reflection and research. In S. White, J. Fook, & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 135–143). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  11. Boud, D., Cressey, P., & Docherty, P. (2006). Setting the scene for productive reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 3–10). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Brante, T. (2010). Professional fields and truth regimes: In search of alternative approaches. Comparative Sociology, 9, 843–886.Google Scholar
  13. Brookfield, S. (1990). Using critical incidents to explore learners’ assumptions. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 177–193). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2005). Predicting health behaviour. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cramer, P. (1991). The development of defence mechanisms: Theory, research, and assessment. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Cressey, P., Boud, D., & Docherty, P. (2006). The emergence of productive reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 11–26). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. De Geus, A. (1992). The living company. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  18. Desforges, C. (2000). Putting educational research to use through knowledge transformation. Keynote lecture to the Further Education Research Network Conference, Coventry, 12 Dec 2000. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: Heath.Google Scholar
  20. Docherty, P., Boud, D., & Cressey, P. (2006). Lessons and issues for practice and development. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 193–206). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Dopson, S., Locock, L., Gabbay, J., Ferlie, E., & Fitzgerald, L. (2005). Evidence-based health care and the implementation gap. In S. Dopson & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Knowledge to action? – Evidence-based health care in context (pp. 28–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  23. Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation. Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & McKelvey, M. (2001). Innovation and employment: Process versus product innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Ellström, P.-E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Conceptual issues and critical conditions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 421–435.Google Scholar
  26. Ellström, P.-E. (2006a). The meaning and role of reflection in informal learning at work. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 43–53). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Ellström, P.-E. (2006b). Two logics of learning. In E. Antonacopoulou, P. Jarvis, V. Andersen, B. Elkjær, & S. Høyrup (Eds.), Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning (pp. 33–49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Ellström, P.-E. (2010a). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.Google Scholar
  29. Ellström, P.-E. (2010b). Organizational learning. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 47–52). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. Ellström, P.-E. (2011). Informal learning at work: Conditions, processes and logics. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 105–119). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Ellström, P.-E., & Kock, H. (2009). Competence development in the workplace: Concepts, strategies, and effects. In K. Illeris (Ed.), International perspectives on competence development (pp. 34–54). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Elmholdt, C., & Brinkmann, S. (2006). Discursive practices at work – Constituting the reflective learner. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 170–180). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Engeström, Y. (1988). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  34. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  35. Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201–221). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Evans, K., & Waite, E. (2010). Stimulating the innovative potential of ‘routine’ workers through workplace learning. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16(2), 243–258.Google Scholar
  37. Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H., & Unwin, L. (2006). Improving workplace learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Evans, K., Waite, E., & Kersh, N. (2011). Towards a social ecology of adult learning in and through the workplace. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 356–370). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Fenwick, T. J. (2003). Professional growth plans: Possibilities and limitations of an organization-wide employee development strategy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
  41. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row and Peterson.Google Scholar
  42. Fitzgerald, L., & Dopson, S. (2005). Knowledge, credible evidence, and utilization. In S. Dopson & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Knowledge to action? – Evidence-based health care in context (pp. 132–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.Google Scholar
  44. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology. A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–340). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  46. Garvin, D. A. (2000). Learning in action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  47. Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97.Google Scholar
  48. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  51. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  53. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375–387.Google Scholar
  54. Hansen, M., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106.Google Scholar
  55. Hislop, D. (2005). Knowledge management in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hommen, L. (2000). Innovation and qualification: Institutional challenges (Working Paper, Tema T). Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  57. Høyrup, S. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach (pp. 3–33). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Hunter, L., Beaumont, P., & Lee, M. (2002). Knowledge management practice in Scottish law firms. Human Resource Management, 12(2), 4–21.Google Scholar
  59. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.Google Scholar
  60. Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Kock, H., & Ellström, P.-E. (2011). Formal and integrated strategies for competence development in SMEs. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  62. Lam, A. (2005). Organizational innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 115–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  64. Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  65. Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable knowledge. Social science and social problem solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (Eds.). (2006). How Europe’s economies learn. Coordinating competing models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Loughran, J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London: Palmer Press.Google Scholar
  68. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 23–42.Google Scholar
  70. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Nielsen, P. (1999). Competition and transformation in the learning economy illustrated by the Danish case. Revue D’Économie Industrielle, 88(2), 67–89.Google Scholar
  71. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  72. McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118–131.Google Scholar
  73. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  74. Miles, M. B. (Ed.). (1964). Innovation in education. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  75. Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304–337.Google Scholar
  76. Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  77. Nevin, J. S. (2006). Psychology – Concepts and applications. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  78. Nilsen, P. (2010). Praktiknära innovationer genom integration av praktik- och forskningsbaserad kunskap. In P. Nilsen (Ed.), Implementation – teori och tillämpning i hälso- och sjukvård (pp. 125–144). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  79. Nilsen, P., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Fostering practice-based innovation through reflection at work. In H. Melkas & V. Harmakorpi (Eds.), Practice-based innovation: Insights, applications and policy implications (pp. 155–172). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  80. Nilsen, P., Nordström, G., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012). Integrating research-based and practice-based knowledge through workplace reflection. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(6), 403–415.Google Scholar
  81. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosière, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 491–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  83. Olsen, S. E., & Rasmussen, J. (1989). The reflective expert and the prenovice. In L. Bainbridge & S. A. Ruiz Quintanilla (Eds.), Developing skills with information technology (pp. 9–33). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  84. Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). The innovating organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  85. Price, O. M., Boud, D., & Scheeres, H. (2012). Creating work: Employee-driven innovation through work practice reconstruction. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach (pp. 77–91). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390–395.Google Scholar
  87. Redmond, B. (2006). Reflection in action. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  88. Rushmer, R., & Davies, H. T. O. (2004). Unlearning in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl II), ii10–ii15.Google Scholar
  89. Ryle, G. (1949/2002). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  90. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  91. Schenkel, A. (2006). Disciplined reflection or communities of practice? In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work (pp. 69–79). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner – How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  93. Schumpeter, J. A. (1980). Theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Somerset: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  94. Seibert, K. W., & Daudelin, M. W. (1999). The role of reflection in managerial learning. Westport: Quorum.Google Scholar
  95. Sevón, G. (1996). Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 49–67). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  96. Shani, A. B. R., & Docherty, P. (2003). Learning by design: Building sustainable organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  97. Strampel, K., & Oliver, R. (2007). Using technology to foster reflection in higher education. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007. Available from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/strampel.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2010.
  98. Svensson, L., & Aagaard Nielsen, K. (2006). Action research and interactive research. In K. Aagaard Nielsen & L. Svensson (Eds.), Action research and interactive research. Beyond practice and theory (pp. 13–44). Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google Scholar
  99. Svensson, L., Ellström, P.-E., & Åberg, C. (2004). Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 479–491.Google Scholar
  100. Trinder, L. (2006). A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice – A critical appraisal (pp. 212–241). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  101. Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25, 90–103.Google Scholar
  102. Waite, E., Evans, K., & Kersh, N. (2012). Employee-driven innovation amongst ‘routine’ employees in the UK. The role of organizational ‘strategies’ and individual ‘tactics’. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafus-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation. A new approach (pp. 149–166). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  103. Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.Google Scholar
  104. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioural Sciences and LearningLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.HELIX VINN Excellence CentreLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  3. 3.Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations