Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of some influential perspectives on the relationships between professional work and professional knowledge. We build upon a number of recent developments in theories of knowledge, skill, expertise, capability and action to help reframe understandings of professional knowledge as culturally and socially situated and materially grounded. We draw on ideas from cognitive ecology and developmental psychology to argue that effective professional action often depends upon tools and resources that come to hand in the workplace – it is the accomplishment of an “extended mind”. We also use recent research on the active nature of perception to argue that professional expertise is often highly dependent on “conceptual perception” and “sensory intelligence”. We suggest that employers and providers of professional education, and quite possibly students themselves, expect too much from the kinds of knowledge that can most readily be acquired in formal education settings: explicit, conceptual and principles-based knowledge. When employers comment negatively on the sharp contrast between the practical capabilities of new graduates and the capabilities of their more experienced workers, part of what they are noticing is – we argue – emergent from, and constitutively entangled with, the workplace setting. A richer understanding of how effective and innovative professional practitioners do what they do is needed, to make progress in the design and evaluation of professional education programs.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, I., & Kraus, V. (1985). Components of occupational prestige evaluations. Work and Occupations, 12, 23–39.
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 247–260.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Situating concepts. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 236–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 79–91.
Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London: Sage.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Billett, S. (Ed.). (2010). Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches. Dordrecht: Springer.
Carr-Saunders, A., & Wilson, P. (1933). The professions. Oxford: Clarendon.
Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478–484.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 361–385.
Clark, R. C. (2008). Building expertise: Cognitive methods for training and performance improvement (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.
Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning to be professionals. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 679–691.
Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Del Mar, M. (2010, March 29–30). Thinking with the senses in legal playgrounds: A sketch towards multisensory legal education. Paper presented at the BILETA conference.
Del Mar, M. (2011). Legal understanding and the affective imagination. In P. Maharg & C. Maughan (Eds.), Affect and legal education: Emotion in learning and teaching the law (pp. 177–193). Farnham: Ashgate.
Derry, S. J., Schunn, C. D., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.). (2005). Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Edwards, A. (2010). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ellsworth, P. C. (2005). Legal reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 685–704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2012). Concept formation in the wild. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 201–206.
Eraut, M. (1985). Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 10(2), 117–133.
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.
Eraut, M. (2010). Knowledge, working practices and learning. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 37–58). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organization Studies, 30(1), 7–30.
Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2009). Representing models of practice. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennet, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects (pp. 20–40). Hershey: Idea Group.
Farrell, L. (2006). Making knowledge common: Literacy & knowledge at work. New York: Peter Lang.
Glazer, N. (1974). Schools of the minor professions. Minerva, 12(3), 346–364.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23.
Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). The development of epistemic fluency: Learning to think for a living. In A. Brew & J. Sachs (Eds.), Transforming a university: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice (pp. 57–68). Sydney: University of Sydney Press.
Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2009, July 6–9). Teachers’ design knowledge, epistemic fluency and reflections on students’ experiences. In H. Wozniak & S. Bartoluzzi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd HERDSA annual conference: The student experience, Darwin, Australia: HERDSA (pp. 154–162).
Goodyear, P., & Steeples, C. (1998). Creating shareable representations of practice. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 6, 16–23.
Goodyear, P., & Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(4), 351–368.
Harper, D. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1395–1416.
Hoffmann, M. H. G., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). What you should know to survive in knowledge societies: On a semiotic understanding of ‘knowledge’. Semiotica, 157(1/4), 105–142.
Holyoak, K., & Morrison, R. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoy, A. W., & Murphy, P. K. (2001). Teaching educational psychology to the implicit mind. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 145–186). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lave, J. (2012). Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 156–171.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (forthcoming). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and working knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456.
Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.
Mulcahy, D. (2011). Teacher professional becoming: A practice-based, actor network theory perspective. In L. Scanlon (Ed.), ‘Becoming’ a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning (pp. 219–244). Dordrecht: Springer.
Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and changing beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 305–324). Mahwah: LEA.
Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2010). Objectual practice and learning in professional work. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice (pp. 82–103). Dordrecht: Springer.
Nersessian, N. J. (2012). Engineering concepts: The interplay between concept formation and modeling practices in bioengineering sciences. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 222–239.
Nonaka, I. (2004). The knowledge creating company. In H. Takeuchi & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Hitotsubashi on knowledge creation (pp. 29–46). Singapore: Wiley.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Why do firms differ? The theory of the knowledge creating firm. In K. Ichijo & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Knowledge creation and management: New challenges for managers (pp. 13–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norman, G., Eva, K., Brooks, L., & Hamstra, S. (2006). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 339–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ohlsson, S. (1995). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modelling. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 37–62). London: Pergamon.
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.
Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. In D. Shils (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 536–547). New York: Macmillan.
Patel, V. L., Arocha, J. F., & Zhang, J. (2005). Thinking and reasoning in medicine. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 727–750). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scanlon, L. (Ed.). (2011). ‘Becoming’ a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning. Dordrecht: Springer.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. (2002). From technical rationality to reflection-in-action. In R. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning: Perspectives on learning (Vol. 1, pp. 40–61). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 278–298.
Smith, L. B., & Sheya, A. (2010). Is cognition enough to explain cognitive development? Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 725–735.
Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 343–348.
Southerland, S., Sinatra, G., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325–351.
Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 37–54). Pitman: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(4), 387–420.
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Szymanski, M. H., & Whalen, J. (Eds.). (2011). Making work visible: Ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993.
Tuomi-Grohn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Turnbull, D. (2000). Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Usher, R., Bryant, I., & Johnston, R. (1997). Adult education and the postmodern challenge. London: Routledge.
Virkkunen, J., & Ristimäki, P. (2012). Double stimulation in strategic concept formation: An activity-theoretical analysis of business planning in a small technology firm. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 273–286.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1993). Working knowledge in teaching. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 100–123). London: Falmer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P. (2014). Professional Work and Knowledge. In: Billett, S., Harteis, C., Gruber, H. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8901-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8902-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)