Abstract
Professions are usually defined as occupations that require expert training at an academic level and are built on a set of standards that have to be met by members of a given profession. These standards not only apply to certain kinds of expert knowledge that are expected of professionals but also ethical standards in relation to the usage of this expert knowledge. However, apart from possible failures to meet these requirements, professionals, like anybody else, normally do not always act according to one guideline alone. Their actions are rather tuned to different situational cues. The article explores what kind of situations can be distinguished on a theoretical basis, how far such differentiations are acceptable or even appropriate and where they are not, and how situational adaptation works. The paper ends with deriving implications for professional practice and vocational education and training.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Kohlberg first introduced these forms as “sub-stages” (see e.g. 1984), but played them down later and spoke of “types”, because he noticed anomalies in the developmental sequence (Colby and Kohlberg 1987). From the point of view of the neo-Kohlbergian taxonomy, however, these anomalies are integrated and therefore constitute no systematic problem anymore.
- 2.
In some earlier presentations of the taxonomy the stages were called levels and numbered only 1–3 recursively (following the hierarchically integrated dialectical structure; see Minnameier 2000). However, in order to make the main relations to Kohlberg’s stages more salient, they are numbered 1 through 9 here. This also indicates that there are forms of ethical reflection that are not included in Kohlberg’s stages at all and that go beyond his framework (for more details and the explication of stages and differences to Kohlberg’s view see Minnameier 2000, 2001).
- 3.
To be sure, Kohlberg and Candee’s account is not free from inconsistencies that are revealed and discussed in Minnameier (2013).
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Abbott, A. (1991). The order of professionalization. Work and Occupations, 18, 355–384.
Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone – especially ourselves. New York: HarperCollins.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.
Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beck, K. (1997). Die Zukunft der Beruflichkeit. In M. Liedtke (Ed.), Berufliche Bildung: Geschichte, Gegenwart, Zukunft (pp. 351–369). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Beck, K. (1999). Wirtschaftserziehung und Moralerziehung – ein Widerspruch in sich? Zur Kritik der Kohlbergschen Moralentwicklungstheorie. Pädagogische Rundschau, 53, 9–28.
Beck, K. (2008). Moral judgment in economic situations. In F. K. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved – Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp. 359–370). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Beck, K., & Parche-Kawik, K. (2004). Das Mäntelchen im Wind? Zur Domänespezifität moralischen Urteilens. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 50, 244–265.
Beck, K., Dransfeld, A., Minnameier, G., & Wuttke, E. (2002). Autonomy in heterogeneity? Development of moral judgement behaviour during business education. In K. Beck (Ed.), Teaching-learning processes in vocational education: Foundations of modern training programmes (pp. 87–119). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Beck, K., Heinrichs, K., Minnameier, G., & Parche-Kawik, K. (1999). Homogeneity of moral judgement? Apprentices solving business conflicts. Journal of Moral Education, 28, 429–443.
Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210.
Blasi, A. (1995). Moral understanding and the moral personality: The process of moral integration. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 229–253). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Blasi, A. (2004). Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity (pp. 335–347). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bragues, G. (2005). Business is one thing, ethics is another: Revisiting Bernard Mandeville’s The Fable of the Bees. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 179–203.
Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180, 419–442.
Church, B., Gaa, J. C., Nainar, S. M. K., & Shehata, M. M. (2005). Experimental evidence relating to the person-situation interactionist model of ethical decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 363–383.
Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2011). Markets and morality. Cato Journal, 31, 1–25.
Clarke, J., & Holt, R. (2010). Reflective judgement: Understanding entrepreneurship as ethical practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 317–331.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment: Vol. I. Theoretical foundations and research validation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 477–496.
Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2008). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Forsythe, R. L., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15, 364–369.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity.
Frimer, J. A., & Walker, L. J. (2008). Towards a new paradigm of moral personhood. Journal of Moral Education, 37, 333–356.
Frimer, J. A., & Walker, L. J. (2009). Reconciling the self and morality: An empirical model of moral centrality development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1669–1681.
Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 149–163.
Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2005). A practical logic of cognitive systems: Vol. 2. The reach of abduction – Insight and trial. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gibbs, J. C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.
Hannafey, F. T. (2003). Entrepreneurship and ethics: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 99–110.
Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48, 232–256.
Harris, J. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis: A response to Joakim Sandberg. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 541–548.
Harris, J. D., Sapienza, H. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2009). Ethics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 407–418.
Hayek, F. A. V. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: Vol. 2. The mirage of social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Heinrichs, K., Minnameier, G., & Beck, K. (2014). Ethical and moral considerations on entrepreneurship education. In S. Weber, F. K. Oser, F. Achtenhagen, M. Fretschner & S. Trost (Eds.), Becoming an entrepreneur (pp. 197–215). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346–380.
Homann, K. (2002). Vorteile und Anreize. Tübingen: Mohr.
Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5–16.
Johns, G. (2001). In praise of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 31–42.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 52–73). New York: Wiley.
Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg’s model. Psychological Review, 112, 629–649.
Kutscha, G. (2008). Beruflichkeit als regulatives Prinzip flexibler Kompetenzentwicklung – Thesen aus berufsbildungstheoretischer Sicht. bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik – online, 14, 1–11.
Lapsley, D. K. (2006). Moral stage theory. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 37–66). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition: The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Berlin: Springer.
Maitland, I. (2002). The human face of self-interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 3–17.
Mankiw, N. G. (2011). Principles of microeconomics (6th ed.). Mason: South-Western.
Minnameier, G. (2000). Strukturgenese moralischen Denkens: Eine Rekonstruktion der Piagetschen Entwicklungslogik und ihre moraltheoretischen Folgen. Münster: Waxmann.
Minnameier, G. (2001). A new “stairway to moral heaven”? A systematic reconstruction of stages of moral thinking based on a Piagetian “logic” of cognitive development. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 317–337.
Minnameier, G. (2004a). Peirce-suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis, 60, 75–105.
Minnameier, G. (2004b). Ethics and economics, friends or foes? An educational debate. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 359–369.
Minnameier, G. (2005). Developmental progress in ancient Greek ethics. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 71–99.
Minnameier, G. (2008). Education for business ethics – Options and restrictions from a systematic point of view. In F. K. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved – Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp. 371–381). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Minnameier, G. (2009). Measuring moral progress: A neo-Kohlbergian approach and two case studies. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 131–143.
Minnameier, G. (2010a). Entwicklung moralischen Denkens aus einer neo-kohlbergschen Perspektive. In B. Latzko & T. Malti (Eds.), Moralentwicklung und – erziehung in Kindheit und Adoleszenz (pp. S. 47–67). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Minnameier, G. (2010b). The problem of moral motivation and the happy victimizer phenomenon – Killing two birds with one stone. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 129, 55–75.
Minnameier, G. (2010c). The logicality of abduction, deduction, and induction. In M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen, & H. Rydenfelt (Eds.), Ideas in action: Procedures of the applying Peirce conference (pp. 239–251). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.
Minnameier, G. (2011). Situationsspezifität moralischen Denkens und Handelns – Befunde, Erklärungen und didaktische Orientierungen. In O. Zlatikin-Troitschanskaia (Ed.), Stationen empirischer Bildungsforschung – Traditionslinien und Perspektiven (pp. 107–122). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Minnameier, G. (2013). Deontic and responsibility judgments: An inferential analysis. In K. Heinrichs, F. Oser & T. Lovat (Eds.), Handbook of moral motivation: What makes people act morally right? Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Minnameier, G., & Schmidt, S. (2013). Situational moral adjustment and the happy victimizer. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 253–268.
Nunner-Winkler, G. (2007). Development of moral motivation from childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 399–414.
Nunner-Winkler, G., & Sodian, B. (1988). Children’s understanding of moral emotions. Child Development, 59, 1323–1338.
Nyström, S. (2009). The dynamics of professional identity formation: Graduates transition from higher education to working life. Vocations and Learning, 2, 1–18.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375–413.
Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 536–547). New York: Macmillan.
Peirce, C. S. (1903/1934). Lectures on pragmatism. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 11–131). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rest, J. R. (1983). Morality. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.), J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 556–629). New York: Wiley.
Rest, J. R. (1984). The major components of morality. In W. M. Kurtinez & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 24–38). New York: Wiley.
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ross, W. T., Jr., & Robertson, D. C. (2000). Lying: The impact of decision context. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 409–440.
Sandberg, J. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 213–232.
Schminke, M., & Priesemuth, M. (2012). Behavioral business ethics: Taking context seriously. In D. De Cremer & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Shaping an emerging field (pp. 47–79). New York: Routledge.
Schurz, G. (2008). Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164, 201–324.
Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 513–540.
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision-making. Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.
Tomlinson, P. (1986). Kohlberg’s moral psychology: Any advance on the present stage? In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg – Consensus and controversy: Essay in honour of Lawrence Kohlberg (pp. 107–121). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.
Valentine, S., & Hollingworth, D. (2012). Moral intensity, issues importance, and ethical reasoning in operations situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 509–523.
Vanberg, V. J. (2001). The constitution of markets: Essays in political economy. London: Routledge.
Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: The need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business & Society, 35, 89–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minnameier, G. (2014). Moral Aspects of Professions and Professional Practice. In: Billett, S., Harteis, C., Gruber, H. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8901-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8902-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)