A Phenomenographic Way of Seeing and Developing Professional Learning
The growing interest in professional education has brought questions about how and where professional learning can best be developed. This chapter proposes a basis for developing professional learning, which adopts the view of learning from phenomenography. It is argued that professional learning can be conceptualized as a qualitative change of the learner in his or her way of experiencing or seeing the phenomenon or situation, which can be defined in terms of the critical aspects of the phenomenon or situation which the learner simultaneously focuses upon and discerns. It is also argued that by providing the learner with the opportunity to experience certain patterns of variation and invariance in the learning condition, he or she will be empowered to discern and focus on the critical aspects, which in turn improve his or her professional capabilities to handle novel situations.
This chapter first discusses how three major theories of learning, i.e. cognitivism, constructivism and situated cognition, conceptualize professional learning. It is followed by an explication of the phenomenographic way of seeing professional learning, with the highlight of the underpinning theory of learning, the variation theory. To exemplify how we attempt to foster professional learning among the learners, an empirical study which helps student teachers to develop professionally by forming a more sophisticated way of experiencing good teaching is reported. The chapter concludes by discussing implications of this view of learning for instructional practice within professional education.
KeywordsPhenomenography Variation theory Learning study Professional learning Student teachers
- Blomberg, G., Sherin, M. G., Renkl, A., Glogger, I., & Seidel, T. (2014). Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: Investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instructional Science, 42(3), 443–463. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6.
- Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1996). Stolen knowledge. In H. McLellen (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
- Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm shifts in designed instruction: From behaviourism to cognitivism to constructivism. Educational Technology, 33(5), 12–19.Google Scholar
- Erickson, G. (2000). Research programmes and the student science learning literature. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 271–292). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459–486). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1991). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment. In E. J. Gibson (Ed.), An odyssey in learning and perception (pp. 291–304). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Reprinted from: Psychological Review, pp. 32–41, 1955).Google Scholar
- Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Marton, F. (1999, August 24–28). Variatio est mater Studiorum. In Opening address delivered to the 8th European conference for Learning and Instruction, Goteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2013). Meanings are acquired from experiencing differences against a background of sameness, rather than from experiencing sameness against a background of difference: Putting a conjecture to the test by embedding it in a pedagogical tool. Frontier Learning Research, 1(1), 24–41.Google Scholar
- Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M., with Chik, P. M., Ko, P. Y., Lo, M. L., Mok I. A. C., Ng, F. P., Pang, M. F., Pong, W. Y., Runesson, U. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 850–873). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tobin, K. (Ed.). (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
- Treagust, D., Duit, R., & Fraser, B. (Eds.). (1996). Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
- Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study [Jugyokenjyu] in elementary school mathematics in Japan – A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar