The Management of Industrial Forest Plantations pp 3-26

Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 33) | Cite as

The Importance of Industrial Forest Plantations

  • Luiz C. E. Rodriguez
  • Maria Pasalodos-Tato
  • Luis Diaz-Balteiro
  • John Paul McTague
Chapter

Abstract

The first chapter of the book initially addresses the definition of planted forests, industrial forests and industrial forest plantations. It also contextualizes historically the evolution of the term forest plantations, citing the several international organizations involved and different attempts to satisfy many actors and opinions. Facts and figures are also presented to illustrate the evolving roles that forest plantations have undertaken over the years. Some comprehensive statistics are included to emphasize the importance and benefits of its expansion. The chapter also presents some important future trends that guide the need for the forest planning and forest management techniques discussed in the book. These tools may overcome the challenges brought by the more complex and conflicting social, economic and environmental goals confronted by the forest sector. Although regularly challenged by new technological advances, it is important to realize that trees are still one of the most efficient ways to produce highly demanded materials, with minimal collateral negative impacts. The argument stands in the principle that, being a renewable organism that synthesizes carbon fueled by sun light, the sustainable use of planted forests reduces the impact over other natural resources and fossil fuels. Furthermore, the antagonism between planted forests and natural forests has diminished, as well as its complementary and compatible coexistence with wild land native forests in many different landscapes and regional contexts.

Keywords

Industrial forests Forest economics Forests management 

References

  1. Barr CM, Sayer JA (2012) The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia-Pacific: critical issues for REDD+. Biol Conserv 154:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botkin D, Sedjo RA (1997) Using forest plantations to spare natural forests. Environment 39(10):14+. Academic OneFile. Web. 24 Aug 2013Google Scholar
  3. Boyle JM (1999) Planted forests: views and viewpoints. New Forests 17:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv 17:925–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruinsma J (2003) World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 – an FAO perspective. Earthscan, London, p 432Google Scholar
  6. Buongiorno J, Zhu S, Raunikar R, Prestemon JP (2012) Outlook to 2060 for world forest and forest industries: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report SRS-151Google Scholar
  7. Carle J, Holmgren P (2008) Wood from planted forests: a global outlook 2005–2030. Forest Prod J 58(12):6–18Google Scholar
  8. CIFOR (2002) Typology of planted forests. InfoBrief, Bogor, Indonesia. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Typology/John-typology.pdf
  9. Cossalter C, Pye-Smith C (2003) Fast-wood forestry – myths and realities. CIFOR – Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, 60 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans J (2004) Forest plantations. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist J (eds) Encyclopedia of forest sciences, vol 2. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 822–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans J, Turnbull JW (2004) Plantation forestry in the tropics: the role, silviculture, and use of planted forests for industrial, social, environmental, and agroforestry purposes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans J, Carle JB, Del Lungo A (2009) The question of definitions. In: Evans J (ed) Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability. CABI, Cambridge, p 213Google Scholar
  13. FAO (1967) World symposium on man-made forests and their industrial importance. Unasylva 21(86–87):116Google Scholar
  14. FAO (1981) Forest resources of tropical Africa, Tropical forest resources assessment project (in the framework of GEMS). Series forest resources of tropical Africa, tropical forest resources assessment project (in the framework of GEMS) Technical Report 2, UN 32/6.1301-78-04. FAO, Rome, Italy, 586 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (1982) Classification and definitions of forest products. FAO forestry paper 32. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, 258 pGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2002a) Second expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders. Proceedings. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO (2002b) World agriculture: towards 2015/2030: summary report. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (2005) Third expert meeting on harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders. Proceedings, Rome, 17–19 Jan 2005, 137 pGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (2006) Global forest resources assessment 2005: progress towards sustainable forest management (FRA 2005). FAO forestry paper 147, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010: main report. FAO forestry paper 163. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2012a) State of the world’s forests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 60 pGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (2012b) Global forest products facts and figures. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 17 pGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO (2013a) Statistical yearbook – world food and agriculture. FAO, Rome, 289 pGoogle Scholar
  24. FAO (2013b) FAO yearbook of forest products 2011, FAO forestry series 46//FAO statistics series 202. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, 358 pGoogle Scholar
  25. FAO (2014) FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization, Statistics Division online Database. Rome, Italy. http://faostat.fao.org
  26. FAO, JRC (2012) Global forest land-use change 1990–2005. In: Lindquist EJ, D’Annunzio R, Gerrand A, MacDicken K, Achard F, Beuchle R, Brink A, Eva HD, Mayaux P, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Stibig H-J (eds) FAO forestry paper no. 169. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and European Commission Joint Research Centre, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerber J-F (2011) Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: who, how and why? Glob Environ Chang 21(1):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helms JA, Prüller R, Haddon BD, Lund HG (2003) The need to say what you mean and mean what you say. IUFRO conference on information interoperability and organization for national and global forest information services, September 17–19, 2003. XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. http://www.iufro.org/download/file/318/184/archive-interoperability-full_doc
  29. ITTO (2012) Annual review and assessment of the world timber situation 2012. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, 196 pGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson R et al (2005) Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science 310:1944–1947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(9):3465–3472PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Overbeek W, Kröger M, Gerber J-F (2012) An overview of industrial tree plantation conflicts in the global South. Conflicts, trends, and resistance struggles. EJOLT Report No. 3, 100 pGoogle Scholar
  33. Paquette A, Messier C (2010) The role of plantations in managing the world’s forests in the Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ 8(1):27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sawyer J (1993) Plantations in the tropics: environmental concerns. IUCN Publications, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK in collaboration with UNEP and WWF, 83 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Sohngen B, Tennity C, Hnytka M, Meeusen K (2008) Global forestry data for the economic modeling of land use. GTAP working paper, no. 41Google Scholar
  36. van Dijk A, Keenan R (2007) Planted forests and water in perspective. For Ecol Manage 251(1–2):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Varmola M, Del Lungo A (2003) Working paper FP/25 Planted Forests Database (PFDB): structure and contentsGoogle Scholar
  38. Whiteman A (2014) Global trends and outlook for forest resources. In: Fenning T (ed) Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 163–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luiz C. E. Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Maria Pasalodos-Tato
    • 2
  • Luis Diaz-Balteiro
    • 3
  • John Paul McTague
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgrariaMadridSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Economía y Gestión Forestal, ETS Ingenieros de MontesTechnical University of MadridMadridSpain
  4. 4.Warnell School of ForestryUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations