Advertisement

Topological Interpretations of Provability Logic

  • Lev Beklemishev
  • David Gabelaia
Chapter
Part of the Outstanding Contributions to Logic book series (OCTR, volume 4)

Abstract

Provability logic concerns the study of modality \(\Box \) as provability in formal systems such as Peano Arithmetic. A natural, albeit quite surprising, topological interpretation of provability logic has been found in the 1970s by Harold Simmons and Leo Esakia. They have observed that the dual \(\Diamond \) modality, corresponding to consistency in the context of formal arithmetic, has all the basic properties of the topological derivative operator acting on a scattered space. The topic has become a long-term project for the Georgian school of logic led by Esakia, with occasional contributions from elsewhere. More recently, a new impetus came from the study of polymodal provability logic \(\mathbf {GLP}\) that was known to be Kripke incomplete and, in general, to have a more complicated behavior than its unimodal counterpart. Topological semantics provided a better alternative to Kripke models in the sense that \(\mathbf {GLP}\) was shown to be topologically complete. At the same time, new fascinating connections with set theory and large cardinals have emerged. We give a survey of the results on topological semantics of provability logic starting from first contributions by Esakia. However, a special emphasis is put on the recent work on topological models of polymodal provability logic. We also include a few results that have not been published so far, most notably the results of Sect. 10.4 (due to the second author) and Sects. 10.7, 10.8 (due to the first author).

Keywords

Provability logic Scattered spaces GLP Ordinal topologies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the referee for many useful comments, which helped to significantly improve the readability of the paper. Thanks are also due to Guram Bezhanishvili both for his detailed comments and his patience with the slow pace this chapter was taking. The first author was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), Russian Presidential Council for Support of Leading Scientific Schools, and the Swiss–Russian cooperation project STCP–CH–RU “Computational proof theory”. The second author was supported by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation grant #FR/489/5-105/11 and the French–Georgian grant CNRS–SRNSF #4135/05-01.

References

  1. 1.
    Abashidze M (1985) Ordinal completeness of the Gödel-Löb modal system. In: Intensional logics and the logical structure of theories. Metsniereba, Tbilisi, pp 49–73 (Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artemov S, Beklemishev L (2004) Provability logic. In: Gabbay D, Guenthner F (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic, vol 13, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 229–403Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagaria J (2012) Topologies on ordinals and the completeness of polymodal provability logic (in preparation)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagaria J, Magidor M, Sakai H (2012) Reflection and indescribability in the constructible universe. Manuscript, To appear in Israel Journal of MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beklemishev L, Gabelaia D (2013) Topological completeness of the provability logic glp. Ann Pure Appl Logic 128(12):1201–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beklemishev L (2004) Provability algebras and proof-theoretic ordinals, i. Ann Pure Appl Logic 128:103–123Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beklemishev L (2005) Reflection principles and provability algebras in formal arithmetic. Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk 60(2):3–78 (English trans: Russ Math Surv 60(2):197–268)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beklemishev L (2005) Veblen hierarchy in the context of provability algebras. In: Hájek P, Valdés-Villanueva L, Westerståhl D (eds) Proceedings of the 12th international congress on logic, methodology and philosophy of science. Kings College Publications, London, pp 65–78Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beklemishev L (2006) The Worm principle. In: Chatzidakis Z, Koepke P, Pohlers W (eds) Lecture notes in logic 27. Logic Colloquium ’02. AK Peters, pp 75–95Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beklemishev L (2009) On GLP-spaces. Manuscript. http://www.mi.ras.ru/~bekl/Papers/glp-sp.pdf
  11. 11.
    Beklemishev L (2010) Kripke semantics for provability logic glp. Ann Pure Appl Logic 161:756–774Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beklemishev L (2011) Ordinal completeness of bimodal provability logic GLB. In: Bezhanishvili N et al (ed) Logic, language and computation, TbiLLC 2009. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, number 6618, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beklemishev L (2011) A simplified proof of the arithmetical completeness theorem for the provability logic GLP. Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V.A.Steklova, 274(3):32–40 (English trans: Proc Steklov Inst Math 274(3):25–33)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beklemishev L, Bezhanishvili G, Icard T (2010) On topological models of GLP. In: Schindler R (ed) Ways of proof theory. Ontos Verlag, Heusendamm bei Frankfurt, Germany, pp 133–152Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beklemishev L, Joosten J, Vervoort M (2005) A finitary treatment of the closed fragment of japaridze’s provability logic. J Logic Comput 15(4):447–463Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bezhanishvili G, Esakia L, Gabelaia D (2005) Some results on modal axiomatization and definability for topological spaces. Studia Logica 81:325–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bezhanishvili G, Morandi P (2010) Scattered and hereditarily irresolvable spaces in modal logic. Archive for Mathematical Logic 49(3):343–365Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blass A (1990) Infinitary combinatorics and modal logic. J Symb Logic 55(2):761–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Block W, Pigozzi D (1989) Algebraizable logics. Memoirs of the AMS 77(396)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boolos G (1979) The unprovability of consistency: an essay in modal logic. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boolos G (1993) The analytical completeness of dzhaparidze’s polymodal logics. Ann Pure Appl Logic 61:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boolos G (1993) The logic of provability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carlucci L (2005) Worms, gaps and hydras. Math Logic Q 51(4):342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chagrov A, Zakharyaschev M (1997) Modal logic. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fernández-Duque D, Joosten J (2012) Kripke models of transfinite provability logic. Adv Modal Logic 9:185–199Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fernández-Duque D, Joosten J (2013) Models of transfinite provability logic. J Symb Logic 78(2):543–561Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fernández-Duque D, Joosten J (2012) Turing progressions and their well-orders. In: How the world computes. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 212–221Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Esakia L (1981) Diagonal constructions, löb’s formula and cantor’s scattered spaces. Studies in logic and semantics. Metsniereba, Tbilisi, pp 128–143 (Russian)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feferman S, Dawson J, Kleene S, Moore G, Solovay R, van Heijenoort J (eds) (1996) Kurt Gödel collected works, vol 1, Publications 1929–1936. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fernández-Duque D (2012) The polytopologies of transfinite provability logic. Preprint arXiv:1207.6595v2 [math.LO]
  31. 31.
    Font J, Jansana R, Pigozzi D (2003) A survey of abstract algebraic logic. Studia Logica 74(1–2):13–97Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foreman M, Kanamori A (eds) (2010) Handbook of set theory, vol 1–3. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gödel K (1933) Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalkuls. Ergebnisse Math. Kolloq., 4:39–40 (English trans: [29], pp 301–303)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gurevich Y (1985) Monadic second-order theories. In Barwise J, Feferman S (eds) Model-theoretical logics. Springer, Berlin, pp 479–506Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harrington L, Shelah S (1985) Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory. Notre Dame J Formal Logic 26:178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hilbert D, Bernays P (1968) Grundlagen der Mathematik, vols I and II, 2d edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Icard T, Joosten J (2012) Provability and interpretability logics with restricted realizations. Notre Dame J Formal Logic 53(2):133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Icard T III (2011) A topological study of the closed fragment of glp. J Logic Comput 21(4):683–696Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ignatiev K (1993) On strong provability predicates and the associated modal logics. J Symb Logic 58:249–290Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Japaridze G (1987) Modal-logical means of studying provability. PhD thesis, Moscow (Russian)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jech T (2002) Set theory: the third millenium edition. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kanamori A (2009) The higher infinite, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kudinov A, Shehtman V (2014) Derivational modal logics with the difference modality (this volume)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Löb M (1955) Solution of a problem of leon henkin. J Symb Logic 20:115–118Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Macintyre A, Simmons H (1973) Gödel’s diagonalization technique and related properties of theories. Colloq Math 28:165–180Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Magari R (1975) The diagonalizable algebras (the algebraization of the theories which express Theor.:II). Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana, Serie 4, 12, 1975. Suppl Fasc 3, 117–125Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Magidor M (1982) Reflecting stationary sets. J Symb Logic 47:755–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McKinsey J, Tarski A (1944) The algebra of topology. Ann Math 45:141–191Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mekler A, Shehlah S (1989) The consistency strength of “every stationary set reflects”. Israel J Math 67(3):353–366Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sargsyan G (2012) On the strength of PFA, I. http://tinyurl.com/bmknyyp
  51. 51.
    Segerberg K (1971) An essay in classical modal logic. Filosofiska Föreningen och Filosofiska Institutionen vid Uppsala Universitet, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Semadeni Z (1971) Banach spaces of continuous functions. In: Monografie matematyczne, Tom 55. PWN—Polish Scientific Publishers, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Simmons H (1975) Topological aspects of suitable theories. Proc Edinb Math Soc 2(19):383–391Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Smoryński C (1985) Self-reference and modal logic. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Solovay R (1976) Provability interpretations of modal logic. Israel J Math 28:33–71Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Steel J (2005) Pfa implies \(\text{ ad }^{l(\mathbb{r})}\). J Symb Logic 70(4):1255–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Steinsvold C (2007) Topological models of belief logics. PhD thesis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Visser A (1984) The provability logics of recursively enumerable theories extending Peano arithmetic at arbitrary theories extending Peano arithmetic. J Philos Logic 13:97–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.V.A. Steklov Mathematical Institute, RASMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow M.V. Lomonosov State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  4. 4.TSU Andrea Razmadze Mathematical InstituteTbilisiGeorgia
  5. 5.Free University of TbilisiTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations