A Probabilistic Method for Optimal Power Systems Planning with Wind Generators

Conference paper

Abstract

Radial Distribution Systems (RDS) connect a large number of renewable generators that are inherently uncertain. From being unidirectional power flow systems, RDS now enable bi-directional power flow. Depending upon availability of power from renewables, they receive or feed power to the connected transmission system. RDS optimal power flow (OPF), is an important tool in this new era for utilities, to minimize losses and operate efficiently. With large scale integration of wind generators to distribution systems, they must be appropriately represented using probabilistic models capturing their intermittent nature in these OPF algorithms. This paper proposes characterizing the solution of a Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow (P-OPF) for RDS using the Cumulant Method. This method makes it possible to linearly relate the probabilistic parameters of renewables at the optimal solution point to the state of the RDS. To assess the accuracy of the proposed P-OPF Cumulant Method, wind generators and system probabilistic data are incorporated in a 33-bus and 129-bus test system. The results are compared with those of Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). It is shown that the proposed method possesses high degree of accuracy, is significantly faster and more practical than an MCS approach.

Keywords

Cumulant method Optimal power flow Radial distribution systems Reactive power optimization Stochastic optimization Wind energy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial Support: This work was supported in part by the NSERC Discovery and Wind Energy Strategic Network grants to Bala Venkatesh.

References

  1. 1.
    J.A. Momoh, M.E. El-Hawary, R. Adapa, A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993 part I: non-linear and quadratic programming approaches. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 14(1), 96–104 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.R.C. Mamandur, R.D. Chenoweth, Optimal control of reactive power flow for improvements in voltage profiles and for real power loss minimization. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-100(7), 3185–3194 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.C. Tripathy, D. Prasad, O.P. Malik, G.S. Hope, Load flow solution for ill conditioned power systems by Newton like method. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 101, 3648–3657 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Ponnavsikko, K.S. Prakasa Rao, Optimal distribution systems planning. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-100(6), 2969–2977 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Vallee, J. Lobry, O. Deblecker, Impact of the wind geographical correlation level for reliability studies. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(4), 2232–2239 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Schilling, A.L. da Silva, R. Billinton, Bibliography on power system probabilistic analysis (1962–1988). IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 5(1), 1–11 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Vivian, G. Heydt, Stochastic energy dispatch. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 100(7), 3221–3227 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. El-Hawary, G. Mbamalu, A comparison of probabilistic perturbation and deterministic based optimal power flow solutions. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 6(3), 1099–1105 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Dadkhah, B. Venkatesh, Cumulant based stochastic reactive power planning method for distribution systems with wind generators. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27, 2351–2359 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Dukpa, B. Venkatesh, L. Chang, An accurate voltage solution method of radial distribution system. Can. J. Elect. Comput. Eng. 34(1/2), 69–74 (2009). (Win/Spr 2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Papoulis, S. Pillai, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 4th edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Schellenberg, W. Rosehart, J. Aguado, in Cumulant based probabilistic optimal power flow (P-OPF). Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, pp. 506–511, Sept 2004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Dadkhah, B. Venkatesh, in Probabilistic—optimal power flow for radial distribution systems with wind generators. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013, WCE 2013, London, U.K., pp. 1038–1043, 3–5 JulyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.O.G. Torres, V. Quintana, An interior-point method for nonlinear optimal power flow using voltage rectangular coordinates. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 13(4), 1211–1218 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Schellenberg, W. Rosehart, J. Aguado, Introduction to cumulant-based probabilistic optimal power flow (P-OPF). IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20(2), 1184–1186 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Zhang, S.T. Lee, Probabilistic load flow computation using the method of combined cumulants and Gram–Charlier expansion. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(1), 676–682 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. A. Kashem, V. Ganapathy, G. B. Jasmon, M. I. Buhari, in A novel method for loss minimization in distribution networks. International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Urban EnergyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations