Abstract
A structural indicator of a central driving committee for access of marginalised groups to higher education and lifelong learning at national and regional levels gives expression to a concern with sustainability and sufficient intensity of impact to overcome inertia for change to occur throughout system levels. A central driving committee at national level, specifically focused on lifelong learning and access to higher education, is with a view to facilitating a framework that would also embrace regional and local flexibility, rather than simply being a top-down imposition without dialogue.
Such a central driving committee with a social inclusion focus can also serve as a vital counterpoint to the danger of a purely outcomes and per capita funding-driven agenda. It is evident from the national reports that much work needs to be done in ensuring a systemic strategic approach is in place in relation to both access to higher education for socio-economically excluded groups and for lifelong learning. Many states that have strategies in these areas lack structures to ensure the implementation of such strategies. A further benefit of such committees to implement and review progress in this area is that they can provide reforms to existing strategies and clarification of funding strands while also developing European good practice in this area.
A common feature of interviews across institutions and national policy officials in Estonia, Bulgaria, Russia and Slovenia is that there exist neither criteria for establishing target groups for access to higher education initiatives based on poverty, low parental education or socio-economic background, nor a particular awareness of or willingness to seek such criteria. In Hungary and Lithuania, there is some focus on low income though this criterion appears relatively underdeveloped conceptually and also with regard to data collection for such a target group for access. From the perspective of access to education for groups experiencing socio-economic exclusion, there is some urgency in promoting regional dialogue across Central and Eastern European authorities and for educational institutions to agree on transparent criteria for socio-economic exclusion, beyond low income alone, in order to facilitate a more strategic approach to access to education for this group. The EU Commission can drive this process.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See also the PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) index of Economic, Social and Cultural Status (ESCS) which combines information on parents’ occupation and level of education with home possessions available to a student rather than a direct measurement of income.
- 2.
See also Leach (2013) on measures of socio-economic status (SES) in New Zealand being based on household income, occupation, household crowding, educational qualifications and income support, derived from their census data. However, Leach (2013) observes that in New Zealand ‘there is no measure of SES in higher education although a decile system is used in schools’ (p. 269).
References
Allaste, A. (2005). Nightlife and substance use in Tallinn. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 22, 139–141.
Balogh, A., Józan, A., Szöllősi, A., & Róbert, P. (2010). The institutional aspects of adult education in Hungary. Budapest: TARKI Social Research Centre. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Bamber, J. (2008, December 10–12). Foregrounding curriculum: Ditching deficit models of non-traditional students. ESREA annual conference. Access, learning careers and identities network, Seville.
Boyadjieva, P., Milenkova, V., Gornev, G., Petkova, K., & Nenkova, D. (2010). The role of Bulgarian educational institutions for the promotion of access of adults to formal education. Sofia: Institute of Sociology. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Clancy, P., & Goastellec, G. (2007). Exploring access and equity in higher education: Policy and performance in comparative perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 21(2), 136–154.
Commission Staff Working Document. {SEC(2009)1616}. Progress towards the Lisbon objectives in education and training. Indicators and benchmarks 2009.
Department of Education and Science. (2000). Learning for life: White paper on adult education. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Downes, P. (2003). Living with heroin: HIV, identity and social exclusion among the Russian-speaking minorities in Estonia and Latvia. English version. Tallinn: Legal Information Centre for Human Rights.
Downes, P., & Gilligan, A. L. (2007). Beyond disadvantage: Some conclusions. In P. Downes & A. L. Gilligan (Eds.), Beyond educational disadvantage (pp. 463–491). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Engel, L., Holford, J., & Mleczko, A. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal adult education. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
EUROSTUDENT. (2005). Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe. Hanover: Higher Education Information.
Feyerabend, P. (1988). Against method (2nd ed.). New York: Verso.
Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and time (J. MacQuarrie & E. Robinson, Trans., 1962). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ivančič, A., Mohorčič Špolar, V. A., & Radovan, M. (2010). The case of Slovenia. Access of adults to formal and non-formal education—Policies and priorities. Ljubljana: Slovenian Institute for Adult Education. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Kozlovskiy, V., Khokhlova, A., & Veits, M. (2010). The role of Russian educational institutions in the promotion of access for adults to formal education. St Petersburg: Department of Sociology, Saint Petersburg State University. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Lather, P. (1994). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research. London: Routledge.
Leach, L. (2013). Participation and equity in higher education: Are we going back to the future? Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 267–286.
Maunsell, C., Downes, P., & McLoughlin, V. (2008). National report on lifelong learning in Ireland. LLL2010: Sub-project 1: Towards a lifelong learning society in Europe—The contribution of the education system. Dublin: Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College.
May, S., Modood, T., & Squires, J. (2004). Ethnicity, nationalism, and minority rights: Charting the disciplinary debates. In S. May, T. Modood, & J. Squires (Eds.), Ethnicity, nationalism, and minority rights (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mikecz, R. (2008). The economies of Estonia and Latvia—Fast growing eeconomies with increasing income inequalities. In P. Downes, A. Zule-Lapimaa, L. Ivanchenko, & S. Blumberg (Eds.), Not one victim more: Human trafficking in the Baltic States (pp. 211–231). Tallinn: Living for Tomorrow.
Morrison, T. (1993). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. New York: Vintage.
Rammel, S., & Gottwald, R. (2010). Social inclusion in formal and non formal adult education: Findings from Austrian institutions and government representatives. Krems: Danube University. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorisation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorisation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sayer, A. (1997). Essentialism, social constructionism and beyond. The Sociological Review, 45(3), 453–487.
Spring, N. (2007). Tracing the language of educational disadvantage. In P. Downes & A. L. Gilligan (Eds.), Beyond educational disadvantage (pp. 3–10). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Stensen, O.-A., & Ure, O.-B. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal education in Norway. Oslo: Fafo—Institute for Labour and Social Research. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic.
Taljunaite, M., Labanauskas, L., Terepaite-Butviliene, J., & Blazeviviene, L. (2010). The access of adults to formal and non-formal adult education. Vilnius: Lithuanian Social Research Centre, Social Research Institute. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Tamm, A., & Saar, E. (2010). LLL2010 subproject 5 Estonia country report. Tallinn: Institute of International and Social Studies/Department of Social Stratification, University of Tallinn. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Tribe, L. H. (1988). American constitutional law (2nd ed.). New York: Foundation Press.
Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2010). School ethnic composition and aspirations of immigrant students in Belgium. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 209–237.
Weedon, E., Riddell, S., Purves, R., & Ahlgren, L. (2010). Social inclusion and adult participation in lifelong learning: Officials’, managers’ and teachers’ perspectives. Edinburgh: University of Scotland. National report for comparative report of Subproject 5 of LLL2010, Educational Disadvantage Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Downes, P. (2014). Access to Higher Education for Socio-economically Marginalised Groups: Indicators at Macro-Exo Levels. In: Access to Education in Europe. Lifelong Learning Book Series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8795-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8795-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8794-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8795-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)