Abstract
A fundamental task of the ship designer is to develop the best possible hull form on the basis of certain known (preliminarily determined) dimensions and integrated hull form characteristics, such as ship’s length L, beam B, draft T and hull form coefficients, slenderness ratio, etc., considering the following fundamental factors/criteria:
-
a.
Resistance and Propulsion in Calm Water
Particular attention should be paid to:
-
Superposition/tuning of the generated transverse, ship-bound wave systems, namely of the bow, the stern, and the shoulder wave systems (see Sect. 2.3.1).
-
Favorable/smooth flow around stern shoulders and avoidance of flow separation (causing increased eddy resistance).
-
Favorable/smooth incident flow to the propeller and rudder.
-
Comment: Besides ship’s hull form, the resistance of a ship is significantly influenced , by ship’s main dimensions L, B, and T, her displacement and its distribution, as well as the mutual relationships thereof (ratios of main dimensions, slenderness ratio). Therefore, possible mistakes in choosing the proper values for the above dimensions cannot be corrected even with very careful shaping of the vessel’s hull.
-
b.
Stability/Floatability in Intact and Damage Condition: Is strongly influenced by the form of the waterplane area (CWP), the form of sections below and above still water level (SWL), the type of the stern, etc.
-
c.
Seakeeping Performance/Behavior in Waves:
Particularly with regard to:
-
Ship motions and loads in waves
-
Slamming phenomena and emergence of propeller (propeller racing)
-
Added resistance in waves
-
Roll motions and dynamic stability, likely capsize/foundering in waves
-
Bow diving and deck wetness phenomena (green water) by high waves
The above listed phenomena are affected in addition to the main dimensions, particularly by:
-
Displacement (total ship’s weight and its distribution)
-
Coefficients CB and CP
-
Longitudinal center of floatation (LCF)
-
Sections’ form character above design waterline (particularly at the bow) and freeboard/bow height
-
Bow/stern form
-
-
d.
Maneuvering Capabilities:
Concerning in particular the following ship properties:
-
Course keeping
-
Maneuverability
Influenced by:
-
Lateral plane projected area of ship’s hull below waterline (value of a · L · T and centroid of this area).
-
-
e.
Volume of Holds/Cargo:
It is referring to:
-
Dimensions of holds’ spaces
-
Position of holds’ openings/hatches
-
Available volume of holds
It is affected particularly by:
-
Coefficients CB, CBD (CB at the level of D), and CM
-
Length of parallel body
-
Sections’ form/character
-
-
f.
Construction Aspects and Cost:
Is relating to:
-
Simplicity and ease of construction
-
Construction cost
and is influenced basically by the same factors as stated above for the volume of holds (see (e)).
In the framework of development of a ship’s hull form the determination of the following quantities is additionally required:
-
Longitudinal position of the buoyancy center and the center of floatation
-
Vertical position of buoyancy center
-
Length of vessel’s parallel body
-
Length of entrance/run and angle of entrance/run (slope) of sectional area curve.
In the same context the following qualitative characteristics of the vessel’s hull are determined:
-
Distribution of displacement, form of sectional area curve, and shape/profile of shoulders
-
Character and form of sections of wetted and above waterline hull form
-
Character and form of the design waterline (DWL) and waterlines around DWL
-
Shape of the bow part of the vessel
-
Shape of the stern part of the vessel
-
Configuration of deck’s sheer and determination of freeboard height
-
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Georg Weinblum (1897-1974): Renowned German hydrodynamicist and former professor of ship theory at the University of Hamburg; before becoming professor in Hamburg after WWII he worked as researcher at the DTMB in Washington D.C; his main contributions are in the theory of ship’s wave resistance and its relationship to ship’s hull form, what has been considered as a first approach to modern numerical hull form optimization methods.
- 2.
The diagram is of historical value and is believed to have been developed after WWII. Source of information are the lectures of Prof. E. Strohbusch on ship design (1971).
- 3.
Of course, there are further effects on actual flow velocity to the propellers (and ship’s wake), like free-surface effects due to the action of the ship-bound and the incoming sea waves and local hull form effects.
- 4.
Nevertheless, dynamic stability problems have surfaced in recent time also with the operation of larger ships, e.g., containerships.
- 5.
The most prominent, recent large ship accident related to parametric roll happened in October 2008 with the 4,832 TEU containership APL China on the way from Taiwan to Seattle; during her trip the ship experienced parametric roll resonance and barely survived foundering; when she arrived in Seattle it was realized that more than sixty percent of her cargo was lost at sea or damaged. The following multi-million USD liability case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. Thanks to the conduct forensic studies that attributed the disaster to parametric roll, the liability of the operator APL (American President Lines) was limited to reasonable levels.
- 6.
Of course, bulb/piston type bows (without transverse expansion) were found in the antique Greek “triremes” and were used for ramming enemy ships; they were applied to naval ships until the beginning of the twentieth century.
References
Dudszus A, Danckwardt E (1982) Schifftechnik—Einführung and Grundbergriffe (in German). VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin
Eckert E, Sharma S (1970) Bulbous Bows for slow, full type ships (in German),Trans. Schiffbautechnische Gesellschaft (STG)
Friis AM, Andersen P, Jensen JJ (2002) Ship design (Part I & II). Section of Maritime Engineering, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark. ISBN 87-89502-56–6
Guldhammer HE, Harvald SA(1974) Ship resistance: Effect of form and principal dimensions. Academisk Forlag, Copenhagen
Kerlen H (1971) Design of Bulbous Bows for full Ships from the practical point of view, Journal HANSA, p. 1031
Kracht A (1978) Design of Bulbous Bows. SNAME Trans 86:197–217
Lewis EV (ed) (1988) Principles of naval architecture, vol. I–III. SNAME Publication, New York (revision of the book: Comstock DP (ed) (1967) Principles of naval architecture. SNAME Publ., New York)
Papanikolaou A (2009) Ship design—methodologies of preliminary ship design, Vol. 1 (in Greek: Μελέτη Πλοίου—Μεθοδολογίες Προμελέτης Πλοίου). SYMEON, Athens. ISBN 978-960-9600-09-01 & Vol. 2, ISBN 978-969-9400-11-4, October 2009
Spanos D, Papanikolaou A (2006) Numerical simulation of parametric roll in head seas. Proc. 9th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 2006
Schneekluth Η (1985) Ship design (in German). Koehler, Herford
Strohbusch E (1971) Entwerfen von Schiffen I–IV. Lecture notes (in German). Technical University, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Papanikolaou, A. (2014). Ship’s Hull Form. In: Ship Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8751-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8751-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8750-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8751-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)