Economic Decision Making: Application of the Theory of Complex Systems

Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

In this chapter the complex systems are discussed in the context of economic and business policy and decision making. It will be showed and motivated that social systems are typically chaotic, non-linear and/or non-equilibrium and therefore complex systems. It is discussed that the rapid change in global consumer behaviour is underway, that further increases the complexity in business and management. For policy making under complexity, following principles are offered: openness and international competition, tolerance and variety of ideas, self-reliability and low dependence on external help. The chapter contains four applications that build on the theoretical motivation of complexity in social systems. The first application demonstrates that small economies have good prospects to gain from the global processes underway, if they can demonstrate production flexibility, reliable business ethics and good risk management. The second application elaborates on and discusses the opportunities and challenges in decision making under complexity from macro and micro economic perspective. In this environment, the challenges for corporate management are being also permanently changed: the balance between short term noise and long term chaos whose attractor includes customers, shareholders and employees must be found. The emergence of chaos in economic relationships is demonstrated by a simple system of differential equations that relate the stakeholders described above. The chapter concludes with two financial applications: about debt and risk management. The non-equilibrium economic establishment leads to additional problems by using excessive borrowing; unexpected downturns in economy can more easily kill companies. Finally, the demand for quantitative improvements in risk management is postulated. Development of the financial markets has triggered non-linearity to spike in prices of various production articles such as agricultural and other commodities that has added market risk management to the business model of many companies.

Keywords

Decision making Complexity of social systems Risk management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This contribution was written in the 2nd Ph.D. School of “Mathematical modelling of complex systems” in Pescara, Italy in July 2012. Author would like to thank all of the attending students and professors for fruitful discussion; and especially Professors. G.I. Bischi and T. Bountis. Author would also like to thank Prof. J. Engelbrecht and Dr J. Kalda from Institute of Cybernetics at Tallinn University of Technology for fruitful discussions. The support of Estonian Science Foundation (Grant ETF7909) supported by the EU through the European Regional Development Fund is highly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–97.ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ball, P. (2004). Critical mass. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bischi, G. I., & Kopel, M. (2001). Equilibrium selection in a nonlinear duopoly game with adaptive expectations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46, 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldarelli, G., Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Pietronero, L., Scala, A., & Tacchella, A. (2012). A network analysis of countries’ export flows: Firm grounds for the building blocks of the economy. Available via arxiv.org, http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2590. Cited 25 Dec 2012.
  6. 6.
    Chan Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdős, P., & Renyi, A. (1959). On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae (Debrecen), 6, 290–297.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ford, H. Quoted in Wikiquote.org, http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Henry_Ford. Cited 18 Jan 2013.
  9. 9.
    Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge. (Reprinted by Routledge 2009).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kitt, R. (2005). Generalised scale-invariance in financial time series. Doctoral thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandelbrot, B. B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. The Journal of Business, 36, 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mandelbrot, B. B. (1965). Une classe de processus stochastiques homothetiques a soi; application a la loi climatologique de H.E. Hurst. Comptes Rendus (Paris), 260, 3274–3277.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mandelbrot, B. B. (1997). Fractals and scaling in finance: Discontinuity, concentration, risk. New York: Springer.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mantegna, R., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). An introduction to econophysics: Correlations and complexity in finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller, J., & Page, S. (2007). Complex adaptive systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A guided tour. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moskowitz, H., & Gofman, A. (2007). Selling blue elephants: How to make great products that people want before they even know that they want them. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing/Pearson.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pareto, V. (1896–1897). Cours d’Economie Politique. Lausanne: F. Rogue.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peters, T., & Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row. (Reprinted by Profile books, UK, 2004).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Popper, K. (1934). Logik der Forschung. London: Routledge. (First published in English in 1959: The logic of scientific discovery).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Popper, K. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Reprinted by Routledge in 2005).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Popper, K. (1957). The powerty of historicism. London: Routledge. (Reprinted by Routledge 2010).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Porter, M. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Boston: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puu, T. (1989). Nonlinear economic dynamics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; see also Puu, T., & Panchuk, A. (Eds.). (2011). Nonlinear economic dynamics. New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ricardo, D. (1817). Principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray. Retrieved January 02, 2013, via Google Books.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rowland, I. (2008). The full facts book of cold reading (4th ed.). London: Ian Rowland Limited.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stanley, H. E., Plerou, V., & Gabaix, X. (2008). A statistical physics view of financial fluctuations: Evidence for scaling and universality. Physica A, 387, 3967–3981.ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taleb, N. N. (2005). Fooled by randomness: The hidden role of chance in life and in the markets (2nd ed.). London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The Economist. (2012). A third industrial revolution, editorial in April 21st 2012 issue. http://www.economist.com/node/21552901. Cited 25 Dec 2012.
  32. 32.
    Zipf, H. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Institute of CyberneticsTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.Swedbank ASTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations