Counter-Intelligence as a Chaotic Phenomenon and Its Importance in National Security

  • Gökhan Kuloğlu
  • Zakir Gül
  • Şefika Şule Erçetin
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

In today’s rapidly changing globalized world, remarkably fast and important developments have been faced in the area of national security as in almost all other areas. Advancements in communication and transportation technologies have removed physical boundaries almost completely. National security institutions now have to fight against new and complicated security threats that go beyond the boundaries such as organized crimes and terror crimes. These ever-changing threats and dangerous environment which become more and more complex every single day force nations to review their current security structures and to take new and effective measures in the required areas in order to ensure their national security. As a matter of fact, counter-intelligence, which was quite important due to the frequency of spying acts during the Cold War but lost its importance after the Cold War had ended, has been one of these measures. Today, counterintelligence has once again become one of the most important functions in the fight against national security threats with changing dimensions. It is only possible for a nation to ensure its national security fully by having not only a defensive and passive approach but also offensive counter-intelligence.

Keywords

Security National security Intelligence Counterintelligence 

References

  1. 1.
    Arends, J. F. M. (2009). Homeros’dan Hobbes ve Ötesine: “Güvenlik” Kavramının Avrupa Geleneğindeki Boyutları. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6(22), 3–33.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, S. A. (1994). Should spies be cops? Foreign Policy, 97, 37.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bal, M. A. (2003). Modern Devlet ve Güvenlik (1st ed.). İstanbul: IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Best Richard, A. (2004). Proposals for intelligence reorganization, 1949–2004. USA: Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL32500.pdf. Erişim tarihi 10 May 2013.
  5. 5.
    Cerrah, İ. (2011). Demokratik Toplumlarda İç Güvenlik (1st ed.). Ankara: Polis Akademisi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, J. R. (2007). Intelligence and national security: A reference handbook. Westport: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahl, E. J. (2009). Intelligence and terrorism. Conference papers, International Studies Association, Annual Meeting, USA, Chart.1, pp.1–41.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daugherty, W. J. (2004). Executive secrets, covert action & the presidency. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucy.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2012). http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/intelligence/defined. Downloaded on 07 May 2012.
  10. 10.
    Fidan, H. (1999). Intelligence and foreign policy: A comparison of British, American and Turkish intelligence systems. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Godson, R. (2004). Dirty tricks or trump cards: U.S. covert action and counterintelligence (3rd ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hermann, C. F. (1982). In J. F. Reichart & S. R. Sturm (Eds.), American defense policy (pp. 18–21). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hulnick, A. S. (1996). United States covert action: Does it have a future? International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 9(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jervis, R. (2009). Intelligence, counterintelligence, perception and deception. In J. E. Sims & B. Gerber (Eds.), Vaults, mirrors & masks, rediscovering U.S. counterintelligence. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, L. K. (2007). Strategic intelligence: Counterintelligence and counterterrorism: Defending the nation against hostile forces (Intelligence and the quest for security, Vol. 4). Westport: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kapani, M. (1989). Politika Bilimine Giriş. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 5. Basım.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowenthal, M. M. (2006). Intelligence: From secrets to policy (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McNamara, F. (1985). U.S. counterintelligence today. Washington, DC: The Nathan Hale Institute.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moravej, K., & Diaz, G. (2007). Critical issues in contemporary counter intelligence (Discussion Papers, No:13). Spain: The Research Unit on International Security and Cooperation (UNISCI).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mueller, K. P., Castillo, J. J., Morgan, F. E., & Pegahi, N. (2006). Striking first, preemptive and preventive attack in U.S. national security policy. Santa Monica: RAND Cooperation. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG403.df. Downloaded on 10 May 2013.
  22. 22.
    Prunckun, H. (2012). Counterintelligence theory and practice (1st ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sarkesian, S. C., Williams, J. A., & Cimbala, S. J. (2008). US national security: Policymakers, processes & politics (4th ed.). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shulsky, A. N., & Schmitt, G. (2002). Silent warfare: Understanding the world of intelligence (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Potomac Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shumate, S., & Borum, R. (2006). Psychological support to defense counterintelligence operations. USA: Military Psychology, 18(4), 283–296. http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=randy_borum&seiredir=1&referer=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fscholar.google.com.tr\%2Fscholar\%3Fhl\%3Dtr\%26q\%3DCounterintelligence\%2B\%2526\%2BOperational\%2BSecurity\%26btnG\%3D\%26lr\%3D. Downloaded on 10 Mar 2013.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    US Department of Defense. (1995). Report of the Advisory Board on the Investigative Capability in the Department of Defense (Vol. I, pp. 67–75).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    US Executive Order 12333. (1981). United States intelligence activities (As amended by Executive Orders 13284 (2003), 13355 (2004) and 13470 (2008)). http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo12333-2008.pdf. Downloaded on 9 May 2013.
  28. 28.
    US Office of Counterintelligence (DXC), Defense CI & HUMINT Center, Defense Intelligence Agency. (2011). Terms & definitions of interest for DoD counterintelligence proffesionals. http://www.ncix.gov/publications/ci_references/docs/CI_Glossary.pdf. Downloaded on 15 Apr 2013.
  29. 29.
    US Office of The National Counterintelligence Executive (ONCIX). (2004). CI reader: An American revolution into the new millennium (Vol. II). http://www.ncix.gov/publications/ci_references/docs/CI_Reader_Vol2.pdf
  30. 30.
    US Office of The National Counterintelligence Executive (ONCIX). (2004). CI reader: An American revolution into the new millenium (Vol. III). http://www.ncix.gov/publications/ci_references/docs/CI_Reader_Vol3.pdf
  31. 31.
    US Senate Report No. 94–755. (1976). Foreign and military intelligence, Book I, Final report of the select committee to study governmental operations with respect the intelligence activities United States senate together with additional, supplemental, and separate views. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Cleave, M. K. (2007). Counterintelligence and national strategy. Washington, DC: School for National Security Executive Education National Defense University (NDU) Press. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA471485. Downloaded on 07 May 2013.
  33. 33.
    Weber, M. (l993). Sosyoloji Yazıları (T. Parla, Çev., 3rd Baskı). İstanbul: Hürriyet Vakfı Yayınları.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gökhan Kuloğlu
    • 1
  • Zakir Gül
    • 1
  • Şefika Şule Erçetin
    • 2
  1. 1.Security Sciences InstituteTurkish National Police AcademyAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Hacettepe University and International Science AssociationAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations