Skip to main content

New Communitarianism Movements and Complex Utopia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chaos Theory in Politics

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

Simulation is a rapidly growing field in social sciences. Simulation theories in social sciences are considered to critique social dynamics and societies which are mostly simulated by media, cinema, TV, internet, etc. Recently we (Akdeniz KG, Disorder in complex human system. In: Fritzsch H, Phua KK (eds) Singapore: proceedings of the conference in Honour of Murray Gell-Mann’s 80th birthday quantum mechanics, elementary particles, quantum cosmology and complexity. World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, pp 630–637, 2009) purposed a simulation theory as a critique theory to investigate disordered human behaviors. In this theory, “Disorder-Sensitive Human Behaviors (DSHB) Simulation Theory”, chaotic awareness is also considered as a reality principle in simulation world to complete Baudrillard Simulation Theory (Baudrillard J, Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press, Michigan, 1995). We call the emergence of this reality as zuhur which is different than simulacra. More recently we proposed the complex utopia (Akdeniz KG, From Simulacra to Zuhur in Complex Utopia. 11th International Conference of the Utopian Studies Society, Lublin, 2010; Akdeniz KG, The new identities of the physicist: cyborg-physicist and post-physicist. In: Proceedings of the conference of world international conference of technology and education, Beirut, 2010) to critique the complex societies and communities in simulation world. The challenging agents in the complex utopia are both simulacra and zuhur. In this paper we would like to review “What is the complex utopia?” And we shall critique some global events in framework of complex utopia with particular examples in socio-economic and political contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bölücük, C. A. (2014). Understanding Arab Spring with chaos theory: Uprising or revolution. In S. Banerjee, Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & A. Tekin (Eds.), Chaos theory in politics. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akdeniz, K. G. (2007). Post-physicist manifesto. Istanbul University Sociology Journal, 3, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akdeniz, K. G. (2009). Disorder in complex human system. In H. Fritzsch & K. K. Phua (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference in Honour of Murray Gell-Mann’s 80th birthday quantum mechanics, elementary particles, quantum cosmology and complexity (pp. 630–637). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akdeniz, K. G. (2010). From Simulacra to Zuhur in Complex Utopia. In 11th international conference of the Utopian Studies Society, Lublin.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Akdeniz, K. G. (2010). The new identities of the physicist: Cyborg-physicist and post-physicist. In Proceedings of the conference of world international conference of technology and education, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akdeniz, K. G. (2011). The possible new identities in science and philosophy. In F. Seroglou, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international & 6th Greek history, philosophy and science teaching joint conference (pp. 34–38). Thessaloniki: Epikentro.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Akdeniz, K. G. (2012). Heterodoxy and Complex Utopia. In 13th international conference of the Utopian Studies Society, Tarragona.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Akdeniz, K. G. (2012). Is Arab Spring a Complex Utopia? In International Science Association, 2012 international chaos, complexity and leadership symposium, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anastasopoulos, N. (2012). The rise of communitarianism and other alternative movements from the Athenian cries. In 13th international conference of the Utopian Studies Society, Tarragona.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, N. (2007). Simply complexity. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sargent, L. T. (2010). Retheorizing Utopia/Utopianism in 21st century. In Keynote lectures in 11th international conference of the Utopian Studies Society, Lublin.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Dr. Nicholas Anastasopoulos for fruitful Tarragona conversation on communitarianism in Greece. And thanks to Prof. Dr. Ş. Şule Erçetin, for her motivation me to prepare this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Gediz Akdeniz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akdeniz, K.G. (2014). New Communitarianism Movements and Complex Utopia. In: Banerjee, S., Erçetin, Ş., Tekin, A. (eds) Chaos Theory in Politics. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8691-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8691-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8690-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8691-1

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics