Advertisement

Improving Gender Responsiveness of Agricultural Extension

  • Catherine Ragasa

Abstract

This chapter makes the case for improving the gender-responsiveness of agricultural extension systems through consideration of (1) whether the gender of the extension agent affects the effectiveness of extension services; (2) whether both men and women receive extension advice; and (3) how extension services are delivered. As part of this, the author looks at issues surrounding quality and emphasis of extension services. The author then reviews the evidence on gender differences in access to formal extension agent visits and to other sources of extension information, and the factors that lead to women having lower access to extension services. At this point, the chapter examines the experience of programs and projects that aim to increase women’s access to extension, with more detailed analysis of extension system reforms in India (ATMA model), Uganda (NAADS), Venezuela (privatization and decentralization), and Ethiopia (sectoral policies). Subsequently, the chapter reviews innovative literature on the use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in extension. The concluding section examines lessons learned and key messages.

Keywords

Gender Agricultural extension services Rural advisory services Information and communication technologies (ICTs) Extension agents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter draws from the discussion on extension in Meinzen-Dick et al. (2010).

References

  1. Akeredolu M (2009) Female students’ participation in the University Mid-Career Agricultural Extension Training Programme in West Africa: constraints and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the association for international agricultural and extension education (AIAEE) at the InterContinental San Juan Resort in Puerto Rico, 24–27 May 2009Google Scholar
  2. Alston JM, Wyatt TJ, Pardey PG, Marra MC, Chan-Kang C (2000) A meta-analysis of rates of return to agricultural R&D—Ex Pede Herculem. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Awoyemi TT, Oluwatayo IB (2010) Gender mainstreaming of ICT projects: lessons from rural South West Nigeria. Libyan Agric Res Center J Int 1(2):65–69Google Scholar
  4. Balasubramanian K, Thamizoli P, Umar A, Kanwar A (2010) Using mobile phones to enable lifelong learning among rural women in southern India. Distance Educ 31(2):193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates A, Tony W (2000) Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Birner R, Davis K, Pender J, Nkonya E, Anandajayasekeram P, Ekboir J, Mbabu A, Spielman D, Horna D, Benin S, Cohen M (2006) From “best practice” to “best fit”: a framework for analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide. Development strategy and governance division discussion paper 37. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun A, Jiggins J, Röling N, van den Berg H, Snijders P (2006) A global survey and review of farmer field school experiences. Report prepared for the International Livestock Research Institute. Final Report, June 12. Available at http://www.share4dev.info/kb/documents/1880.pdf
  8. Bukenya C (2010) Meeting farmers demand? An assessment of extension reform in Uganda. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, the Netherlands. Available at http://edepot.wur.nl/15663
  9. CEEWA (Council for Economic Empowerment of Women of Africa, Uganda) (n.d.) Women should be the driving force in NAADPS program. http://www.ceewauganda.org/. Accessed 3 Feb 2010
  10. Davis K (2006) Farmer field schools: a boon or bust for extension in Africa? J Int Agric Ext Educ 13(1):91–97Google Scholar
  11. Davis K, Negash M (2007) Gender, wealth, and participation in community groups in Meru Central District, Kenya. CAPRi working paper series 65. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis K, Nkonya E, Kato E, Ayalew Mekonnen D, Odendo M, Miiro R, Nkuba J (2010) Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa. IFPRI discussion paper 00992. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Driciru C (2008) Women participation in national agricultural advisory services in Uganda: a case study of Vurra Sub-County, Arua District, 2001—2007. Unpublished master’s degree thesis, Public Administration and Management, Makerere University, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  14. Due JF, Magayane AA, Temu A (1997) Gender again: views of female agricultural extension officers by smallholder farmers in Tanzania. World Dev 25(5):713–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evenson R (1997) The economic contributions of agricultural extension to agricultural and rural development. In: Swanson B, Bentz R, Sofranko A (eds) Improving agricultural extension: a reference manual. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 27–36Google Scholar
  16. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2003) Gender: key to sustainability and food security. Gender and Development, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Feder G, Anderson JR, Birner R, Deininger K (2010) Promises and realities of community-based agricultural extension. IFPRI discussion paper 959. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. GenARDIS (2010) Small grants that make big changes for women in agriculture. Association for Progressive Communications, MelvilleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert RA, Sakala WD, Benson TD (2002) Gender analysis of a nationwide cropping system trial survey in Malawi. Afr Stud Q 6(1 & 2):223–243. http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v6/v6i1a9.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2010
  20. Giles L (2004) ICT to reduce gender disparity in education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Capstone project: master of distant education. University of Maryland, University College, College Park, MD, USGoogle Scholar
  21. Gillwald A, Milek A, Stork C (2010) Gender assessment of ICT access and usage in Africa, vol 1, Policy paper 5. Research ICT Africa, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  22. Gotschi E, Njuki J, Delve R (2009) Equal numbers, equal chances? A case study of gender differences in the distribution of social capital in smallholder farmer groups in Búzi District, Mozambique. Eur J Dev Res 21(2):264–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grameen Phone (2005) Annual report. Retrieved from http://investor-relations.grameenphone.com/irportal/annualreport/gp_ar_05.pdf
  24. Hafkin NJ, Odame HH (2002) Gender, ICTs, and agriculture. Situation analysis for the 5th consultative expert meeting of the technical centre for agricultural and rural cooperation’s (CTA) ICT observatory meeting on Gender and Agriculture in the Information Society, Sageningen, The Netherlands, 11–13 September 2002Google Scholar
  25. Huyer S, Hafkin N, Ertl H, Dryburgh H (2005) Women in the information society. In: Sciadas G (ed) From the digital divide to digital opportunities: measuring infostates for development. Orbicom/ITU, Ottawa, pp 135–195Google Scholar
  26. Isubikalu P (2007) Stepping-stones to improve upon functioning of participatory agricultural extension programmes: farmer field schools in Uganda. PhD dissertation, Wageningen University, Netherlands. Available at http://edepot.wur.nl/42679
  27. Jensen R (2007) The digital provide: information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector. Q J Econ 122(3):879–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katungi E, Edmeades S, Smale M (2008) Gender, social capital, and information exchange in rural Uganda. J Int Dev 20(1):35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kwapong OATF (2009) A comparison of ICT knowledge and usage among female distance learners in endowed and deprived communities in developing countries. E-Learn Digit Media 6(2):164–174Google Scholar
  30. Maskow M (2000) Radio as a learning technology. In: Burge EJ (ed) New directions for adult and continuing education: the strategic use of learning technologies. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 59–68Google Scholar
  31. Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A, Behrman J, Biermayr-Jenzano P, Wilde V, Noordeloos M, Ragasa C, Beintema N (2010) Engendering agricultural research. Discussion paper 00973. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore KM, Hamilton S, Sarr P, Thiongane S (2001) Access to technical information and gendered NRM practices: men and women in rural Senegal. Agric Hum Values 18(1):95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NAADS (National Agricultural Advisory Services) Secretariat) (2004) NAADS poverty and gender fact sheet No. 6 (June). http://www.naads.or.ug/
  34. Parkinson S (2008) Learning participation in rural development: a study of Uganda’s national agricultural advisory services. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Guelph, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  35. Planning Commission (India) (2007) Report. Report of sub-group on gender and agriculture submitted to the working group on gender issues, Panchayat Raj Institutions, Public Private Partnership, Innovative Finance and Micro Finance in Agriculture for the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007–2012). New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  36. Plant S (2003) On the mobile: the effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. http://www.motorola.com/mot/doc/0/234_MotDoc.pdf
  37. Quizon J, Feder G, Murgai R (2001) Fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: the case of the farmer field school approach. Working paper. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Rivera W, Alex G (eds) (2004) Privatization of extension systems: case studies of international initiatives. Volume 2. Agriculture and rural development discussion paper 9. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Sorensen K (2002) Love, duty and the S-curve: an overview of some current literature on gender and ICT. SIGIS report. University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  40. Sulaiman RV, Hall A (2002) Beyond technology dissemination—can Indian agricultural extension re-invent itself? Policy brief 16. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  41. Swanson B, Rajalahti R (2010) Strengthening agriculture extension and advisory systems: procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems. Agricultural and rural development discussion paper 45. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Swanson B, Farner B, Bahal R (1990) The current status of agricultural extension worldwide. In: Report of the global consultation on agriculture extension. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  43. Van den Berg H (2004) IPM farmer field schools: a synthesis of 25 impact evaluations. Prepared for the Global IPM Facility, Wageningen University, the Netherlands. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/ad487E/ad487E00.pdf
  44. Van den Berg H, Jiggins J (2007) Investing in farmers—the impacts of farmer field schools in relation to integrated pest management. World Dev 35(4):663–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wambui M (2002) Meet the champions: DG interview with Dr. Nancy Hafkin on ICT and Gender in Africa. Development Gateway, ICT for Development. Retrieved November 10, 2004 from: http://www.developmentgateway.org/
  46. World Bank (2000) Implementation completion report for Indonesia: Integrated Pest Management training project. Report No. 20212, June 6. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/06/728922/indonesia-integrated-pest-management-training-project
  47. World Bank/IFAD/FAO (International Fund for Agricultural Development/Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations) (2009) Gender in agriculture sourcebook. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGENAGRLIVSOUBOOK/Resources/CompleteBook.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2009
  48. World Bank/IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) (2010) Gender and governance in rural services: insights from India, Ghana, and Ethiopia. Gender and governance author team. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Zainudeen A, Iqbal T, Samarajiva R, Ratnadiwakara D (2008) Who’s got the phone? The gendered use of telephones at the bottom of the Pyramid. In: Paper presented at the conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, 22–26 MayGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Development Strategy and Governance DivisionInternational Food Policy Research InstituteWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations