Abstract
Technology is profoundly human, shaping and shaped by our social practices. It causes change, engages diverse stakeholders, raises ethical concerns, and embodies values through its design and use. In one form or another, technology is ubiquitous in the lives of elders. Technologies to support connectedness, safety and well-being are fascinating topics of study not only for what they can do and promise to do for older adults, but for what they and their associated practices could tell us about social perceptions and expectations of old age. The aim of this chapter is to feature the diversity of lenses applied to the study of how technology practices intersect with age, as well as implications for future research and policy making processes. Intersections of age and ability, gender, socioeconomic status, and the understudied intersections of technology, age and culture are areas that can be viewed through a single disciplinary lens, but truly illuminated through a multidisciplinary approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AARP. (April 2005). Beyond 50.05 survey. Retrieved from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/beyond_50_05_survey.pdf
Baker, J., & Bass, G. (2003). Assistive technology and older adults: The journey through caregiving. Manual for The North Dakota Family Caregiver Project, North Dakota State University.
Bowes, A., Dawson, A., & Bell, D. (2012). Ethical implications of lifestyle monitoring data in ageing research. Information, Communication and Society, 15(1), 5–22.
Broderick, A., & Steinmetz, V. (2013, January 30). Centura health at home: Home telehealth as the standard of care. Case Study. The Commonwealth Fund. Retrieved from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Case-Studies/2013/Jan/Telehealth-Synthesis.aspx
Brodsky, J., Habib, J., Hirschfeld, M., & Siegel, B. (2002). Care of the frail elderly in developed and developing countries: The experience and the challenges. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 14(14), 279–286.
Brown, N., & Webster, A. (2004). New medical technologies and society: Reordering life. Cambridge: Polity.
Brownsell, S., Bradley, D., Blackburn, S., Cardinaux, F., & Hawley, M. S. (2011). A systematic review of lifestyle monitoring technologies. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17, 185–189.
Burchardt, T. (2004). Capabilities and disability: The capabilities framework and the social model of disability. Disability and Society, 19(7), 735–751.
Charness, N., Kelley, C., Bosman, E., & Mottram, M. (2001). Word-processing training and retraining: Effects of adult age, experience, and interface. Psychology and Aging, 16, 110–127.
Cohen, L. (1998). No aging in India: Alzheimer’s, the bad family, and other modern things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Courtney, K.L, Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Skubic, M. (2008). Needing smart home technologies: The perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Informatics in Primary Care, 16, 195–201. Retrieved from http://www.radcliffe-oxford.com/
CTA. (2013a). Winter issue brief. Strategies for incorporation of telehealth-based care coordination and management solutions into programs to integrate care for dual eligibles. Retrieved from http://www.agetechwest.com/files/CTA%20Dual_Eligibles_Brief_2012.2.3.pdf
CTA. (2013b). The new era of connected aging: A framework for understanding technologies that support older adults in aging in place. Center for technology and aging issue brief. Retrieved from http://www.techandaging.org/ConnectedAgingFramework.pdf?utm_source=Master+List&utm_campaign=976104dcb4May_CABrief5_6_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e60c8920ea-976104dcb4-16699438
Czaja, S. J., & Lee, C. C. (2007). The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 341–349.
Darkins, A., Ryan, P., Kobb, R., Foster, L., Edmonson, E., Wakefield, B., et al. (2008). Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 14(10), 1118–1126.
Demiris, G. (2009). Independence and shared decision making: The role of smart home technology in empowering older adults. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 6432–6436).
Demiris, G. (2010). Information technology and systems in home health care. In S. Olson (Ed.), The role of human factors in home health care: Workshop summary (pp. 173–200). Washington: The National Academies Press.
Demiris, G., & Hensel, B. K. (2008). Technologies for an aging society: A systematic review of “smart home” applications. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 47, 30–39.
Demiris, G., Skubic, M., Rantz, M., Keller, J., Aud, M., Hensel, B., & He, Z. (2006). Smart home sensors for the elderly: A model for participatory formative evaluation. Proceedings of IEEE EMBS International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Ioannina, Greece, October 26–28 (pp 1–4).
Department of Health. (2011). Whole system demonstrator programme headline findings. Retrieved from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_131684
Dring, D. (2013). Personal communication
EFORTT. (2011). Deliverable 7: Final research report of ethical frameworks for telecare technologies for older people at home. Submitted to the European Commission, available from Maggie Mort, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2013). Connecting America: The national broadband plan. Retrieved from http://www.broadband.gov/download-plan/
Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., & Gables, C. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Gardner, P., Netherland, J., & Kamber, T. (2012). Getting turned on: Using ICT training to promote active ageing in New York City. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1), 1–16.
Gibson, H. (2000). Loneliness in later life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Goins, R. T., Williams, D. A., Carter, M. W., Spencer, S. M., & Solovieva, T. (2005). Perceived barriers to health care access among rural older adults: A qualitative study. Journal of Rural Health, 21, 206–213.
Grenier, A. M. (2003). Unhinging the assumptions within independence: Toward a broader conceptualization of diversity and difference in home care. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 51, 29–48.
Herman Bouma Fund for Gerontechnology. (2013). What is gerontechnology? Retrieved from http://gerontechnologie.nl/what-is-gerontechnology/
International Society for Gerontechnology. (2013). Home website: http://gerontechnology.info/index.php/journal/pages/view/isghome
Jaeger, B. (2004). Trapped in the digital divide? Old people in the information society. Science Studies, 17(2), 5–22.
Jaeger, B. (2012). New frontiers in the digital divide: Revisiting policy for digital inclusion. Paper presented at The European Group for Public Administration (EGPA) Annual Conference, Bergan, Norway, September 5–8. Retrieved from https://www.scss.tcd.ie/disciplines/information_systems/egpa/bergen.htm
Kane, R. L. (2009). Empowerment of seniors and paradigm change: A commentary on Haber’s empowerment paradigm. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28, 298–303.
Katz, S., & Marshall, B. (2004). Is the functional ‘normal’? Aging, sexuality and the bio-marking of successful living. History of the Human Sciences, 17(1), 53–75.
Kodner, D. L. (2003). Consumer-directed services: Lessons and implications for integrated systems of care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 3(12), e12.
Krogh, K. (2004). Redefining home care for women with disabilities: A call for citizenship. In K. Grant, C. Amaratunga, P. Armstrong, M. Boscoe, A. Pederson, & K. Willson (Eds.), Caring for/caring about. Aurora: Garamond Press.
Ladner, R. E. (2010). Accessible technology and models of disability. In M. M. K. Oishi, I. M. Mitchel, & M. V. H. F. Loos (Eds.), Design and use of assistive technology: Social, technical, ethical, and economic challenges. New York: Springer Publishing.
Lehoux, P. (2006). The problem of healthcare technology: Policy implications for modern health care systems. New York: Routledge.
Lehoux, P. (2008). The duality of health technology in chronic illness: How designers envision our future. Chronic Illness, 4, 85–97.
Loe, M. (2010). Doing it my way: Old women, technology and wellbeing. In K. Joyce & M. Loe (Eds.), Technogenarians: Studying health and illness through an ageing, science, and technology lens. Hoboken: Wiley.
Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L. J., Shankar, K., & Connelly, K. H. (2011). Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework. Ageing International, 36, 232–252.
Lorenzen-Huber, L., Shankar, K., Caine, K., Connelly, K., Camp, J., Walker, B., et al. (2012). How in-home technologies mediate caregiving relationships in later life. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 441–455.
Madden, M. (2010). Older adults and social media. Pew Internet. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Older-Adults-and-Social-Media.aspx
Martin, S. (2010). Research into the future housing and support needs of older people. Electronic assistive technology—supporting older people within local communities. Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.nihe.gov.uk/electronic_assistive_technology__supporting_older_people_within_local_communities__published_october_2010_.pdf
Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing an ethics of care which promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1–16.
Mort, M., Roberts, C., & Milligan, C. (2011). Telecare and older people: Re-ordering social relations. In R. von Schomberg (Ed.), Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and society technologies fields (pp. 150–164). The European Commission’s Science in Society Initiative EFORTT Project. Retrieved from http://www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/6613/_draft/mep-rapport-2011_en.pdf
Neven, L. (2011). Representations of the old and ageing in the design of the new and emerging: Assessing the design of Ambient Intelligence technologies for older people. Published dissertation, University of Twente.
Older Adults Technology Services (2013). http://www.oats.org
Olson, K. E., O’Brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., & Charness, N. (2011). Diffusion of technology: Frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing International, 36, 123–145.
Oudshoorn, N. (2011). Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pecchioni, L. L., Ota, H., & Sparks, L. (2004). Cultural issues in communication and aging. In J. F. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and aging (2nd ed., pp. 115–138). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Perissinotto, C., Cenzer, S. I., & Covinsky, K. (2012). Loneliness of older persons: A predictor of functional decline and death. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(14), 1078–1084.
Rubinstein, R., Kilbride, J., & Nagy, S. (1992). Elders living alone: Frailty and the perception of choice. New York: Aldine De Gruyer.
Ruggiano, N. (2012). Consumer direction in long-term care policy: Overcoming barriers to promoting older adults’ opportunities for self-direction. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(2), 146–159.
Scala, M. A., & Nerney, T. (2000). People first: The consumers in consumer direction. Quarterly Journal of the American Society on Aging, 24(3), 55–59.
Secker, J., Hill, R., Villeneau, L., & Parkman, S. (2003). Promoting independence: But promoting what and how? Ageing and Society, 23, 375–391.
Shankar, K. (2010). Pervasive computing and an aging populace: Methodological challenges for understanding privacy implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 8(3), 236–248.
Skubic, M., Alexander, G., Popescu, M., Rantz, M., & Keller, J. (2009). A smart home application to eldercare: Current status and lessons learned. Technology and Health Care, 17, 183–201.
Theeke, L. A. (2010). Sociodemographic and health-related risks for loneliness and outcome differences by loneliness status in a sample of older US adults. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 3(2), 113–125.
Torres-Gil, F., & Hofland, B. (2012). Vulnerable populations. In H. Cisneros, M. Dyer-Chamberlain, & J. Hickie (Eds.), Independent for life: Homes and neighborhoods for an aging America (pp. 221–232). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Vasunilashorn, S., Steinman, B.A., Liebig, P.S., & Pynoos, J. (2012). Aging in place: Evolution of a research topic whose time has come. Journal of Aging Research.
Wahl, H. W., Iwarsson, S., & Oswald, F. (2012). Aging well and the environment: Toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 306–316.
Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the information society (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Zickuhr, K., & Madden, M. (2012, June 6). Older adults and internet use. Pew internet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Older-adults-and-internet-use/Summary-of-findings.aspx
Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012, April 13). Digital differences. Pew internet. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences/Overview.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berridge, C. (2014). Seeing the Social in Technology for Older Adults: Making the Implicit Explicit Through a Multidisciplinary Lens. In: Vakalahi, H., Simpson, G., Giunta, N. (eds) The Collective Spirit of Aging Across Cultures. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8594-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8594-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8593-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8594-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)