Skip to main content

4th Generational Theories of Intersection: Multicultural Aging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Collective Spirit of Aging Across Cultures

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Aging ((Int. Perspect. Aging,volume 9))

  • 1339 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, authors asserted that the multifarious reality of older adults’ social positions offer unique opportunities and challenges to our traditional gerontological theories. Authors presented intersectionality as an analytical framework to move readers beyond their disciplinary boundaries towards a 4th generation of theories for co-creation of innovative theories, methods, and interventions. In the co-edited book, The Collective Spirit of Aging Across Cultures, we critically reflect on how chapter authors integrated gerontological theories guided by the philosophical assumptions of intersectionality for addressing multicultural issues of aging, including caregiving, intimacy, elder mistreatment, financial crisis, housing transitions, and technology that span and interact with all social identities at multiple levels. We have invited readers to embrace a lens of intersectionality, and provided a discourse towards a 4th generation of theories to inform trans-disciplinary professionals on how to co-create with collectivist communities aimed at addressing social justice, health and well-being of multicultural older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As cited in Medina and Negroi referenced chapter, the @ sign is the deference to the quite recent determination to develop and use nonsexist language and to identify with Latin America (Wallerstein 2005).

References

  • Bengtson, V. L., Burgess, E. O., & Parrott, T. M. (1997). Theory, explanation, and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. The Journals of Gerontology, 52B(2), S72–S88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, D., Putney, N. M., Bengtson, V. L., & Silverstein, M. (2009). The future of theories of aging. In V. L. Bengtson, D. Gans, N. M. Putney, & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (2nd ed., pp. 3–23). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, V. W. (1995). Social models of aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 14, 12–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the U.S. population: Emerging American identities. Population and Development Review, 35(1), 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00260.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdie-Vaugns, V., & Eibach, R. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, G. K., & Velkoff, V. A. (2010). The next four decades, The older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Current Population Reports, P25-1138. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2005). Latin@s: What’s in a name? In R. Grosfoguel et al., Latin@s in the World-System: Decolonization struggles in the twenty-first century U.S. empire. (pp. 31–39). Boulder: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaynell M. Simpson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, G.M., Giunta, N., Vakalahi, H.F.O. (2014). 4th Generational Theories of Intersection: Multicultural Aging. In: Vakalahi, H., Simpson, G., Giunta, N. (eds) The Collective Spirit of Aging Across Cultures. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8594-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics