Mid-infrared Laser Based Gas Sensor Technologies for Environmental Monitoring, Medical Diagnostics, Industrial and Security Applications

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics book series (NAPSB)


Recent advances in the development of compact sensors based on mid-infrared continuous wave (CW), thermoelectrically cooled (TEC) and room temperature operated quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) for the detection, quantification and monitoring of trace gas species and their applications in environmental and industrial process analysis will be reported. These sensors employ a 2f wavelength modulation (WM) technique based on quartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) that achieves detection sensitivity at the ppbv and sub ppbv concentration levels. The merits of QEPAS include an ultra-compact, rugged sensing module, with wide dynamic range and immunity to environmental acoustic noise. QCLs are convenient QEPAS excitation sources that permit the targeting of strong fundamental rotational-vibrational transitions which are one to two orders of magnitude more intense in the mid-infrared than overtone transitions in the near infrared spectral region.


Laser spectroscopy Quartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy Wavelength modulation spectroscopy Quantum cascade lasers Trace gas detection Carbon monoxide Nitric oxide 



The Rice University group acknowledges financial support from a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant EEC-0540832 entitled “Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment (MIRTHE)”, a NSF-ANR award for international collaboration in chemistry “Next generation of Compact Infrared Laser based Sensor for environmental monitoring (NexCILAS)” and grant C-0586 from the Robert Welch Foundation.


  1. 1.
    Faist J (2013) Quantum cascade lasers. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN 13: 978-0198528241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capasso F (2010) High-performance midinfrared quantum cascade lasers. SPIE Opt Eng 49:111102ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Razeghi M, Bai Y, Slivkin S, Davish SR (2010) High-performance InP-based midinfrared quantum cascade lasers at Northwestern University. SPIE Opt Eng 49:111103-4ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lyakh A, Maulini R, Tsekoun AG, Patel CK (2010) Progress in high-performance quantum cascade lasers. SPIE Opt Eng 49:111105ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Razeghi M (2009) High-performance InP-based Mid-IR quantum cascade lasers. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Elect 15:941–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le QY, Bai Y, Bandyopadhyay N, Slivken S, Razeghi M (2010) Room-temperature continuous wave operation of distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers with watt-level power output. Appl Phys Lett 97:231119-1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong L, Spagnolo V, Lewicki R, Tittel FK (2011) Ppb-level detection of nitric oxide using an external cavity quantum cascade laser based QEPAS sensor. Opt Express 19:24037–24045ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spagnolo V, Kosterev AA, Dong L, Lewicki R, Tittel FK (2010) NO trace gas sensor based on quartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy and external cavity quantum cascade laser. Appl Phys B 100:125–130ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kosterev AA, Bakhirkin YA, Curl RF, Tittel FK (2002) Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Opt Lett 27:1902–1904ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosterev AA, Tittel FK, Serebryakov D, Malinovsky A, Morozov A (2005) Applications of quartz tuning fork in spectroscopic gas sensing. Rev Sci Instrum 76:043105ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curl RF, Capasso F, Gmachl C, Kosterev AA, McManus B, Lewicki R, Pusharsky M, Wysocki G, Tittel FK (2010) Quantum cascade lasers in chemical physics. Chem Phys Lett Frontiers Article 487:1–18ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong L, Kosterev AA, Thomazy D, Tittel FK (2010) QEPAS spectrophones: design, optimization, and performance. Appl Phys B 100:627–635ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma Y, Lewicki R, Razeghi M, Tittel FK (2013) QEPAS based ppb-level detection of CO and N2O using a high power CW DFB-QCL. Opt Express 21:1008–1019ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma Y, Lewicki R, Razeghi M, Tittel FK (2013) QEPAS based ppb-level detection of CO and N2O using a high power CW DFB-QCL. Opt Express 21:1008–1019ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li J, Parchatka U, Königstedt R, Fischer H (2012) Real-time measurements of atmospheric CO using a continuous-wave room temperature quantum cascade laser based spectrometer. Opt Express 20:7590–7601ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tao L, Sun K, Amir Khan M, Miller DJ, Zondlo MA (2012) Compact and portable open-path sensor for simultaneous measurements of atmospheric N2O and CO using a quantum cascade laser. Opt Express 20:28106–28118ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kasyutich VL, Holdsworth RJ, Martin PA (2008) Mid-infrared laser absorption spectrometers based upon all-diode laser difference frequency generation and a room temperature quantum cascade laser for the detection of CO, N2O and NO. Appl Phys B 92:271–279ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Laser and Fiber Electronics GroupWroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations